Richard wrote:
> Thanks all
>
> Sounds link I need to update to SA 3.2.0 or later. Normally I just wait for
> updates to come through Centos update system (Up2date) - but perhaps I
> should give it a hurry on.
3.2.0 isn't released yet.
Justin was only mentioning it because a particular deficiency
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:16:34AM +0900, Richard wrote:
> Sounds link I need to update to SA 3.2.0 or later. Normally I just wait for
> updates to come through Centos update system (Up2date) - but perhaps I
> should give it a hurry on.
Testers welcome, just be aware that 3.2 hasn't been released
you can use uridnsbl_skip_domain
to cause your domain to not be checked against uri blacklists.
that's what i was looking for.
thanks.
Thanks all
Sounds link I need to update to SA 3.2.0 or later. Normally I just wait for
updates to come through Centos update system (Up2date) - but perhaps I
should give it a hurry on.
I tried running sa-update from my root login - but got errors. I'm afraid
I'm a bit clueless with all this comma
snowcrash+spamassassin wrote:
> Perhaps I mistated my question.
>
> Why is this triggering/scoring on *MY* domain on *INBOUND* email.
>
> I can understand if it's triggering on the sender's DBP registration
> -- but it's triggering, again, on _mine_.
I understood you perfectly.
YOUR domain is list
Perhaps I mistated my question.
Why is this triggering/scoring on *MY* domain on *INBOUND* email.
I can understand if it's triggering on the sender's DBP registration
-- but it's triggering, again, on _mine_.
snowcrash+spamassassin wrote:
> in emails sent TO me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), i'm noting SA scores of,
>
> * 0.5 WHOIS_DMNBYPROXY Contains URL registered to Domains by Proxy
> * [URIs: mydomain.com]
>
> now, "mydomain.com" *IS*, in fact, reg'd @ Domains by Proxy ...
> legitimately. but,
Ok, I've got one; apparently from a gmail user to my gmail account,
then forwarded to an external account. The html links go to a
blogspot.com site, then redirect to some Pharmacy Express site.
Raw Message: http://bubba.org/spam/spam_lowscore.txt
Message renders like this: http://bubba.or
in emails sent TO me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), i'm noting SA scores of,
* 0.5 WHOIS_DMNBYPROXY Contains URL registered to Domains by Proxy
* [URIs: mydomain.com]
now, "mydomain.com" *IS*, in fact, reg'd @ Domains by Proxy ...
legitimately. but, why is it scoring on _MY_ domain
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 12:21:32AM +0200, CPTeam Hostmaster wrote:
> I don't understand what I need to do now. Could someone guide me?
Sure.
> config: configuration file "/usr/share/spamassassin/20_advance_fee.cf"
> requires version 3.001008 of SpamAssassin,
You have a rule file from 3.1.8
> bu
I checked SA from within MailScanner and got this:
--
Checking for SpamAssassin errors (if you use it)...
Using SpamAssassin results cache
Connected to SpamAssassin cache database
config: configuration file "/usr/share/spamassassin/20_advance_fee.cf"
requires version 3.001008 of SpamAssassin, but
Frank Bures wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have numerous whitelist_from_rcvd entries in
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
>
> However, when I add a whitelist_allows_relays entry, that entry is
> ignored.
>
> Example:
>
> whitelist_from_rcvd[EMAIL PROTECTED]aol.com
> whitelist_allows_relays [EMAIL PROTE
Hi everybody,
For the past couple of weeks, spamassassin has all but completely stopped
blocking email.I am running spamassassin 3.1.0 with exim 3.35.I haven't
added any custom rules or anything, it's pretty much a vanilla SA install.
In the past, some spam still got past it but it
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Damon McMahon wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'd like to integrate SpamAssassin with the sendmail vacation(1)
> autoresponder program. According to sendmail's vacation(1) man page:
I posted this a while ago - I have developed a procmail include file that
does a good amount of filt
On 3/13/2007 2:40 PM, Arjun Datta wrote:
> when milter-greylist detects a user that has passed SMTP AUTH - it does not
> delay it and adds a header:
>
> X Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP Authentication, not delayed by
> milter-greylist 0.3
>
> Now, how do I add a rule to spamassassin that assig
Hi,
I have milter-greylist running on top of spamass-milter and spamassassin.
when milter-greylist detects a user that has passed SMTP AUTH - it does not
delay it and adds a header:
X Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP Authentication, not delayed by
milter-greylist 0.3
Now, how do I add a rule to
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:49:22 +, Andrew Hodgson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please forget this, I have seen the earlier thread which I should have
looked at earlier before posting (didn't refresh headers for ages).
Andrew.
Hi.
Just wondering if anyone knows any appliance kit type distributions
with Spamassassin integrated (not necessairly free) such as E-smith
etc, that a company could install in the perimeter for spam/virus
control, managed through a web browser?
We are looking for something to replace a h
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:33:22PM +0100, Michał Jęczalik wrote:
> ~/.spamassassin/bayes_toks.expire[pid] lockfiles, that don't disappear and
Those aren't lock files, those are databases, which means that something is
killing SA before the expire finishes.
> I invoke spamd with inetd and spamc w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have numerous whitelist_from_rcvd entries in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
However, when I add a whitelist_allows_relays entry, that entry is ignored.
Example:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] aol.com
whitelist_allows_relays
John Rudd writes:
> Duane Hill wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Robert Swan wrote:
> >
> >> Richard the whitelist_from you are specifying as [EMAIL PROTECTED] but
> >> if you look at the headers below, the email comes from :
> >>
>
> >
> > According to documentation:
> >
> > The headers che
Duane Hill wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Robert Swan wrote:
Richard the whitelist_from you are specifying as [EMAIL PROTECTED] but
if you look at the headers below, the email comes from :
According to documentation:
The headers checked for whitelist addresses are as follows: if
Rese
On Monday 12 March 2007 14:32, LuKreme wrote:
> On 12-Mar-2007, at 03:26, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > Yes; see the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf(3pm) manpage, section
> > "Template tags".
>
> Thanks, but out of curiosity what did the "(3pm)" mean?
It's a more specific man section than just (3), meaning
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Robert Swan wrote:
Richard the whitelist_from you are specifying as [EMAIL PROTECTED] but
if you look at the headers below, the email comes from :
Received: from unknown (HELO n18c.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com) (69.147.64.129)
You could try putting that in your whitelist_from alth
Richard the whitelist_from you are specifying as [EMAIL PROTECTED] but
if you look at the headers below, the email comes from :
Received: from unknown (HELO n18c.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com) (69.147.64.129)
You could try putting that in your whitelist_from although whitelisting
yahoo.com might not be a
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Damon McMahon wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'd like to integrate SpamAssassin with the sendmail vacation(1)
> autoresponder program. According to sendmail's vacation(1) man page:
>
> 'Messages will not be replied to if any of the following conditions are true:
> ...
> - A ``Precede
26 matches
Mail list logo
