i have configure spamassassin with mysql. now it fetch whitelist and
blacklist data from userpref table. but mail detect as spam in both cases
either user in whitelist or in blacklist. and spam report shows that user
in blacklist and user in whitelist
case 1 when user in whitelist
X-Spam-Status:
Same thing happened to me recently and it eventually showed up. Although
my setup's a little different, I think qmail keeps trying until it
finally delivers.
Does qmail-cntl -stat show anything?
Further OT ...
Depending on how you set up your toaster (I used qmailrocks,) the group
permissions
I had some permissions trouble after updating a few things last night
and as a result mail was coming in but not getting to the place where
it could be "popped" by the user (me). The mail was coming in and being
handled by spamd because I could see action in the log file, but
nothing was showing up
After about a year of running sa-learn from a user that isn't the user
that spamd is running under, I've changed things to allow login to the
spamd user account (qscand). So, will running this command now work for
helping train my bayes files?
sa-learn --showdots --mbox --spam /home/domainmail/mai
I have been using SA since ~2.60 and because I work for an ISP, I need
to be more tolerant than most with regards to handling email. With this
in mind I have made a few modifications to the STOCK version and have to
manually patch with every upgrade, so here are some of the modifications
I have ma
On Saturday 24 March 2007 2:23 pm, vruk wrote:
> Was there ever an answer to this?
> I have every one of my emails from earthlink saying they are suspicious,
> using the earthlnk scamblocker analize.
> What is noehlo.host?
>
I finally got the attention of a few people at corp and here is a reply fr
On Friday 23 March 2007 4:16 pm, Gary V wrote:
> >>>I've been on this mail list only for a few months now, and am wondering
> >>>if I am the smallest guy here.
> >>
> >>No, you're not.
> >
> >Oh me me me!
> >
> >1 domain, 1 user. :)
>
> I think only someone that uses fetchmail could beat that (no d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hmm
I got this from Whois.sc
Domain ID:D135922574-LROR
Domain Name:APEWS.ORG
Created On:27-Dec-2006 19:25:43 UTC
Last Updated On:26-Feb-2007 03:47:58 UTC
Expiration Date:27-Dec-2007 19:25:43 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:PSI-USA, Inc. dba Domain Robot (R6
Trying to figure out who these people are Who is APEWS.ORG? They claim
to be a blocklist provider to block spam but they are blocking spam
filtering services. They also seem to be hiding who is behind it. Who
are they? Is this some fake front for uceprotect?
Here's what they have on the /24 bl
hi -- could you open these as *multiple* *separate* bugs on
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ ? Some of them will be more
likely to get accepted than others. ;)
--j.
Jorge Valdes writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using SA since ~2.60 and because I work for an ISP, I need
> to be more toleran
On 2007-03-27, Nathan Brink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does SPAM Assassin score what we boarheaded Americans consider to be
> "foreign language" email messages the same as it would English?
Are you looking for something that would score mail differently
depending on the language used? Some of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok thank you.
Dan Barker wrote:
> No, it needs to be:
>
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] yahoo.com
>
> This covers ALL yahoo groups. You'll need more granularity to
> specify the groupname, as that information is in other headers.
>
> Dan
>
>
No, it needs to be:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] yahoo.com
This covers ALL yahoo groups. You'll need more granularity to specify the
groupname, as that information is in other headers.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Ilya Vishnyakov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thank you.
James E. Pratt wrote:
> No as I understand it, whitelist_from_rcvd checks relaying domain,
> whitelist_from is a "blanket-whitelist" that only checks from
> header - Only mail that matches: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from
> actual yahoo.com re
No as I understand it, whitelist_from_rcvd checks relaying domain,
whitelist_from is a "blanket-whitelist" that only checks from header -
Only mail that matches: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from actual
yahoo.com relays will get whitelisted. (Sorry I forgot my "-" before!)
It appears this may not work a
Thanks, I did run exactly that, and got the output that I posted. Do you
have any idea why I might be getting such a limited output?
What do you have set for reporting purposes in your local.cf file?
Regards,
Mark
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:31:16PM -0500, maillist wrote:
> Mark Adams wrote:
> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does this mean
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] yahoo.com
That all mail coming from yahoo will be in the whitelist?
I certanly don't want this to happen.
James E. Pratt wrote:
> But, wouldn't that allow a spammer spoofing using th
But, wouldn't that allow a spammer spoofing using that address
"full-spammer-access"?
I use:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] yahoo.com
regards,
jamie
-Original Message-
From: maillist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:34 PM
To: Ilya Vishnyako
Ilya Vishnyakov wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hmm. Hello Spamassassin Gurus!
I'm having difficulties with yahoogroups.com emails. I whitelisted
them as [EMAIL PROTECTED] , but emails still get into the
spam. Is there any other way that I can whitelist it?
I attach 2 scre
Hi,
I have been using SA since ~2.60 and because I work for an ISP, I need
to be more tolerant than most with regards to handling email. With this
in mind I have made a few modifications to the STOCK version and have to
manually patch with every upgrade, so here are some of the modifications
Mark Martinec writes:
> > > > 2.4 RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS RBL: CompleteWhois:
> > > > sender on bogons IP block [102.176.29.76 listed in
> > > > combined-HIB.dnsiplists.completewhois.com]
> > > I wonder why score for RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS is 0 in 3.2.0-rc1 ?
> > > (unlike RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID a
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:00:37AM -0400, Kevin Plested wrote:
I am running SA 3.1.7 on a UNIX box, I haven't received an update since I
installed it. Am I doing something wrong ? I have included below the result
of "sa-update -D", which shows that 507739 is the latest ver
>
> You could run: "spamassassin --test-mode < message", and see what it is
> scoring.
>
Hi There,
I have tried this, and get the below result.
--_=_NextPart_001_01C7710E.58A560A4--
hits=4.0 required=5.0 test=NO_RDNS,VOWEL_FROM_7
This does not show whitelist hits, should it?
Regards,
Ma
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> I've been all through the website, and it would appear that running
>> "sa-update" with no parameters should be all I need to do. I run a separate
>> update for SARE updates, and that completes fine.
>
> Yes, to download/install an update, you can just run sa-update. Yo
> > > 2.4 RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS RBL: CompleteWhois:
> > > sender on bogons IP block [102.176.29.76 listed in
> > > combined-HIB.dnsiplists.completewhois.com]
> > I wonder why score for RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS is 0 in 3.2.0-rc1 ?
> > (unlike RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID and RCVD_IN_WHOIS_HIJACKED...
>
>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:00:37AM -0400, Kevin Plested wrote:
> I am running SA 3.1.7 on a UNIX box, I haven't received an update since I
> installed it. Am I doing something wrong ? I have included below the result
> of "sa-update -D", which shows that 507739 is the latest version, but I'm
> pret
Mark Martinec writes:
> > 2.4 RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS RBL: CompleteWhois: sender on bogons IP block
> > [102.176.29.76 listed in combined-HIB.dnsiplists.completewhois.com]
>
> I wonder why score for RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS is 0 in 3.2.0-rc1 ?
> (unlike RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID and RCVD_IN_WHOI
I am running SA 3.1.7 on a UNIX box, I haven't received an update since I
installed it. Am I doing something wrong ? I have included below the result
of "sa-update -D", which shows that 507739 is the latest version, but I'm
pretty sure it isn't.
I've been all through the website, and it would appe
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 04:40:27PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Mark Adams wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:06:51AM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > > Is it scoring the whitelist lower or is it just not hitting?
> > >
> > > Can you post your whitelist rule and the headers from an example
> > >
> > Whitelist file is in /etc/spamassassin/ and is called whitelist.cf
> > entry;
> >
> > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Is /etc/spamassassin where the rest of your site config is located? Typically
> it's /etc/mail/spamassassin, but "spamassassin -D --lint" would tell you.
>
Hi,
Yes /et
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 06:52:27PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Pablo Allietti wrote:
> > Hi all i need to list all members that i have in blacklist and in
> > whitelist with the scores from anyone.. is that possible?
>
> Do you mean the AWL? That can be done using the check_whitelist script
> in
I am now able to call spamassassin from exim with the users localpart of
their email address from within exim.
I have tested it and it is calling to spamd with the line user='whatever'
however in both AWL and bayes i dont see the user appearing, now im
aware that the bayes required a certain m
> 2.4 RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS RBL: CompleteWhois: sender on bogons IP block
> [102.176.29.76 listed in combined-HIB.dnsiplists.completewhois.com]
I wonder why score for RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS is 0 in 3.2.0-rc1 ?
(unlike RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID and RCVD_IN_WHOIS_HIJACKED, which are nonzero)
r
Loren Wilton wrote:
Things are basically working, but you don't seem to have network test
enabled, and you haven't trained enough ham/spam messages yet for Bayes
to kick in.
If you are starting SA using spamd, check for a -L parameter on the
command line and remove it. That should enable n
> Before anyone can you give you a hint on how to block the
> messages, we would need to see what the messages are.
>
> Same form as before, save the message (with full headers) and
> place it somewhere where we can download it.
http://www.rocsca.it/INBOX
rocsca
Hi,
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Before anyone can you give you a hint on how to block the
messages, we would need to see what the messages are.
Same form as before, save the message (with full headers) and
place it somewhere where we can download it.
http://www.rocsca.it/INBOX
There is anothe
If you wish to reject at MTA level then please read
http://www.postfix.org/uce.html under the section "Client hostname/address
restrictions" as you are able to specify a list of RBLs.
Regards,
UxBoD
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:20:16 +0200, "Rocco Scappatura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> What MTA
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Panagiotis Christias wrote:
the last days we get a lot of spam like this:
KAUF-TIPP DER WOCHE
I wrote a few of my own rules especially to catch those stocks scams
together with bayes. If you don't have any people who should write you in
German you can also use the X-Lan
> What MTA are you using ?
Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new
rocsca
Hi Rocco,
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Since some day, It's increased the number of spams which SA doesn't
block.
Every time I'm going to analyse the message:
1) Save the message in mbox format 'message.mbox'
2) su - amavis -c "spamassassin -t < message.mbox"
And I get that the score is greater th
What MTA are you using ?
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:06:55 +0200, "Rocco Scappatura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Since some day, It's increased the number of spams which SA doesn't
> block.
>
> Every time I'm going to analyse the message:
>
> 1) Save the message in mbox format 'message.mbox'
> 2) s
Since some day, It's increased the number of spams which SA doesn't
block.
Every time I'm going to analyse the message:
1) Save the message in mbox format 'message.mbox'
2) su - amavis -c "spamassassin -t < message.mbox"
And I get that the score is greater the 5.0 and often I get:
1.6 RCVD_IN_
Things are basically working, but you don't seem to have network test
enabled, and you haven't trained enough ham/spam messages yet for Bayes to
kick in.
If you are starting SA using spamd, check for a -L parameter on the command
line and remove it. That should enable network tests for you, a
My goodness. That are sending that new format in German too!
Could you send me a few of these AS ATTACHMENTS, WITH FULL HEADERS? I'm
going to try to get time to write up some rules for the English-language
version in the next few days, and if I have some German examples I may be
able to writ
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:40:53 +0300, "Panagiotis Christias"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>the last days we get a lot of spam like this:
>
> spam body begins here
>Words disputed interview galli provisions raise, eyebrows dead holders!
>
>KAUF-TIPP DER WOCHE
>
>LESEN SIE DIE NACHRIC
I ran them through our server and scored as follows :-
Content analysis details: (9.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
-- --
0.3 SARE_WEOFFER BODY: Offers Something
3.2 FUZZY_PHARM
Hello,
the last days we get a lot of spam like this:
spam body begins here
Words disputed interview galli provisions raise, eyebrows dead holders!
KAUF-TIPP DER WOCHE
LESEN SIE DIE NACHRICTEN
STONEBRIDGE RES EXP Frankfurt: S3C.F
Name :STONEBRIDGE RES EXP
Kurzel :S3C.F
WK
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 March 2007 01:16
> To: Caleb Cushing
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: blacklist by default
>
> Caleb Cushing wrote:
> > Is it possible to configure spamassassin 3.x to consider
> all mail spa
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
First thing first. Could you run a spamassassin -D --lint as the user which is
scanning the email, and post the results please. This will allow people to
diagnose the problem more easily.
Regards,
UxBoD
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:12:20 +0100, Jimmy Stewpot <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:12:20 +0100, Jimmy Stewpot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I have recently installed spamassassin on my new ubuntu distribution
>from the apt package. I seem to be having issues where emails that are
>obviously spam are not being marked.
>
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=0
First thing first. Could you run a spamassassin -D --lint as the user which is
scanning the email, and post the results please. This will allow people to
diagnose the problem more easily.
Regards,
UxBoD
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:12:20 +0100, Jimmy Stewpot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
Hello,
I have recently installed spamassassin on my new ubuntu distribution
from the apt package. I seem to be having issues where emails that are
obviously spam are not being marked.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=3.1.7-deb
Is in the headers of the
52 matches
Mail list logo
