Re: Make Bayes more efficient?

Chris St. Pierre schrieb: We're sharing our Bayesian database (MySQL) between two MX nodes and the database server has hit a wall. It's underpowered and is no longer able to keep up with the I/O demands of our two MXes. During the day, uptime on the machine plateaus at about 5-7, and iowait per

Re: Auto-whitelist Errors & others.

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Matt Kettler wrote: > Directories should have RWX permessions, not RW. > > In Directories, X takes on a different meaning, and refers to the > ability to list files in the directory.. Without that, apps can only > open files they already know the exact name of. No the 'r' bit

Re: Auto-whitelist Errors & others.

Andrew Rosolino wrote: > > > Here is the permissions for the folder: > drw-rw-rw-2 root nobody 4096 Mar 8 14:35 spamassassin/ Directories should have RWX permessions, not RW. In Directories, X takes on a different meaning, and refers to the ability to list files in the directory.. W

Re: [2] Auto-whitelist Errors & others.

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:46:30PM -0800, Andrew Rosolino wrote: > > Why does a directory need execute permissions? For directories, the "x" bit makes it traversable. That means if /foo/ has permissions drw-rw-rw-, then you can read (and write) the directory but you can't get to any of any of th

Re: [2] Auto-whitelist Errors & others.

Thanks guys everything is good now =D! Phil Barnett wrote: > > On Thursday 08 March 2007 19:46, Andrew Rosolino wrote: >> Why does a directory need execute permissions? > > Because you can't use it and you can't move into it unless it does. > > -- > Balmer is basically saying: We know there'

Re: [2] Auto-whitelist Errors & others.

On Thursday 08 March 2007 19:46, Andrew Rosolino wrote: > Why does a directory need execute permissions? Because you can't use it and you can't move into it unless it does. -- Balmer is basically saying: We know there's a problem but we're not going to tell you what it is because we want to amb

Re: [2] Auto-whitelist Errors & others.

Why does a directory need execute permissions? Theo Van Dinter-2 wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:44:31AM -0800, Andrew Rosolino wrote: >> Mar 8 14:42:32 penguin spamd[15553]: spamd: setuid to root succeeded >> Mar 8 14:42:32 penguin spamd[15553]: spamd: still running as root: user >> no

Re: Make Bayes more efficient?

At 14:33 08-03-2007, Chris St. Pierre wrote: We're sharing our Bayesian database (MySQL) between two MX nodes and the database server has hit a wall. It's underpowered and is no What engine are you using for MySQL? InnoDB is better for Bayes. Did you look into MySQL optimization? Regards

Re: Make Bayes more efficient?

At 14:33 08-03-2007, Chris St. Pierre wrote: We're sharing our Bayesian database (MySQL) between two MX nodes and the database server has hit a wall. It's underpowered and is no What engine are you using for MySQL? InnoDB is better for Bayes. Did you look into MySQL optimization? Regards,

R: Make Bayes more efficient?

> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Chris St. Pierre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inviato: giovedì 8 marzo 2007 23.33 > A: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Oggetto: Make Bayes more efficient? > > We're sharing our Bayesian database (MySQL) between two MX nodes and > the database server has hit a w

Re: Make Bayes more efficient?

Chris St. Pierre schrieb: We're sharing our Bayesian database (MySQL) between two MX nodes and the database server has hit a wall. It's underpowered and is no longer able to keep up with the I/O demands of our two MXes. During the day, uptime on the machine plateaus at about 5-7, and iowait per

Make Bayes more efficient?

We're sharing our Bayesian database (MySQL) between two MX nodes and the database server has hit a wall. It's underpowered and is no longer able to keep up with the I/O demands of our two MXes. During the day, uptime on the machine plateaus at about 5-7, and iowait percentage rides at about 70-9

Re: Auto-whitelist Errors & others.

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:44:31AM -0800, Andrew Rosolino wrote: > Mar 8 14:42:32 penguin spamd[15553]: spamd: setuid to root succeeded > Mar 8 14:42:32 penguin spamd[15553]: spamd: still running as root: user not > specified with -u, not found, or set to root, falling back to nobody at > /usr/bi

Auto-whitelist Errors & others.

I am having some serious probles with SpamAssassin. For example check out my logs: Mar 8 14:42:32 penguin spamd[15553]: spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 52601 Mar 8 14:42:32 penguin spamd[15553]: spamd: setuid to root succeeded Mar 8 14:42:32 penguin spamd[15553]: spamd: st

Stock Spams

From the too little, too late department: The US Securities and Exchange commission has suspended trading of 35 penny stocks that were "linked" to stock spam. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070308/wr_nm/spam_sec_dc_3 the SEC is investigating the companies themselves as well as outs

Re: [SPAM] Install spamassassin

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Banyan He wrote: Hi Guys, Can anyone provide me a process how to integrate the spamassassin with postfix. I tried many times. But I cannot identify why I always get the following logs. Mar 10 05:38:26 gateway postfix/qmgr[13424]: 01A8217FBD: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=

Re: Install spamassassin

Banyan He wrote: Hi Guys, Can anyone provide me a process how to integrate the spamassassin with postfix. I tried many times. But I cannot identify why I always get the following logs. Mar 10 05:38:26 gateway postfix/qmgr[13424]: 01A8217FBD: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: pls unsubcribe me

usha chowdary wrote: pls unsubcribe me from this group From the headers: list-unsubscribe:

Submitting RBL blocks to SORBS + how to identify ADSL/etc blocks

I recently (~26 Feb 2007) submitted two RBL blocks to SORBS (85.93.37.128-85.93.37.191 and 86.212.217.0-86.212.217.255). My emails created 2 tickets on rt.sorbs.net, but the tickets remain "new", even though the autoreply said they should be handled in 24-48 hours. The tickets did get moved from t

Install spamassassin

Hi Guys, Can anyone provide me a process how to integrate the spamassassin with postfix. I tried many times. But I cannot identify why I always get the following logs. Mar 10 05:38:26 gateway postfix/qmgr[13424]: 01A8217FBD: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=25610, delays=25610/0.01/0/0

Re: NOTICE: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available

Nick Leverton writes: > On Tuesday 06 March 2007 23:53, Mark Martinec wrote: > > > Btw, the following warnings (in v320) seem excessive, a null return path > > (aka envelope sender) is normal and constitute few percent of all mail: > > > > message: envelope_sender_header '' is not an FQDN - ignor

Re: NOTICE: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available

On Tuesday 06 March 2007 23:53, Mark Martinec wrote: > Btw, the following warnings (in v320) seem excessive, a null return path > (aka envelope sender) is normal and constitute few percent of all mail: > > message: envelope_sender_header '' is not an FQDN - ignoring > at > /usr/local/lib/perl5/s

pls unsubcribe me

pls unsubcribe me from this group

Re: Custom Rule to catch this

BTW I'm not sure it's necessary to escape the space character within the [square brackets] - I think it's acceptable to just have [ ] without the \ inside. Although it doesn't do any harm having it in there either... No need to escape the space. Even better to include both space and tab chara

Re: Custom Rule to catch this

Strange indeed - not for me - I'm using The Regex Coach from http://weitz.de/regex-coach/ which so far always does a perfect job of testing regex. Maybe it's wrong on this case - who knows! :) BTW I'm not sure it's necessary to escape the space character within the [square brackets] - I think i

Re: Custom Rule to catch this

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Jeremy Fairbrass wrote: I just tested those three rules below, and none of them work with "www.superveils . com" (ie. having a space both before and after that dot). Strange, it matches rule 3 with egrep: echo 'www.superveils . com' | egrep 'www[\ ]+?\.([a-z0-9\-\ ]?)+\.[

Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?

Jim Knuth writes: > Heute (08.03.2007/03:10 Uhr) schrieb Don O'Neil, > > > Thanks that did it... :-) sa-update works great now. > > > How often are rulesets updated? Should I set sa-update to run on cron daily? > > This is indefinite. And no, not needed. Spare your ressources an > make it manu

Re: Custom Rule to catch this

I just tested those three rules below, and none of them work with "www.superveils . com" (ie. having a space both before and after that dot). You might want to try my version of this rule instead - it's attached to avoid line wraps. Works well for double-spaces in a URL (including on either si

Re: How to whitelist mail lists?

Luis, > OK, but the point is that I run SA trough AMaViS, so procmail recipes > aren't the answer. Thanks a lot, I suppose I should create some type of > whitelist in AMaViS to avoid SA. As this mailing list use VERP sender envelope addresses, you need to use regexp-based lookup table in amavisd.

Re: Spamassassin 3.1.8

On Tuesday 06 March 2007, SAtalk Mail User wrote: > Hello All, > > I have upgraded spamassassin from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 and have a easy > quiestion, When I look at the headers it still shows that Spamassassin > 3.1.7 is installed / running Why is that? I did the following --> > downloaded Mail-Spamas

Re: Custom Rule to catch this

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 10:23:05 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I searched the list and found this rule to catch URL with single space >> (www.ledrx .com). Please help me in modifying this rule to catch URL >> with double space (www.superveils . com

Re: Custom Rule to catch this

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I searched the list and found this rule to catch URL with single space (www.ledrx .com). Please help me in modifying this rule to catch URL with double space (www.superveils . com). body URL_WITH_SPACE m/\bhttp:\/\/[a-z0-9\-.]+[!*%&, -]+\.?com\b/

Spammer made me laugh today

The following was the signature of an advance fee fraud attempt: > Yours Respectfully, > Capt Aziz Hassan > > NOTE; I AM NOT AN ISLAMIC EXTREMIST, I AM MODEST. I breathe a sigh of relief. Fancy an extremist spammer; what a horrible thought! :-) -R

Re: Custom Rule to catch this

On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 03:24:20 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, > >I searched the list and found this rule to catch URL with single space >(www.ledrx .com). Please help me in modifying this rule to catch URL with >double space (www.superveils . com). > >body URL_WITH_SPACE

Re: Custom Rule to catch this

Hi, I searched the list and found this rule to catch URL with single space (www.ledrx .com). Please help me in modifying this rule to catch URL with double space (www.superveils . com). body URL_WITH_SPACE m/\bhttp:\/\/[a-z0-9\-.]+[!*%&, -]+\.?com\b/ Thanks. -Original message- From: D