On Saturday 02 December 2006 2:09 pm, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Did a botnet fall over or am I just lucky?
>
> spam has dropped dramatically here ~80% down. Not that I'm complaining
> - just curious is anyone else is seeing the same.
>
> KR
>
> Nigel
Quite a bit lower, IIRC, for the last
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Changes in 0.5:
s/relgular/regular/g
in Botnet.txt
Heh. Thank you.
* John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Changes in 0.5:
s/relgular/regular/g
in Botnet.txt
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-BerlinFax. +49 (0)
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 16:20:53 -0500, "Michael Scheidell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Craig Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 3:08 PM
>> To: Michael Scheidell
>> Cc: Nigel Frankcom; SpamAssassin
>> Subject: Re: Best Choice
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hey all,
Did a botnet fall over or am I just lucky?
spam has dropped dramatically here ~80% down. Not that I'm complaining
- just curious is anyone else is seeing the same.
Huh... I too have noticed a significant drop since yesterday's
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 3:08 PM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: Nigel Frankcom; SpamAssassin
> Subject: Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin
>
>
> What you seem to have missed in the conversat
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Just a thought, but when I place rules in /etc/procmailrc, I do something
> like:
>
> :0:
> *^List-ID:
> /var/spool/mail/$USER
>
> That way, if someone else on the server joins the affected list, it is put
> in
> the correct inbox.
Those work, but:
a) you should look at the Botnet plugin. I just posted an announcement
about it this morning. I renamed "RelayChecker" to Botnet a few weeks
ago. I've done at least one code update since then.
b) if you stick with the one you've got, remove the line that has
"128\.114\.1
Hey all,
Did a botnet fall over or am I just lucky?
spam has dropped dramatically here ~80% down. Not that I'm complaining
- just curious is anyone else is seeing the same.
KR
Nigel
Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 2:24 PM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin
My MTA has a list of SA servers it will use in series; if 1
is unavailable
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:27:57 -0500, "Michael Scheidell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 2:24 PM
>> To: SpamAssassin
>> Subject: Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin
>>
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 2:24 PM
> To: SpamAssassin
> Subject: Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin
>
> My MTA has a list of SA servers it will use in series; if 1
> is unavailable it will got
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:31:47 +0100, Noc Phibee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks to your answer
>
>Yes 6 server in load balancing with for all 70 concurrency incoming
>only for spam detect and 3 server for virus scan
>
>
>
>
>
>Michael Scheidell a écrit :
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From:
> -Original Message-
> From: Noc Phibee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 12:32 PM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org; Wazir Shpoon
> Subject: Re: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin
>
>
> Thanks to your answer
>
> Yes 6
Hi,
this is my RelayChecker config:
# load the plugin
loadplugin RelayCheckerRelayChecker.pm
# configuration settings
relaychecker_pass_auth 0
relaychecker_reduced_dns0
relaychecker_skip_ip^127\.0\.0\.1$
relaychecker_skip_ip
Thanks to your answer
Yes 6 server in load balancing with for all 70 concurrency incoming
only for spam detect and 3 server for virus scan
Michael Scheidell a écrit :
-Original Message-
From: Noc Phibee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 8:35 AM
To: users@
Please note I'm not using that way, nor I'm using spamd.
That said.
From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I've seen an installation where postfix handed off mail directly to
> spamd, treating it as a policy server in smtpd_recipient_restrictions.
> I was thinking about doing this for a serv
I have seen this in the past but now can not find those email on how to
do this. What i want to do is rewrite the subject line so when it is
thought to be spam, it will appear like this:
[SPAM]
=the score of the email thought to be spam.
Can some please let me know how to do this.
Chris
begin:vcar
>3) The Mail::SpamAssassin Perl API -- This allows the SpamAssassin code to
> be called directly by another Perl program. This is how Amavisd runs.
> It gets a message, calls the SpamAssassin routines, marks up the message,
> and sends it along. It still only loads everything once, but it i
I've seen an installation where postfix handed off mail directly to
spamd, treating it as a policy server in smtpd_recipient_restrictions.
I was thinking about doing this for a server with several thousand users
and heavy usage. In that configuration, how would spamd behave under
load? Is i
> -Original Message-
> From: Noc Phibee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 8:35 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Best Choice for Bayes filtering on SpamAssassin
>
>
> Hi
>
> i have 6 servers running on spamassassin 3.1.7 (now after a
> upgrad
Changes in 0.5:
1) in case there's a problem with SA reading the MTA's rdns value for
the relay's hostname, Botnet will do a gethostbyaddr call _once_ per
message. This may incur a slight performance hit. You can mitigate
this by having a caching DNS server on whatever hosts are doing your
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
From: Dennis Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Question 2: someone asked why my module is "Botnet" instead of
"Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Botnet". The answer is: when I
first started this (and this is/was my first SA Plugin authoring
attempt), I tried that and it
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David B Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>FYI, easyjet.com appears to have a valid SPF record, so
>
> whitelist_from_spf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>should also work with out the hastle of trying to stay ahead
>of mailserver changes.
Unfortunately it looks like savvis.net
Jack Gostl wrote:
> I've been looking at the spams that slip through, and I notice that
> they have no Bayes score. Not a low score, but no score. I suspect
> that is tied to this message in my log:
>
> Dec 2 02:00:44 web01 spamd[21664]: bayes: cannot open bayes
> databases /home/gostl/.spam
Hi
i have 6 servers running on spamassassin 3.1.7 (now after a upgrades).
Actually, all have Bayes Filering with local Db (default db, not sql)
I want know what is the best choice ? :
- Default Db or MySQL db ?
- 1 Bayes Db per server or 1 Bayes on Sql for all server (same
database)
Hihi ;=)
i have deleted all spamassassin files, delete key into gpg and restart
the installation and now that's work !
Thanks bye
Sietse van Zanen a écrit :
I do not speak French, though I learned some in high school.
Signature faite le mer 22 nov 2006 00:58:01
Now, I'm only familiar with
Hi,
Really what are the tools you're using and/or suggesting to generate such
reports?
Regards,
Leon
-Original Message-
From: Quinn Comendant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 2:41 AM
To: SpamAssassin Users
Subject: Re: Percentage of email that is spam after
I do not speak French, though I learned some in high school.
Signature faite le mer 22 nov 2006 00:58:01
Now, I'm only familiar with faite l'amour, but doesn't that mean the
certificate is expired? If so, the channel maintainer should renew it.
-Sietse
-Original Message-
From: Noc Phib
Plain and simple, put you bayes in a MySQL database.
-Sietse
From: Jack Gostl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 09:17
To: Spamass
Subject: bayes error
I've been looking at the spams that slip through, and I notice that they
have no Bayes score. Not a low score
Hi
i have a lot of server with spamassassin 3.1.7 what sa-update work
perfectly.
But on one server, i have this error:
[7053] dbg: gpg: populating temp signature file
[7053] dbg: gpg: calling gpg
[7053] dbg: gpg: gpg: Signature faite le mer 22 nov 2006 00:58:01 CET
avec la clé RSA ID 24F434C
I've been looking at the spams that slip through, and I notice that they have
no Bayes score. Not a low score, but no score. I suspect that is tied to this
message in my log:
Dec 2 02:00:44 web01 spamd[21664]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/home/gostl/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock
32 matches
Mail list logo
