On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 09:10:32PM -0500, Michael W. Cocke wrote:
> I was told a while back that the best way to extract urls from emails
> was to use code from SpamAssassin. Ok - Now, I need to do just that.
> Any pointers? I've looked thru the code in SpamCopURI, but unless there
> are some
I was told a while back that the best way to extract urls from emails
was to use code from SpamAssassin. Ok - Now, I need to do just that.
Any pointers? I've looked thru the code in SpamCopURI, but unless there
are some docs hidden somewhere I can't even figure out the entry point.
Are there
--As of January 12, 2007 7:08:18 PM -0600, Shane Williams is alleged to
have said:
System is Darwin, running Postfix. The sign-up message for this list got
those rules triggered. (_Everything_ triggers them.)
This is just a guess, but is it possible that OS X's use of carriage
returns is ma
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Fri, January 12, 2007 2:34 pm, Theo Van Dinter said:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:14:31PM -0500, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
Just wondering if anyone else is having the rules
'MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,TO_CC_NONE' _always_ trigger? (That is,
for ever
--As of January 12, 2007 12:40:00 PM -0800, John D. Hardin is alleged to
have said:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
I am scanning mail via a procmail recipe
Anything in that configuration that you can think of that would
mess up those headers? I can post a set if you would like.
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:37:01 -0800, "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "Giampaolo Tomassoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Ok, who installed the swartasam blocker for techworld?
>>
>> All of a sudden, they say that worldwide spam levels have drop
Marc Perkel wrote:
What do the letters IBK mean in the prefork child states line. SA seems
to be using more ram than usual and I'm trying to figure out why.
i - idle
b - busy
k - being killed (over max-child or max-connections, etc)
HTH,
Rick
Marc Perkel wrote:
What do the letters IBK mean in the prefork child states line. SA seems
to be using more ram than usual and I'm trying to figure out why.
I Bought Kalua, or Idle Busy Killing, whichever you prefer.
Daryl
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
> I am scanning mail via a procmail recipe
>
> Anything in that configuration that you can think of that would
> mess up those headers? I can post a set if you would like.
There are procmail flags that allow passing only the message body text
to the
What do the letters IBK mean in the prefork child states line. SA seems
to be using more ram than usual and I'm trying to figure out why.
On Fri, January 12, 2007 2:34 pm, Theo Van Dinter said:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:14:31PM -0500, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
>> Just wondering if anyone else is having the rules
>> 'MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,TO_CC_NONE' _always_ trigger? (That is,
>> for every single message that comes through my
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:14:31PM -0500, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone else is having the rules
> 'MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,TO_CC_NONE' _always_ trigger? (That is, for
> every single message that comes through my system, regardless of anything
> else.) I've set them to sco
Just wondering if anyone else is having the rules
'MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,TO_CC_NONE' _always_ trigger? (That is, for
every single message that comes through my system, regardless of anything
else.) I've set them to score at zero, but I assume they are supposed to
check for some specific co
Roman Serbski wrote:
>
> Thank you Matt,
>
> SA is called globally through qmail-scanner-st. I mean globally since
> I define QMAILQUEUE in /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run file. It
> can be also called from tcp.smtp on IP basis but in this case virus
> protection becomes also disabled which I
This is what I see in my small personal sample. I average about 250
personal (mail to me) spams a day, which tends to drop 25% or so for a
day or two each weekend. On the New Years weekend, that drop was
something like 50% for 3 days, then came right back. I attributed it to
partying and the
Heute (12.01.2007/11:51 Uhr) schrieb A Mennucc,
> hi
> netpbm in Debian is 10.1 ; so it is too old
> I asked for a newer one in
> http://bugs.debian.org/159847
> Jim Knuth ha scritto:
>>
>> I`ve forgotten: libnetpbm10-dev (Debian Etch)
>>
>>
> what do you mean by this ?
I mean: This
From: "Giampaolo Tomassoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, who installed the swartasam blocker for techworld?
All of a sudden, they say that worldwide spam levels have dropped.
I don't think I see any sudden drop, was the worlds #1 spammer in that
hut
hi
netpbm in Debian is 10.1 ; so it is too old
I asked for a newer one in
http://bugs.debian.org/159847
Jim Knuth ha scritto:
>
> I`ve forgotten: libnetpbm10-dev (Debian Etch)
>
>
what do you mean by this ?
a.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Tony Finch wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I don't think I see any sudden drop, was the worlds #1 spammer in that
hut in fluga that got bombed last night?
I haven't seen any drop recently either. For my systems (daily legit
volume 300,000 and spam 10x that) the spam peak
19 matches
Mail list logo
