Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>>
>> Hmm, have you tried hitting the local named with queryperf (it's a DNS
>> mass-querry load-test.)
>
> Haven't yet. Was also going to try turning on the querylog (I turn it
> on via rndc but I'm not getting output an
Geoff Soper wrote:
> I've recently moved from calling spamassasin to using spamc/spamd. Today
> I had a "/etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd restart" fail with the message "Unknown
> option: a". Googling this led me to the /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin and
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd files, both of which specified t
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 03:39:30AM +, Geoff Soper wrote:
> What would the "a" option be and why did the two files specify it when
> spamd doesn't accept it?
No idea. Neither spamassassin nor spamd have/had a "-a" option from
what I can see. Some crazy distribution's add-on ?
--
Randomly S
I've recently moved from calling spamassasin to using spamc/spamd. Today
I had a "/etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd restart" fail with the message "Unknown
option: a". Googling this led me to the /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin and
/etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd files, both of which specified the "a" option
(the form
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Matt Kettler wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
ie: is the localhost DNS server working properly?
Yes, it is. I'm not seeing any major errors in /var/log/messages, and
I'm seeing some rules match on this. It would be quasi-helpful if the
error logged what lookup w
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>>
>>
>> ie: is the localhost DNS server working properly?
>
> Yes, it is. I'm not seeing any major errors in /var/log/messages, and
> I'm seeing some rules match on this. It would be quasi-helpful if the
> error logged what lookup was actually timing out (i.e.
>
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Matt Kettler wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Any idea what could be causing the following?
DNS is against localhost, net::dns is 0.59
I'm seeing a ton of this in my ddebug log:
Jan 5 16:37:14 quark spamd[2031]: dns: timeout for
sorbs-lastexternal,sorbs after 11 s
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>
>> You do realize the AWL isn't a whitelist, right?
>
> Why is it hitting, then? If it has the power to influence the score
> hamward (on a non-real and possibly forged email address), I'd prefer
> it not to apply.
Well, first, back to the point. The AWL is an a
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Matt Kettler wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey all,
The subject line says it all. I've got a lot of users complaining
about bounce spam, and while there's an 0.1 scoring "Vbounce" ruleset,
I notice that more often than not "postmaster" scores sometimes a
whopping
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Any idea what could be causing the following?
>
> DNS is against localhost, net::dns is 0.59
>
> I'm seeing a ton of this in my ddebug log:
>
> Jan 5 16:37:14 quark spamd[2031]: dns: timeout for
> sorbs-lastexternal,sorbs after 11 seconds
Try "dig @localhost www
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> The subject line says it all. I've got a lot of users complaining
> about bounce spam, and while there's an 0.1 scoring "Vbounce" ruleset,
> I notice that more often than not "postmaster" scores sometimes a
> whopping .5, and at other times -17. Is
Hey all,
The subject line says it all. I've got a lot of users complaining about
bounce spam, and while there's an 0.1 scoring "Vbounce" ruleset, I notice
that more often than not "postmaster" scores sometimes a whopping .5, and
at other times -17. Is there any way to simply say "dont do thi
Personally, I think the AWL function is poorly named as it really does not
reflect what it is or does. I suspect this name leads to much confusion for
most new users and/or those that do not work closely with SA consistently. I
know when I first started using SA, it confused me in the beginning. Ma
thanks Dan. I'll check it out.
Re,
Clay
>>> On 1/5/2007 at 4:20 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Dan Barker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Clay,
You have several replies about the difference between CR/LF and LF,
but
nothing useful.
To "LOOK" at the files, use Wordpad instead of Notepad. It ha
skuba wrote:
If my auto white list is on, does it mean that the manual white list won't
work? Or could both be ON at the same time?
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist for explanation of
AWL.
--
Chris
John Rudd wrote:
Clay Davis wrote:
Can someone give me an idea what is causing this and of its causing a
problem with my SA config?
I am using wget to ftp download several of the SARE rules on a weekly
basis. When I look at the rule on the SARE site, its formatting looks
normal (spaces, tabs
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 05:17:40PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Question - how do I tell if network plugins are working?
>
> I am not seeing any mention in headers of Razor or Pyzor. I have
> looked for logs for these apps, and have not found anything.
[...]
> see what the standard FreeBSD
Hello list,
First, thanks to the gurus who have worked so hard on SA. I feel
like I have gained a new life now that the spam has slowed to a
trickle. I have read a lot of the documentation on the wiki site,
but am still not sure if I have my initial configuration
optimized. (Actually, I ge
Thanks. I will do some more tests.
Theo Van Dinter-2 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:49:24AM -0800, skuba wrote:
>> even though I add certain senders to whitelist prefs, they still get
>> labeled
>> as spam because the whitelist score is very low. How could I increase
>> that
>> in the pr
Any idea what could be causing the following?
DNS is against localhost, net::dns is 0.59
I'm seeing a ton of this in my ddebug log:
Jan 5 16:37:14 quark spamd[2031]: dns: timeout for
sorbs-lastexternal,sorbs after 11 seconds
Jan 5 16:37:14 quark spamd[2027]: dns: timeout for rfci_envfrom aft
Clay,
You have several replies about the difference between CR/LF and LF, but
nothing useful.
To "LOOK" at the files, use Wordpad instead of Notepad. It handles either
line end.
SpamAssassin (actually perl) doesn't care in this instance. FTP'ing them in
ASCII won't hurt anything, but why mess wi
thanks, neal. crimson reads it just fine.
clay
>>> On 1/5/2007 at 2:52 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Coffey, Neal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Clay Davis wrote:
> I am using wget to ftp download several of the SARE rules on a
weekly
> basis. When I look at the rule on the SARE site, its fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Amavis uses SA's config file for rules, scores, and plugins. Just
> > keep in mind that it may be looking in a non-standard place for the
> > config depending on your setup.
> >
> > Amavis adds some extra scoring on top of the SA score and does it's
> > own mar
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:50:36AM -0800, skuba wrote:
> If my auto white list is on, does it mean that the manual white list won't
> work? Or could both be ON at the same time?
The AWL (score averager) is completely independent of everything else.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
Inoculatte: To ta
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:49:24AM -0800, skuba wrote:
> even though I add certain senders to whitelist prefs, they still get labeled
> as spam because the whitelist score is very low. How could I increase that
> in the prefs file?
The default is -100, which should be quite sufficient. Have you a
Clay Davis wrote:
> I am using wget to ftp download several of the SARE rules on a weekly
> basis. When I look at the rule on the SARE site, its formatting looks
> normal (spaces, tabs, indents, etc.); however, after an ftp download
> to my PC and opening it in Notepad, its all run together and al
If my auto white list is on, does it mean that the manual white list won't
work? Or could both be ON at the same time?
Thanks so much
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Does-AWL-cancel-Manual-Whitelist--tf2927595.html#a8184649
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list
Hi,
even though I add certain senders to whitelist prefs, they still get labeled
as spam because the whitelist score is very low. How could I increase that
in the prefs file?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-increase-Manual-Whitelist-score--tf2927585.html#a81
Clay Davis wrote:
Can someone give me an idea what is causing this and of its causing a
problem with my SA config?
I am using wget to ftp download several of the SARE rules on a weekly
basis. When I look at the rule on the SARE site, its formatting looks
normal (spaces, tabs, indents, etc.);
Can someone give me an idea what is causing this and of its causing a
problem with my SA config?
I am using wget to ftp download several of the SARE rules on a weekly
basis. When I look at the rule on the SARE site, its formatting looks
normal (spaces, tabs, indents, etc.); however, after an ftp
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Darn. I thought that might be
the problem. Well, back to square one.
>> You are right, this
is not the right list for amavisd questions, but
>> where do
you draw the line?
>
> If the question is about rules,
scoring or plugins, ask it here. If the
> question is abo
We rarely get mail from new people (apart from spam), so I'd like to be able
to detect if someone is sending mail for the first time and to add a score.
I've been trying to use some rules to see what the AWL count is but not
having any success. I don't want to do greylisting but would be interes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Darn. I thought that might be the problem. Well, back to square one.
> You are right, this is not the right list for amavisd questions, but
> where do you draw the line?
If the question is about rules, scoring or plugins, ask it here. If the
question is about markup a
On Thursday 04 January 2007 10:03 pm, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
>
> That's not the one I'm having trouble with. Both of Dallas' scripts
> work fine. It's the sa-stats.pl script that is bundled with SA
> (produces a quite different report) that does unpleasant things when
> used with the current (v1.
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, John Rudd wrote:
> Jens Schleusener wrote:
> >
> >
> > But "undefining" the variable "botnet_pass_trusted" I got
> >
>
> Forgot to ask this last time:
>
> what do you mean "undefining"? Did you set it to "none", like the
> documentation mentions? or anything else along th
Darn. I thought that might be the problem. Well, back to square one. You
are right, this is not the right list for amavisd questions, but where do
you draw the line?
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 03:49:35PM
-0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> So, the bayes_path is set in
my local.cf files and it poin
Jens Schleusener wrote:
But "undefining" the variable "botnet_pass_trusted" I got
Forgot to ask this last time:
what do you mean "undefining"? Did you set it to "none", like the
documentation mentions? or anything else along those lines?
Steve Pfister wrote:
Is it possible to get Botnet-0.6 anywhere? I'm having some trouble getting
Botnet-0.7 to work and I'd like to try it.
If it's the same problem you already posted about (Net::DNS::Resolver),
then:
a) I don't know how to help you... the only thing I can think of is to
ch
38 matches
Mail list logo
