Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?

On 03/07/07 Don wrote: > No, all I did is download the package and build/install it. > I tried running sa-update just now and got this: > error: gpg required but not found! try this sa-update -D --nogpg -- |_|0|_| Maciej Friedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |_|_|0| http://wwv.pl - usługi hostingowe |0

Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?

Heute (08.03.2007/03:10 Uhr) schrieb Don O'Neil, > Thanks that did it... :-) sa-update works great now. > How often are rulesets updated? Should I set sa-update to run on cron daily? This is indefinite. And no, not needed. Spare your ressources an make it manually. ;) -- Viele Gruesse, Kind r

Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?

Heute (08.03.2007/02:34 Uhr) schrieb Don O'Neil, > What is gpg and where do I get it? I couldn't find any reference to it on > the spamassassin.org page. Please don`t top post. Which OS you are using? On Debian: apt-cache search gpg -- Viele Gruesse, Kind regards, Jim Knuth [EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?

Thanks that did it... :-) sa-update works great now. How often are rulesets updated? Should I set sa-update to run on cron daily? -Original Message- From: David Goldsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 5:49 PM To: spam mailling list Subject: Re: Upgraded from

Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok, as soon as I hit Send, I realized this is only half the answer. The second half is: GnuPG - http://www.gnupg.org/ David Goldsmith David Goldsmith wrote: > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates > > David Goldsmith > > Don O'Neil wrote

Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates David Goldsmith Don O'Neil wrote: > What is gpg and where do I get it? I couldn't find any reference to it on > the spamassassin.org page. > > -Original Message- > From: Jim Knuth [mailto:[EMA

RE: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?

What is gpg and where do I get it? I couldn't find any reference to it on the spamassassin.org page. -Original Message- From: Jim Knuth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 5:25 PM To: Don O'Neil Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3

Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?

Heute (08.03.2007/02:02 Uhr) schrieb Don O'Neil, > No, all I did is download the package and build/install it. > I tried running sa-update just now and got this: > error: gpg required but not found! > I have no idea what this means. you have no gpg installed ;) > -Original Message- >

RE: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?

No, all I did is download the package and build/install it. I tried running sa-update just now and got this: error: gpg required but not found! I have no idea what this means. -Original Message- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 4:53 PM To:

Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:47:26PM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote: > Anyone know why when I upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 my filtering performance > would go down? If you use sa-update, did you run it after updating? -- Randomly Selected Tagline: "From what I'd seen of British TV, some shows use the wor

Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?

Anyone know why when I upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 my filtering performance would go down? A lot more spam seems to be getting through since I updated yesterday. Maybe it's just a lucky coincedence... But I'm wondering if there is some configration tweak I did before that got overwritten... Any i

MySQL user_prefs

Hi. I'm trying to setup Spamassassin to use user_prefs from MySQL for a Qmail/Vpopmail installation. I addedd this in /etc/spamassassin/local.cf: user_scores_dsn DBI:mysql:spamassassin:localhost user_scores_sql_usernamespamassassin user_scores_sql_passwordspampa

Bayes Help needed

I'm running SpamAssassin 3.1.8 on a SLES10 box with Postfix/Amavis/Maia mailguard. Bayes database is stored in MySQL using the following config: (Usernames and passwords obscured) # Bayes database configuration use_bayes 1 bayes_store_module Mail::Spam

Re: No Access to local.cf

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:11:00PM -0500, Don Ireland wrote: > My host says they allow local.cf to be used. Is there a certain section of > the docs that tells what can and can not be used in that file somewhere? Everything in the doc (perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf) can be done from local.cf.

Re: No Access to local.cf

My host says they allow local.cf to be used. Is there a certain section of the docs that tells what can and can not be used in that file somewhere? Can this be used to tell it to use my own bayes file(s)? I have a PHP script that passes messages to spamc in case that matters. TIA! Don Ireland

mass-check on Windows?

Has anyone managed to get mass-check to run correctly on windows? J:\masscheck>perl ./masses/mass-check -c=./rules -j=1 --progress --debug --noisy --showdots --reuse ham:dir:./ham spam:dir:/spam spam:dir:./spam The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect. Can't locate J:/

Re: No Access to local.cf

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:52:10PM -, Jim Moyes wrote: > Is there any other location I can use .cf files as the user_prefs file could > become > quite large after a while. It depends on what your hosting company allows you to do. If you run spamassassin or your own spamd, you can change the

RE: Spamhaus Tests

Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > Cliff Stanford wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Justin Mason wrote: > > > > > Yes -- in SpamAssassin 3.2.0, it's picking up a more useful score: > > > 0.509 in set 1 and 0.905 in set 3. (Not a huge score, but that's > > > where the

No Access to local.cf

My Spamassassin config files (local.cf) are outwith the area I have access to as my hosting company do not let users have access to this area. = /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf As a new user I am currently using a user_prefs file which appears to be working as expected. Is there any other locat

Re: Spamhaus Tests

Cliff Stanford wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Justin Mason wrote: Yes -- in SpamAssassin 3.2.0, it's picking up a more useful score: 0.509 in set 1 and 0.905 in set 3. (Not a huge score, but that's where the GA set it... its optimal score, given FPs and other rules it ov

RE: Spamhaus Tests

> > I've just spotted a major flaw then that's going to hit me when this > changes. > > Not being an ISP, I have no idea what my users' IP addresses are at any > given time. They authenticate when using SMTP so that I will accept and > forward the mail but may well be using an ISP dial-up or DSL

Re: qmailmrtg7 statistics about SA

Hi, > We did it by running spamd under daemontools. We use MailScanner now, > but I still have the setup on what used to be our spamd server. Thanks a lot. I'm going to configure my system like yours Warm regards, Mário Gamito

Re: Whitelist scoring question

Thanks for that, The lint has not complained about any config problems with the line you have suggested. Do you know a quick and easy way of testing whether the whitelisting is working correctly? I have a reporting template setup as below, but this never shows any whitelist hits. (I'm probably jus

Re: Spamhaus Tests

Justin Mason wrote: > Matt Kettler writes: > >> However, be aware that I'm merely a "helpful community member" and my >> opinions on the list uses are purely non-official. >> > > But almost always right ;) > That's partly because of knowledge, and partly because I'm good at constructing

Re: qmailmrtg7 statistics about SA

Mário Gamito wrote: Hi, Is there someone here using qmailmrtg7 that could give me a hint about how to configure qmail.mrtg conf file for spamassassin ? Any help would be appreciated. Warm Regards, Mário Gamito We did it by running spamd under daemontools. We use MailScanner now, but I sti

Re: qmailmrtg7 statistics about SA

Mário Gamito wrote: Hi, Is there someone here using qmailmrtg7 that could give me a hint about how to configure qmail.mrtg conf file for spamassassin ? Any help would be appreciated. Hi, What would you like to know ? I'd more than happy to help you out, most likely off-list. Regards, R

Re: Custom Rule to catch this

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does anyone have written a custom rule to catch this spam? > > It would of great help. > > Thanks. > > -Original Message- > From: Carmella Boehm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 6:51 P

qmailmrtg7 statistics about SA

Hi, Is there someone here using qmailmrtg7 that could give me a hint about how to configure qmail.mrtg conf file for spamassassin ? Any help would be appreciated. Warm Regards, Mário Gamito

Re: Whitelist scoring question

Mark Adams wrote: Hi All, Quick questions regarding whitelisting. I have read that whitelisting applies -50 points whether using whitelist_from or whitelist_from_rcvd. My question is can this amount be altered? Thanks for any help. Regards, Mark Yes edit your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local

Re: Spamhaus Tests

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Justin Mason wrote: > Yes -- in SpamAssassin 3.2.0, it's picking up a more useful score: > 0.509 in set 1 and 0.905 in set 3. (Not a huge score, but that's > where the GA set it... its optimal score, given FPs and other > rules it overlaps with.) I'

Re: Spamhaus Tests

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Kettler wrote: > However, be aware that I'm merely a "helpful community member" and my > opinions on the list uses are purely non-official. Thank you, that was all very helpful. Cliff. - -- Cliff Stanford Might Limited

Re: User or Admin?

Sorry Gang--don't know why that went out a second time. Don Ireland -Original Message- From: "Don Ireland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, Mar 7, 2007 7:27 am Subject: User or Admin? To: Hello all! I have a shared hosting account. My host has Exim installed as the mail server and

Custom Rule to catch this

Does anyone have written a custom rule to catch this spam? It would of great help. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Carmella Boehm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 6:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Account Info Friendly Reminder; Get your desired product

Whitelist scoring question

Hi All, Quick questions regarding whitelisting. I have read that whitelisting applies -50 points whether using whitelist_from or whitelist_from_rcvd. My question is can this amount be altered? Thanks for any help. Regards, Mark

User or Admin?

Hello all! I have a shared hosting account. My host has Exim installed as the mail server and has SA installed. I have three domains (1 for personal use and 2 for small businesses--one man operations). Should I be looking at the docs written for users or for admins? If I use Bayesian f

Re: NOTICE: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available

> > > SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 is released! > > Looks fine Btw, the following warnings (in v320) seem excessive, a null return path (aka envelope sender) is normal and constitute few percent of all mail: message: envelope_sender_header '' is not an FQDN - ignoring at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_pe

SA 3.2 lint errors or me?

I've disabled D's Imageinfo plugin. # loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::ImageInfo sa-update update fails due to lint error: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule DC_GIF_UNO_LARGO config: warning: score set for non-existent rule DC_PNG_UNO_LARGO config: warning: score set for non

Re: NOTICE: SpamAssassin 3.2.0-pre2 PRERELEASE available

Jim Knuth writes: > Heute (07.03.2007/01:42 Uhr) schrieb Randal, Phil, > > > 127/8 is now always trusted. > > > Remove that "trusted_networks 127/8" line and all should be well. > > Are then still other changes, which are not explained in Changes > or INSTALL? They're all in the Changes -- but

Re: Spamhaus Tests

Matt Kettler writes: > Cliff Stanford wrote: > > Some questions: > > > > 1. RCVD_IN_XBL > > > > Why is this only applied by default to -lastexternal rather than all the > > Received: lines? Surely if any forwarding host is a known exploit, it > > should score the same 3.897 ? > The problem her

FW: User or Admin?

I also seem to have user-level account config of SA. Can anyone tell me where (if at all) I can put the local.cf file I am using a user_prefs file at the moment. Jim Moyes mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 07 March