RE: scan internal email? SA and exchange server?

2007-01-21 Thread Gary V
How do I scan internal to internal, exchange server only email? It never seems to leave the exchange server. If your clients connect directly to the Exchange server there would be no reason for mail addressed to local recipients to leave the box. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO I imagine you o

Re: scan internal email? SA and exchange server?

2007-01-21 Thread d.hill
Sorry for the repeat and response to my own message. Must have skipped over the tail end of Gary's response. Must read more thorough next time. On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 05:02:25 + <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:00:26 -0500 Michael Scheidell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I can

Re: scan internal email? SA and exchange server?

2007-01-21 Thread Theo Van Dinter
My question is: why would you want to scan internal-only email? Are your users sending spam to other users? If so, have an Acceptable Use Policy that forbids such things and then if it happens you can take appropriate action against your user. On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:55:12PM -0700, Gary V wro

Re: scan internal email? SA and exchange server?

2007-01-21 Thread d.hill
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:00:26 -0500 Michael Scheidell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I can scan incoming spam by MX record on my external box before it gets to exchange.server. I can can outgoing email by setting the external box as smarthost in exchange. How do I scan internal to internal, excha

RE: scan internal email? SA and exchange server?

2007-01-21 Thread Gary V
I can scan incoming spam by MX record on my external box before it gets to exchange.server. I can can outgoing email by setting the external box as smarthost in exchange. How do I scan internal to internal, exchange server only email? It never seems to leave the exchange server. If your client

scan internal email? SA and exchange server?

2007-01-21 Thread Michael Scheidell
I can scan incoming spam by MX record on my external box before it gets to exchange.server. I can can outgoing email by setting the external box as smarthost in exchange. How do I scan internal to internal, exchange server only email? It never seems to leave the exchange server. -- Michael Sche

Re: debug output

2007-01-21 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 07:43:11PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote: > But call this directly from my "main" script eg: > > Mail::SpamAssassin::Logger::add(method => 'file', filename => > '/var/log/syslog') > ?? Yes, but I wouldn't log to the same file that syslog is going to write to... Just use the sy

Re: debug output

2007-01-21 Thread Tom Allison
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 07:17:14PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote: When using Mail::SpamAssassin with new( {debug => 'all'} ) or similar How do you capture the output from the debug to syslog or other logging file? Take a look at Mail::SpamAssassin::Logger. ie: Mail::Sp

Re: debug output

2007-01-21 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 07:17:14PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote: > When using Mail::SpamAssassin with new( {debug => 'all'} ) or similar > How do you capture the output from the debug to syslog or other logging > file? Take a look at Mail::SpamAssassin::Logger. ie: Mail::SpamAssassin::Logger::a

debug output

2007-01-21 Thread Tom Allison
When using Mail::SpamAssassin with new( {debug => 'all'} ) or similar How do you capture the output from the debug to syslog or other logging file? I can run it via a command line but if I run Mail::SpamAssassin under a daemon/fork process similar to Net::Server::PreForkSimple I can't seem

Re: Header processsing not working.

2007-01-21 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 10:14:51PM +0100, J. W. Andersen wrote: > >It sounds more like your system isn't properly passing the message to SA. > As all my body tests seem to work OK, I guess the messages *are* passed > to SA. Unless there is > reason to believe, that postfix or amavis should block t

restart from scratch with 3.1.7 ???

2007-01-21 Thread R Lists06
Greetings My SA 3.1.7 installs run as user spamd My /home/spamd/.spamassassin directory looks like this -rw--- 1 spamd spamd 5210112 Jan 21 14:25 auto-whitelist -rw--- 1 spamd spamd 60864 Jan 21 14:25 bayes_journal -rw--- 1 spamd spamd 2711552 Jan 21 14:18 bayes_seen -rw---

Re: Header processsing not working.

2007-01-21 Thread J. W. Andersen
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:30:48PM +0100, J. W. Andersen wrote: Am I severely misunderstanding something ? Such as definitions of header (subject) and body ? It sounds more like your system isn't properly passing the message to SA. As all my body tests seem

Re: Header processsing not working.

2007-01-21 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:30:48PM +0100, J. W. Andersen wrote: > Am I severely misunderstanding something ? Such as definitions of header > (subject) and body ? It sounds more like your system isn't properly passing the message to SA. > The Scenario here is SuSE 10. SpamAssassin is 3.1.7 (initia

Header processsing not working.

2007-01-21 Thread J. W. Andersen
I seem to have a problem processing headers in spamassassin. First, on every single mail I receive, i get a MISSING_SUBJECT condition, and the mail does have a valid subject. Second, I can never make a match in the subject line. In the local.cf, I have the following: ..

Re: bayes 101

2007-01-21 Thread Gary V
OK, I removed the bayes directory such that /var/cache/spampd is a directory but there is nothing 'bayes' in that directory (no file, no dir) cd /var/cache/spampd rm -rf bayes /etc/spampd.conf: bayes_path /var/cache/spampd/bayes restart and [6651] dbg: bayes: no dbs present, cannot

Re: bayes 101

2007-01-21 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Sunday 21 January 2007 16:44, Matt Kettler wrote: > Tom Allison wrote: > > [5411] info: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, > > "/var/cache/spampd/bayes" is not valid for "bayes_path", skipping: > > bayes_path /var/cache/spampd/bayes > > > > debug helped. But what does it mean? > > Is th

Re: bayes 101

2007-01-21 Thread Tom Allison
Matt Kettler wrote: Tom Allison wrote: Tom Allison wrote: I just did an install of spampd on my debian box and am working my way through the different configurations... First, I found that /var/cache/spampd/awl had the wrong permissions so I changed that and I stopped getting errors. Interest

unofficial SpamAssassin 3.2.0 not-a-prerelease tarball available

2007-01-21 Thread Justin Mason
Hi all -- there's an extremely unofficial SpamAssassin 3.2.0 tarball available at: http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0-pre1.tar.bz2 http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0-pre1.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0-pre1.z

Re: bayes 101

2007-01-21 Thread Matt Kettler
Tom Allison wrote: > Tom Allison wrote: >> I just did an install of spampd on my debian box and am working my >> way through the different configurations... >> >> First, I found that /var/cache/spampd/awl had the wrong permissions >> so I changed that and I stopped getting errors. Interestingly, I

Re: bayes 101

2007-01-21 Thread Tom Allison
Tom Allison wrote: I just did an install of spampd on my debian box and am working my way through the different configurations... First, I found that /var/cache/spampd/awl had the wrong permissions so I changed that and I stopped getting errors. Interestingly, I have AWL disabled. But I gue

bayes 101

2007-01-21 Thread Tom Allison
I just did an install of spampd on my debian box and am working my way through the different configurations... First, I found that /var/cache/spampd/awl had the wrong permissions so I changed that and I stopped getting errors. Interestingly, I have AWL disabled. But I guess it likes to check