OK, when Theo, Daryl, Dallas, or one of the other experts appears I
defer to them for this one.
Does it work from a normal user account when you run "spamassassin --lint"?
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Dan McCullough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version if 0.59 which is the latest.
I ca
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan McCullough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: zaterdag 4 november 2006 21:45
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: spamassassin --lint fails - undefined symbol
>
>
> su amavis -c 'spamassassin --lint'
> /usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error:
> /usr/l
Version if 0.59 which is the latest.
I cant train it yet as there is no incoming mail. :(
On 11/4/06, jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Version of NET:DNS? Is it latest? Some versions had problems.
Also get your Bayes trained.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Dan McCullough" <[EMAIL PRO
Just in case I installed from source the Net::DNS module, and it still
does the same thing. But it was a long shot since this whole server
was setup this morning from yum installs. I also change the name
servers in resolve.conf and I got the same result. Arg this is so
annoying, this is like th
As far as I know DNS module is installed.
Here is the complete output.
su amavis -c 'spamassassin --lint -D'
[3901] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
[3901] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG
[3901] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version
From: "Dan McCullough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
su amavis -c 'spamassassin --lint'
/usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Net/DNS/DNS.so:
undefined symbol: Perl_sv_2uv_flags
can someone tell me what I am doing wrong?
Does it work as a simp
From: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Based on Tony's logic, we should delist hotmail.com (someone
might want an email from hotmail), microsoft.com, yahoo.com, google.com,
. All of which are listed in RFCI. Heck, we should totally ignore
the spa
su amavis -c 'spamassassin --lint'
/usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Net/DNS/DNS.so:
undefined symbol: Perl_sv_2uv_flags
can someone tell me what I am doing wrong?
For the "wrote:" spams that come through here, I think all of them are
being caught by my RelayChecker plugin (which I've posted in other threads).
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 9:59 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Amazon / RFCI false positives
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: zat
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: zaterdag 4 november 2006 13:52
> To: Ralf Hildebrandt; Tony Finch
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Amazon / RFCI false positives
> Based on Tony's logic, we should delist hotmail.com (some
Yes- I would rather have correct results than just results.
Okay, so the problem is with my MTA moving the Return-Path header
below the Received headers. It's breaking spamassassin's ability to
check perfectly compliant SPF records. I'm using stock versions of
sendmail 8.13 on all my boxe
> Federico Giannici wrote:
> > François Rousseau wrote:
> >> Greylisting is not always good...
> >>
> >> The greylisting insert delay in delevery and sometimes the email have
> >> to be delever fast.
> >
> > I don't trust enough DNSBLs to completely block an email only based on
> > them.
> >
>
* Michael Scheidell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Based on the original bounce in the rfci list, they have been broken for
> over 5 days.
Yes.
> For a whole, the mx records for amazon.com themselves were broke also.
I didn't notice that.
> What about SARES image scores? Hey, I wanted that email from
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralf Hildebrandt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 2:19 AM
> To: Tony Finch
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Amazon / RFCI false positives
>
>
> * Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > My mistake: I cited the wr
* Michael Scheidell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > True from the RFCI point of view, but NOT true from the
> > SpamAssassin point of view. These messages are wanted by
> > their recipients so should not be scored as spam by SpamAssassin.
>
> You don't understand.
> Go buy a clue somewhere.
These iss
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Finch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Tony Finch
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 8:35 PM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Amazon / RFCI false positives
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Michael Scheidell wrot
17 matches
Mail list logo
