Re: Mail-Redirection and SA should use the second Received-Line ...

Wolfgang Uhr wrote: > Hello > > Sorry, but I don't be able to find an answer, either in the > documentation or in the faq. > > In a mail-redirection, all SA tests schould be driven on to the second > Received-Line. Is there any parameter to handle this situation? > > Thanks for all help. > decl

moving/adding bayes info to global DB

Hi there. For some time now, I have been busily accumulating bayes data by running sa-learn on various collections of emails. As myself, so I now have a nice big chunk o'data in ~/.spamassassin. Since I am a newbie to SA, I didn't realise what was happening for some time. I actually wanted that d

Re: Recognizing Sendmail's authentication -- patch included (WAS: How is LOCAL_AUTH_RCVD used?)

This is now bug 5235 http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5235

Mail-Redirection and SA should use the second Received-Line ...

Hello Sorry, but I don't be able to find an answer, either in the documentation or in the faq. In a mail-redirection, all SA tests schould be driven on to the second Received-Line. Is there any parameter to handle this situation? Thanks for all help. Best regards Wolfgang

RE: Is there a way to tell spam assassin to avoid any processing of local emails?

> -Original Message- > From: Peter M. Abraham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2006 5:30 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Is there a way to tell spam assassin to avoid any processing of > local emails? > > > > ___

Re: Is there a way to tell spam assassin to avoid any processing of local emails?

On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Peter M. Abraham wrote: > Is there a way to tell Spam Assassin (SpamAssassin 3.1.7) to skip > processing emails sent from our network (public IP addresses are > involved)? > > I do have TrustedNeworks set up, but I don't know if there is > another variable that must also be se

Re: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently

On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 11:15:16AM -, Sujit Choudhury wrote: > sa-update puts the files into /var/lib directory. However, spamassassin -D > --lint shows the files are read from /var/lib directory where as spamd > program in actual fact points to /usr/share/spamassassin. What do you mean by

Re: bayes db site wide or per user

On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 01:48:51PM +0100, Alex Handle wrote: > I could disable the spamchecks in amavisd-new and invoke sa through > maildrop. > But i don't know if a per-user database would scale for 100,000 mailboxes? IMO, Bayes will likely be ok if you use SQL (though your DB will be quite a bi

Re: Is there a way to tell spam assassin to avoid any processing of local emails?

On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 10:30:25AM -0500, Peter M. Abraham wrote: > Is there a way to tell Spam Assassin (SpamAssassin 3.1.7) to skip processing > emails sent from our network (public IP addresses are involved)? No. SpamAssassin scans anything sent to it. The only way to skip processing is to no

Is there a way to tell spam assassin to avoid any processing of local emails?

Peter M. Abraham Greetings: Is there a way to tell Spam Assassin (SpamAssassin 3.1.7) to skip processing emails sent from our network (public IP addresses are involved)? I do have TrustedNeworks set up, but I don't know if there is another variab

Re: efax spam being marked as -212 ???

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > Additionally, this channel's bundle includes a pre file that loads a > bunch of plugins, some of which that there's a good chance you don't > really care to have running, like HashCash (and for many Pyzor)... all > these ar

Re: blacklist-uri.cf

On 8-Dec-2006, at 19:25, Matt Kettler wrote: The 25_uribl.cf that comes with, and is automatically installed with, SpamAssassin 3.0.0 and higher has all the SURBL lists in it. Ah, there we go. It's been so long since I actually DID anything with SA's config I completely forgot about /usr/loc

Re: bayes db site wide or per user

Theo Van Dinter schrieb: On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 09:44:04PM +0100, Alex Handle wrote: postfix/mysql/nfs/amavisd-new/spamassassin and now we Is it a bad idea to use a site wide bayes database or is it better to use a per user database in this scenario? Per user DBs will give you better results

RE: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently

Sujit Choudhury wrote: > > I am having problem understanding how spamd works after sa-update was > introduced after I upgarded to the latest version of SpamAssassin. > sa-update puts the files into /var/lib directory. However, spamassassin > -D --lint shows the files are read from /var/lib dire

RE: Spamd and Spamassassin filtering differently

I am having problem understanding how spamd works after sa-update was introduced after I upgarded to the latest version of SpamAssassin. sa-update puts the files into /var/lib directory. However, spamassassin -D --lint shows the files are read from /var/lib directory where as spamd program in a

Re: efax spam being marked as -212 ???

David Morton wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've been getting an occasional efax spam that registers -212... I'm using SA 3.1.7 and SARE rules from openprotect: - -15.000 USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST From: address is in the default white-list - -100.000 USER_IN_W

Re: efax spam being marked as -212 ???

- -1.204 AWL From: address is in the auto white-list - -15.000 USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST From: address is in the default white- list - -100.000 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list - -100.000 USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's SPF whitelist Says here you h