RE: patches for FREEBSD sa-update

2007-03-21 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Martinec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:10 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: patches for FREEBSD sa-update > > Ps, as an aside, thanks for an incredibly flexible engine (amavisd). I found a quandary wi

UNPARSABLE RELAY?

2007-03-21 Thread J.
I'm trying to figure out why I'm getting false positives on certain emails. After running sa from the command line I get this as part of the output. Binaryops is our domain and speakeasy is our isp.: [13513] dbg: rules: ran eval rule SUBJ_ALL_CAPS ==> got hit [13513] dbg: eval: forged-HELO: fr

Re: patches for FREEBSD sa-update

2007-03-21 Thread Mark Martinec
> > I'd feel more comfortable if some FreeBSD master guru would > > take a look and have a final say. > > Any master guru's out there? I consulted one, a FreeBSD maintainer from the office next door :) After reading our thread, his answer was a clear and decisive: /var/db/spamassasin (but for co

RE: Reporting spam by forwarded/attached message

2007-03-21 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Wael Shaheen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 10:09 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Reporting spam by forwarded/attached message > > Hello everyone, > am looking for a mechanism which allows my clients to report

Re: whitelist_from_rcvd

2007-03-21 Thread Bob McClure Jr
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 05:03:49PM -0400, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > I have this in my local.cf file... > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] *.blackberry.com > > Shouldn't this not get tagged? Change that to whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] blackberry.com You don't need or want th

whitelist_from_rcvd

2007-03-21 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
I have this in my local.cf file... whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] *.blackberry.com Shouldn't this not get tagged? Return-Path: <> Delivered-To: spam-quarantine X-Envelope-From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Envelope-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Quarantine-ID: X-Spam-Flag: YES X

Re: [OT] How to deal with SPF_FAIL ?

2007-03-21 Thread Nigel Frankcom
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:12:27 -0700, Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mar 6, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Raul Dias wrote: >> I was thinking about adding spf checking support directly in the MTA. >> This would allow messages that fail spf to be instantly blocked. > >Bad idea, and not recommended even

RE: Query Reg spam originate to Unknown user

2007-03-21 Thread Jon Armitage
> -Original Message- > From: sushma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 March 2007 23:09 > > The mail tagged as spam in relay server, will be send to > local host to one account(i.e [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > > can i do something with having list of genuine user of local host. > Sushma, T

RE: spamassassin not working - spamass.sock unsafe

2007-03-21 Thread Joey Davis
Thanks for your kind response. That change did resolve the problem. Appreciatively, Joey -Original Message- From: SM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 3:01 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: spamassassin not working - spamass.sock unsafe At 11:1

Re: [OT] How to deal with SPF_FAIL ?

2007-03-21 Thread Jo Rhett
On Mar 6, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Raul Dias wrote: I was thinking about adding spf checking support directly in the MTA. This would allow messages that fail spf to be instantly blocked. Bad idea, and not recommended even by the maintainers of OpenSPF. Also, many webservices (like contact forms, ph

RE: spamassassin not working - spamass.sock unsafe

2007-03-21 Thread SM
At 11:15 21-03-2007, Joey Davis wrote: If the spamass-milter creates the following socket: srwxr-xr-x 1 sa-milt sa-milt0 Mar 21 13:08 spamass-milter.sock [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamass-milter]# pwd /var/run/spamass-milter Should the lines in sendmail config file point to the same exact socket?

RE: spamassassin not working - spamass.sock unsafe

2007-03-21 Thread Joey Davis
pardon my ignorance here. If the spamass-milter creates the following socket: srwxr-xr-x 1 sa-milt sa-milt0 Mar 21 13:08 spamass-milter.sock [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamass-milter]# pwd /var/run/spamass-milter Should the lines in sendmail config file point to the same exact socket? If so the

RE: spamassassin not working - spamass.sock unsafe

2007-03-21 Thread Sietse van Zanen
Do you look for your car exactly where you parked it? -Original Message- From: Joey Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 19:15 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: spamassassin not working - spamass.sock unsafe pardon my ignorance here. If the spa

RE: Query Reg spam originate to Unknown user

2007-03-21 Thread sushma
In continuation to my previous mail, The mail tagged as spam in relay server, will be send to local host to one account(i.e [EMAIL PROTECTED]). can i do something with having list of genuine user of local host. On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Jon Armitage wrote: -Original Message- From: su

Re: Reporting spam by forwarded/attached message

2007-03-21 Thread Chris St. Pierre
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Wael Shaheen wrote: Hello everyone, am looking for a mechanism which allows my clients to report spam by forwarding a message or attaching it to a single mailbox i.e [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can i do this, forwarded emails will have the sender information cut off before bei

spamassassin --debug scoring different from live score

2007-03-21 Thread frank jones
I've got a gentoo linux machine running qmail with Spamassassin 3.1.8 with spamd/spamc/clamav/qmail-scanner and maildrop. Our setup is for one domain and we're getting about 500-1000 real emails per day and about 7000-1 spams per day. The setup is pretty good, but I've got this feeling tha

Reporting spam by forwarded/attached message

2007-03-21 Thread Wael Shaheen
Hello everyone, am looking for a mechanism which allows my clients to report spam by forwarding a message or attaching it to a single mailbox i.e [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can i do this, forwarded emails will have the sender information cut off before being fed to sa-learn I would appreciate any

RE: patches for FREEBSD sa-update

2007-03-21 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Martinec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 10:54 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: patches for FREEBSD sa-update > > I'd feel more comfortable if some FreeBSD master guru would > take a look and have a fina

Re: patches for FREEBSD sa-update

2007-03-21 Thread Mark Martinec
Michael, > > Perhaps the closest thing is /usr/local/libdata/, intended > > for 'miscellaneous utility data files'. > > Ok, found it, looks good, maybe that's best. > Thanks, this is exactly why I posted this. I'd feel more comfortable if some FreeBSD master guru would take a look and have a fina

RE: patches for FREEBSD sa-update

2007-03-21 Thread Michael Scheidell
Maybe a 'non default' option? In make config? Sa-update path? --- This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(tm) For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com --

RE: patches for FREEBSD sa-update

2007-03-21 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Martinec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 8:20 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: patches for FREEBSD sa-update > > > > Perhaps the closest thing is /usr/local/libdata/, intended > for 'miscellaneous utility

Re: patches for FREEBSD sa-update

2007-03-21 Thread Justin Mason
Mark Martinec writes: > Michael, > > > I am the maintainer for the FreeBsd SA port and about to release patches > > that change the default state directory from /var/lib/spamassassin to > > /usr/local/lib/spamassassin > > This makes it more consistent with FBSD's directory structure (they > > don