ram01 wrote:
Drop the node part of the address i.e. if I wanted 10.1.1.0/24 use 10.1.1/24
That actually makes no difference.
Drop the node part of the address i.e. if I wanted 10.1.1.0/24 use 10.1.1/24
Peter Russell-4 wrote:
>
> Hello, i notice after a lint test the following errors
> [2832] warn: netset: illegal network address given: 'xx.1.0.0/16,'
> [2832] warn: netset: illegal network address given: 'xx.2.0.0/16
Michael,
> I am the maintainer for the FreeBsd SA port and about to release patches
> that change the default state directory from /var/lib/spamassassin to
> /usr/local/lib/spamassassin
> This makes it more consistent with FBSD's directory structure (they
> don't use /var/lib for anything).
I'm n
Howdy,
Just a reminder, the Apache Software Foundation (which SpamAssassin is a
part of) is participating in the in Google Summer of Code again this year.
That means that you can get paid, up to $4500, this summer for working
on SpamAssassin.
The deadline is quickly approaching, you have until
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Peter Russell wrote:
> I have the following set for trusted networks
> trusted_networks xx.1.0.0/16, xx.2.0.0/16, xxx.xxx.xxx.0/24, 127.0.0.0/8
>
> What have i dont wrong?
Lose the commas.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PRO
Peter Russell wrote:
Hello, i notice after a lint test the following errors
[2832] warn: netset: illegal network address given: 'xx.1.0.0/16,'
[2832] warn: netset: illegal network address given: 'xx.2.0.0/16,'
[2832] warn: netset: illegal network address given: 'xxx.xxx.xxx.0/24,'
I have the fol
* Peter Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello, i notice after a lint test the following errors
> [2832] warn: netset: illegal network address given: 'xx.1.0.0/16,'
> [2832] warn: netset: illegal network address given: 'xx.2.0.0/16,'
> [2832] warn: netset: illegal network address given: 'xxx.xxx.xxx.
Sorry, answered it myself - i had coffee, looked at it again and removed
the commas. Copy n paste from main.cf to local.cf might not always be
the best way to approach config changes for SA :)
Sorry to bother you
Peter Russell wrote:
Hello, i notice after a lint test the following errors
[283
xx and xxx are not integers between 0 and 255.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Peter Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 5:19 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Trusted_networks
Hello, i notice after a lint test the following errors
[2832] warn: netse
Hello, i notice after a lint test the following errors
[2832] warn: netset: illegal network address given: 'xx.1.0.0/16,'
[2832] warn: netset: illegal network address given: 'xx.2.0.0/16,'
[2832] warn: netset: illegal network address given: 'xxx.xxx.xxx.0/24,'
I have the following set for trusted
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 2:40 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: patches for FREEBSD sa-update
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:57:50PM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > The reason its impo
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:57:50PM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> The reason its important, is if you do use something like 'sa-update
> --updatedir /usr/local/share/spamassassin or ../etc/mail/spamassassin,
> THREE sets of plugins are loaded:
It's really rules, not necessarily plugins.
fwiw,
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Erik Slooff wrote:
all,
I have an interesting observation on my mail gateway (policyd for
greylisting, postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin); after implementing
greylisting and other measures such as RBLs there aren't enough spam
messages coming through to keep bayes train
I am the maintainer for the FreeBsd SA port and about to release patches
that change the default state directory from /var/lib/spamassassin to
/usr/local/lib/spamassassin
This makes it more consistent with FBSD's directory structure (they
don't use /var/lib for anything).
The reason its important
On Tue, March 20, 2007 13:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Erik Slooff wrote:
>
>> I have an interesting observation on my mail gateway (policyd for
>> greylisting, postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin); after implementing
>> greylisting and other measures such as RBLs there ar
Hi,
I had the same problem where an update from spamass-milter seemd to
cause spamassassin milter stop working and give the same error messages
in /var/log/maillog:
Milter (spamassassin): local socket name
/var/run/spamass-milter/spamass.sock unsafe
Milter (spamassassin): to error state
I
sushma wrote:
hi,
Iam running spamassassin in another machine and relaying mails to
local machine(i.e i am not running spamassassin in local machine). In
this case how to reject mails destined to unknow user.
Mail that comes to your server that is destined for a user that you
don't
Mark Adams wrote:
Hi All,
I have not got to the bottom of this. Does anyone know how to report on
whether a mail is having points deducted because it is whitelisted?
Regards,
Mark
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:34:58PM +, Mark Adams wrote:
Thanks for that,
The lint has not complained abou
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
What version of SA are you running? If not 3.1.8 then upgrade.
# spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.1.8
running on Perl version 5.8.8
rocsca
I was having the same problem with v 3.1.7, and when I upgraded to
3.1.8, they stopped.
Do you get the same
Deivid Vilela wrote:
> Hello everbody
>
> i trying to understand some rules from spamassassin and can't imagine
> what this rule does for filter.
> somebody can explain about UNCLOSED_BRACKET?
describe UNCLOSED_BRACKET Headers contain an unclosed bracket
ie: one of the headers contains a [
Hello everbody
i trying to understand some rules from spamassassin and can't imagine
what this rule does for filter.
somebody can explain about UNCLOSED_BRACKET?
Thanks
Deivid Vilela
___
Yahoo! Mail - Sempre a melhor opção para voc
Joey Davis wrote:
Greetings ...
I can not get spamassassin to work. I have seen this problem in some
newgroups but no definitive solution. Here is the information
OS Version: FC5
Sendmail: 8.13.7
Spamassassin: 3.1.3
Log entries:
Mar 19 17:28:32 obwat sendmail[29903]: l2JMSW21029903: Mil
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Erik Slooff wrote:
I have an interesting observation on my mail gateway (policyd for
greylisting, postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin); after implementing
greylisting and other measures such as RBLs there aren't enough spam
messages coming through to keep bayes trained.
> You really don't give enough information that we can guess
> what could be done to help catch these. All I can guess is
> that you might not be runing network tests, since I don't see
> any network test hits on the two examples.
>
> Try posting a complete spam with the headers attached, and
all,
I have an interesting observation on my mail gateway (policyd for
greylisting, postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin); after implementing
greylisting and other measures such as RBLs there aren't enough spam
messages coming through to keep bayes trained. While bayes has worked fine
over the pa
Content preview: "Yes, I exactly heard it spoken flight of, self
You really don't give enough information that we can guess what could be
done to help catch these. All I can guess is that you might not be runing
network tests, since I don't see any network test hits on the two examples.
Tr
Hi All,
I have not got to the bottom of this. Does anyone know how to report on
whether a mail is having points deducted because it is whitelisted?
Regards,
Mark
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:34:58PM +, Mark Adams wrote:
> Thanks for that,
>
> The lint has not complained about any config probl
> > -Original Message-
> > From: sushma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:55 AM
> >
> > hi,
> > Iam running spamassassin in another machine and
> relaying mails to
> > local machine(i.e i am not running spamassassin in local
> machine). In
> > this case h
> -Original Message-
> From: sushma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:55 AM
> To: SpamAssassin Users
> Subject: Query Reg spam originate to Unknown user
>
>
>
> hi,
> Iam running spamassassin in another machine and
> relaying mails to
> local machine(
And configure the milter to use the same socket location as sendmail. You have
probably only configured sendmail to use the new location and left the milter
with the old loaction.
-Sietse
From: SM
Sent: Tue 20-Mar-07 4:14
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: spamassassin not workin
> Chances are that your Bayesian database changed between the
> time you recieved this message and the time you rescanned it
> from the command line. Rescanning something is _not_ a
> reliable way to figure out what score SA gave it on receipt.
> You should use the _TESTSSCORES(,)_ macro in
> Well Rocco, without knowing a little bit more about your
> setup its hard to say. For instance, are you NEW to spamassassin?
Thanks John. No, I'm using spamassassin for two years. But, I'm going in
depth with the usage of spamassassin because I would like to reduce the
spam that arrives in my
> What version of SA are you running? If not 3.1.8 then upgrade.
# spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.1.8
running on Perl version 5.8.8
rocsca
33 matches
Mail list logo
