how to remove 'undefined dependency' lines

[8729] info: rules: meta test SARE_HTML_URI_OBFU4 has undefined dependency '__SARE_HEAD_FALSE' [8729] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency 'PYZOR_CHECK' [8729] info: rules: meta test SARE_HTML_MANY_BR10 has undefined dependency '__SARE_HEAD_FALSE' [8729] info: rules: m

Re: Stop the CCing please. (was "Who is APEWS.ORG" & "Sender Address Verification is NOT abouse and very effective") [signed]

Matthias Schmidt [c] wrote: > Jonas Eckerman: > >Chris St. Pierre wrote: > >> From: Jonas Eckerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> Fix your Reply-To header and you won't get any more list messages in > >> your private email. No. The Reply-To: field is reserved for re

Re: Whitelist scoring question

I was using my own script for SARE updates last week. The I switched to sa-update subscribing to openprotect.org. Then my GEOCITES rules seemed to start missing; so I did some diging and found somebody else unhappy with the GEOCITIES rules in 70_sare_specific.cf and was kind enough to share. I

Re: Proper way to start spamd at boot

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > Wanting to know the proper way to start spamd at boot time. Currently I > copied the spamd perl script from /usr/sbin into the /etc/init.d/ > directory and then used chkconfig to add it to start at run levels 3 and > 5. So basically the machine is just starti

Proper way to start spamd at boot

Hello, Wanting to know the proper way to start spamd at boot time. Currently I copied the spamd perl script from /usr/sbin into the /etc/init.d/ directory and then used chkconfig to add it to start at run levels 3 and 5. So basically the machine is just starting spamd with no options (i.e. "./sp

Re: Whitelist scoring question

Hi Anthony, I was using Openprotect's SARE update channel for my standard sare rules. I am not sure exactly what the issue was, but believe it was due to a redefined "USER_IN_WHITELIST" that they have somewhere in their rule set. To correct the issue, I removed all cf files that were updated from

Re: bayes autolearn only on non image mails

On Mar 31, 2007, at 11:06 AM, ram wrote: Can I configure SA to autolearn only on non image mails. Prbably use in conjunction with the LARGO rulesets If a mail contains an image , this could probably be an image spam and I dont want to learn words from here and poison my database There w

unsubscribe

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Bill McCormick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Samstag, 31. März 2007 05:54 An: users@spamassassin.apache.org Betreff: Re: Missing tests/scores? Matt Kettler wrote: > Bill McCormick wrote: >> OK, so they're parts of normal conversations. And geocites i

bayes autolearn only on non image mails

Can I configure SA to autolearn only on non image mails. Prbably use in conjunction with the LARGO rulesets If a mail contains an image , this could probably be an image spam and I dont want to learn words from here and poison my database There was a thread last week about but I could get no an

Re: spam_level_char

Wael Shahin wrote: > Dear List, > I am using spamassassin-3.0.1-0.EL4 on an RHELv4 machine > spamassassin is plugged to CommuniGate through CGPSA > I have tried chaning the character for the X-SpamLevel: to be (X) byt > inserting the following in the local.cf > spam_level_char X > seems like spamas

spam_level_char

Dear List, I am using spamassassin-3.0.1-0.EL4 on an RHELv4 machine spamassassin is plugged to CommuniGate through CGPSA I have tried chaning the character for the X-SpamLevel: to be (X) byt inserting the following in the local.cf spam_level_char X seems like spamassassin is not responding to th