Re: SA-UPDATE and recent branches/3.1 rules?

2006-12-31 Thread Phil Barnett
On Monday 01 January 2007 01:46, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 01:41:33AM -0500, Phil Barnett wrote: > > So, does that mean that sa_update brings the update to my machine and > > then I have to do something else or that I have to run sa_update to bring > > them and install them?

Re: SA-UPDATE and recent branches/3.1 rules?

2006-12-31 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 01:41:33AM -0500, Phil Barnett wrote: > So, does that mean that sa_update brings the update to my machine and then I > have to do something else or that I have to run sa_update to bring them and > install them? That's basically the same thing. "man sa-update" and reading

Re: SA-UPDATE and recent branches/3.1 rules?

2006-12-31 Thread Phil Barnett
On Monday 01 January 2007 01:23, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > Generally, updates get put in, and then whenever someone feels like pushing > it, they can.  I usually put in small commits for specific sets of rules, > and could do multiple edits before I want an update to occur. So, does that mean that

Re: SA-UPDATE and recent branches/3.1 rules?

2006-12-31 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 09:11:08PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: > Is there some process that needs to be automated to ship out the 3.1 > branch rules changes via sa-update? At the moment, we push out the updates manually. It could be automated (I already have a script that does 95% of it, which I

SA-UPDATE and recent branches/3.1 rules?

2006-12-31 Thread Larry Rosenman
Is there some process that needs to be automated to ship out the 3.1 branch rules changes via sa-update? I know I've seen commits to branches/3.1, but no sa-update since 12/19 Just asking... -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683

Re: --lint test fails

2006-12-31 Thread Vernon Webb
That did it thanks. It was in the local.cf file.

Re: --lint test fails

2006-12-31 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 05:30:39PM -0500, Vernon Webb wrote: > > 2) "pyzor_add_header" isn't a valid config option. See "perldoc > > Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor" for more info. Perhaps you want to just > > use the add_header option with the _PYZOR_ tag? (see "perldoc > > Mail::SpamAssas

Re: --lint test fails

2006-12-31 Thread Vernon Webb
> 2) "pyzor_add_header" isn't a valid config option. See "perldoc > Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor" for more info. Perhaps you want to just > use the add_header option with the _PYZOR_ tag? (see "perldoc > Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf" for info on that) I'm sorry I know how tired people get

Re: sa + bayes/sqlite _performance_? reasons _not_ to use it?

2006-12-31 Thread snowcrash+spamassassin
There are no published performance numbers for using SQLite because it is so slow I gave up the tests, deciding it was not even worth the effort. When I say slow, I mean 15+ hrs to do what even the basic SQL storage module on MySQL on MySQL could do in < 5 mins. 15+ hours vs 5 minutes ??!! i d

Re: sa + bayes/sqlite _performance_? reasons _not_ to use it?

2006-12-31 Thread Michael Parker
snowcrash+spamassassin wrote: > i'm interested in using sqlite across my 'entire' mail server env. > currently, exim+dovecot+spamassassin. > > i know sqlite _can_ be used for bayes db in sa. lots of info on that. > > any reasons it should NOT be used? > > i'm guessing performance, compared to d

sa + bayes/sqlite _performance_? reasons _not_ to use it?

2006-12-31 Thread snowcrash+spamassassin
i'm interested in using sqlite across my 'entire' mail server env. currently, exim+dovecot+spamassassin. i know sqlite _can_ be used for bayes db in sa. lots of info on that. any reasons it should NOT be used? i'm guessing performance, compared to dbm, might be an issue, but other than a comme

awl in sql?

2006-12-31 Thread Pavel Urban
Hello, I have awl database stored in MySQL and wonder - is this database supposed to grow 'forever' or is/should be purged somehow? I don't feel comfortable with something that may silently eat up the whole disk space... SA 3.1.7, RH Linux 4 bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssas

RE: Even senators sending image spam

2006-12-31 Thread vertito
pls, can you forward me a copy of that email copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] tnx -Original Message- From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 3:02 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Even senators sending image spam Just g

Re: Botnet 0.7 Plugin is available

2006-12-31 Thread Thomas Bolioli
See below for content. I forgot to send this to the list. John Rudd wrote: Thomas Bolioli wrote: It seems to have an issue with mail sent through forwarders like alumni accounts and one mail type systems. I am sending you a note off line with the details. No... it doesn't look that way at a

Even senators sending image spam

2006-12-31 Thread Michael Scheidell
Just got (and CAUGHT!!!) image spam from one of the Florida Senators. Imageplugin.pm helped catch it, along with SARE_GIF, and other plugins. Thanks to all who share to help keep the net spam free (and shame on you Bill Nelson. Too bad you folks put an exemption in the CAN-SPAM law for 'politica