Itś possible on perl version 5.8.1 install the Net::DNS?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dobrý den,
24. ríjna 2006, 8:05:06, napsal jste:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to me off list:
>> So, how whitelist the e-mail from users in my domain?
> I'd be asking myself why there's a need to whitelist my own users.
> Afterall, if you have to whitelist them to avoid their messages being
> mark
Hello All,
I'm running Cyrus as my IMAP server
(Cyrus+Postfix+Amavis_ClamAV+Spamassassin+Web-Cyradm).
I've wrote a script for reporting spam to Razor DB and teaching with it
Bayesian DB, revoking false positives from Razor DB and teaching Bayesian DB
with false positives.
It looks like this (
I have a simple question... someone know a good pyzor server?Right now "pyzor discover" give me "66.250.40.33:24441"and a "pyzor ping" give me "
66.250.40.33:24441 TimeoutError:"So I suppose this server is just dead...ThanksFrancois Rousseau
Stuart Johnston wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
Stuart Johnston wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
2) This sort of replaces the other set of rules I created, that did
this with metarules instead of a plugin. This made some of the
checks less useful. You probably don't need to use both methods.
So, what i
Chris Edwards wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Praise...
>
> I have not used spamassassin for several years. I switched companies
> recently and they were getting killed with spam. I have really
> enjoyed relearning spamassassin and reading the mailing list.
> Spamassassin has done and incredible job of
san wrote:
> Hello..
>
> I have received lots of spam mails like the one i have attached...
>
>
> So I would like to make a rule to detect this kind of spam
> I have gone through SARE and i did't get any rule to aviod this and iam ver
> new to spam assassin
>
> Anyone who can make this rule?
> Any
Matthias Haegele wrote:
> Patrick schrieb:
>> I'm a little confused on rule updates. If you are using SA version
>> 3.04 and run sa-update and/or rulesdujour, will the rules be updated
>> only to the 3.0 branch or will they be updated to the most current
>> branch and just fail if there are depend
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:48:16AM -0800, John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, sa-russian wrote:
>
> > Hi to all!
> >
> > I made a simple script that scans sendmail log files, finds IP
> > from which several spam messages were received, and blocks them in
> > sendmail access file.
>
> I
Chris Purves wrote:
Running "grep noautolearn /usr/share/spamassassin/*" returns the list of
tests with noautolearn set.
...
No Bayes in this list. If your bayes database is well trained, then I
don't see why it shouldn't be used to determine and train more spam or ham.
It doesn't need to be
Kyle Quillen wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a bit of a problem. I am trying to come up with a solution
> that I think will help a lot of people who use the qmail toaster mail
> server. I have my toaster setup to drop mail tagged as spam into spam
> directories in each users mailbox. I am plannin
On 31-Oct-06, at 12:01 PM, Chris Szilagyi wrote:
I have SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (using spamc/spamd) installed on a Red
Hat 7.1
system, with Perl 5.6.1. We currently have SQL user prefs enabled
in a MySQL
db, and put the entries in /etc/procmailrc to enable system-wide
scanning.
My question is
If I go to the RulesDuJour site
(http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour), I get:
Object not found!
The requested URL was not found on this server. The link on the
referring page seems to be wrong or outdated. Please inform the author
of that page about the error.
If you think
John Rudd wrote:
Stuart Johnston wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
2) This sort of replaces the other set of rules I created, that did
this with metarules instead of a plugin. This made some of the
checks less useful. You probably don't need to use both methods.
So, what is the point of doing thi
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Kyle Quillen wrote:
> I have my toaster setup to drop mail tagged as spam into spam
> directories in each users mailbox. I am planning on putting a Ham box
> in their web mail as well. I would like to come up with a script for
> the toaster community that will tell spamassas
Stuart Johnston wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
2) This sort of replaces the other set of rules I created, that did
this with metarules instead of a plugin. This made some of the checks
less useful. You probably don't need to use both methods.
So, what is the point of doing this as a plugin inst
Hello all,
I have a bit of a problem. I am trying to come up with a solution that
I think will help a lot of people who use the qmail toaster mail server.
I have my toaster setup to drop mail tagged as spam into spam
directories in each users mailbox. I am planning on putting a Ham box
in their
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> > Where can I find out more about this plugin? I searched the wiki for
> > "registrar" and it doesn't turn up.
>
> http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/SURBL_registrar/
>
> It was on an Hardin's message (id
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) sent
> yesterday to t
On Tue, October 31, 2006 20:01, Chris Szilagyi wrote:
> the front-end for the user settings, and one of the settings is to set the
> level to "'99' => _("Don't Filter")". But I'm just trying to figure out if
> this will force SpamAssassin (spamd) to just pass the message through without
> examin
I want to filter my spam mail by amavis/spamassassion
(SuSE V10) for a linux box (evolution) and also for a
second W2K box with outlook.
Everything is working fine, but I cannot put spam-mails
in an imap folder to transfer those mails back to the
mail-server to learn via sa-learn --spam.
On my o
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Jim Maul wrote:
> > My question is: Are there any settings for SpamAssassin that users would
> > set
> > in their prefs, that would bypass scanning of their email? My reason for
> > asking is that if we have users that do not want any scanning, we'd like to
> > free up the
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:28 AM +0100 Giampaolo Tomassoni
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's "spam-friendly registar"
> > plugin?
>
> Where can I find out more about this plugin? I searched the wi
> --On Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:28 AM +0100 Giampaolo Tomassoni
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's "spam-friendly registar"
> > plugin?
>
> Where can I find out more about this plugin? I searched the wiki for
> "registrar" and it doesn't turn up
Chris Szilagyi wrote:
Hello:
I have not been able to find the answer to my question so I thought I'd try
this mailing list.
I have SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (using spamc/spamd) installed on a Red Hat 7.1
system, with Perl 5.6.1. We currently have SQL user prefs enabled in a MySQL
db, and put the entr
--On Monday, October 30, 2006 9:56 PM -0800 Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Generally speaking whois queries is a poor way to determine
domain age, at least for client applications. The whois
infrastructure is simply not designed to support the volume of
queries required, even if locally
> Evan Platt wrote:
>> At 09:36 AM 10/31/2006, you wrote:
>>
>>> Here's something similar:
>>>
>>> http://fut.patch.com/
>>
>> I'd be interested in something for postfix / ipfw... :)
>
>
> "Currently analyzes log files based on behavior of OpenSSH v4.2, Postfix
> v2.2.4, and ProFTPD v1.2 as
> packa
Hello:
I have not been able to find the answer to my question so I thought I'd try
this mailing list.
I have SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (using spamc/spamd) installed on a Red Hat 7.1
system, with Perl 5.6.1. We currently have SQL user prefs enabled in a MySQL
db, and put the entries in /etc/procmailrc t
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Will Nordmeyer wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, sa-russian wrote:
> >
> > > Hi to all!
> > >
> > > I made a simple script that scans sendmail log files, finds IP
> > > from which several spam messages were received, and blocks them in
> > > sendmail access file.
> >
> > I ju
--On Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:28 AM +0100 Giampaolo Tomassoni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's "spam-friendly registar"
plugin?
Where can I find out more about this plugin? I searched the wiki for
"registrar" and it doesn't turn up.
Hello..
I have received lots of spam mails like the one i have attached...
So I would like to make a rule to detect this kind of spam
I have gone through SARE and i did't get any rule to aviod this and iam ver
new to spam assassin
Anyone who can make this rule?
Any kind of help is much apprec
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:16:46PM +0100, Yves Goergen wrote:
> > Can you open a bugzilla ticket about this and attach (not cut/paste) the
> > message causing the issue to the ticket? Line 446 is:
>
> Does someone already have an account for that?
You should create yourself an account and then y
> I think based on all of the feedback I'm getting on this, I'm going to
> have a config option for something like
> "relaychecker_skip_statichostname=1" with 1 being the default. It will
> cause both the "IP in hostname" and "dynamic hostname" checks to be
> skipped if "\bstatic\b" is in the
Evan Platt wrote:
At 09:36 AM 10/31/2006, you wrote:
Here's something similar:
http://fut.patch.com/
I'd be interested in something for postfix / ipfw... :)
"Currently analyzes log files based on behavior of OpenSSH v4.2, Postfix v2.2.4, and ProFTPD v1.2 as
packaged for Debian systems."
On 31.10.2006 17:42 CE(S)T, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:56:35AM +0100, Yves Goergen wrote:
>> I've installed SpamAssassin 3.1.6 on Debian Linux 3.1. Is there a way to
>> get rid of this error message?
>>
>> The whole message follows:
>>
>> Oct 31 10:53:06 mond spamd[19424]:
Hello!
Praise...
I have not used
spamassassin for several years. I switched companies recently and they
were getting killed with spam. I have really enjoyed relearning
spamassassin and reading the mailing list. Spamassassin has done and
incredible job of reducing the amount of spam co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:29:37 +0300 (MSK), sa-russian wrote:
>Hi to all!
>
>I made a simple script that scans sendmail log files, finds IP from which
several spam messages were received, and blocks them in sendmail access file.
>
>The backgroung is as
sa-russian wrote:
Hi to all!
I made a simple script that scans sendmail log files, finds IP from which
several spam messages were received, and blocks them in sendmail access file.
The backgroung is as follows: Once I found that our MX is nearly down. Running
top exposed a lot of spamd instan
Adam Katz wrote:
Is there a way to set the bayes auto-learn thresholds to ignore the score
modifications from bayes and whitelists? It seems silly to teach SA that
a spam whose only flag was BAYES_20 is ham, or that spam from a
whitelisted friend's virus-infected computer is ham.
(Maybe this is
Pablo Allietti wrote:
Hi all i want to increase the score of a images rules how can i do that
? for example
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28
HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02
i want to modify the score about this rules for example 4.0 which file i
need to modify? how?
You read the documentation like a good little S
At 09:36 AM 10/31/2006, you wrote:
Here's something similar:
http://fut.patch.com/
I'd be interested in something for postfix / ipfw... :)
I'm intrested how do I get it?
Cheers,
Raul
-
Sent from my Treo 650 Smartphone
-Original Message-
From: "John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: Simple script that rejects mail from spammers
Date: Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:48 am
Size: 924 bytes
To: "sa
I edited the script to be able to run it from command line, it parses every
file under $dirname variable
and save the results (tripped emails) under $path.
I am not a Perl Coder (But a Java One ;) ) so comments are welcome. I made
it available here:
#!/usr/bin/perl
#
my $path = "Spam/";
use M
sa-russian wrote:
Hi to all!
I made a simple script that scans sendmail log files, finds IP from which
several spam messages were received, and blocks them in sendmail access file.
The backgroung is as follows: Once I found that our MX is nearly down. Running
top exposed a lot of spamd instan
Hi all i want to increase the score of a images rules how can i do that
? for example
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28
HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02
i want to modify the score about this rules for example 4.0 which file i
need to modify? how?
John Rudd wrote:
2) This sort of replaces the other set of rules I created, that did this
with metarules instead of a plugin. This made some of the checks less
useful. You probably don't need to use both methods.
So, what is the point of doing this as a plugin instead of using existing ru
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 03:23:21PM -0800, John Rudd wrote:
> I've written a plugin for Spam Assassin that does the relay checks I
...and here was me just working out how to get exim to check this,
and have SpamAssassin add a score, and your mail arrived :-)
> 1) no RDNS for the machines tha
Jeff Chan wrote:
Generally speaking whois queries is a poor way to determine
domain age, at least for client applications. The whois
infrastructure is simply not designed to support the volume of
queries required, even if locally cached.
Perhaps CRISP is part of the answer to this problem.
Hi to all!
I made a simple script that scans sendmail log files, finds IP from which
several spam messages were received, and blocks them in sendmail access file.
The backgroung is as follows: Once I found that our MX is nearly down. Running
top exposed a lot of spamd instances, cosuming almost
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 11:19 +0100, Fabio wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a small site with some users and a sendmail mailing lists that contain
> all users. This mailing list is used almost exclusively by internal users,
> sending mail to all other users.
> Unfortunately, I receive a lot of spam (about 60%
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, sa-russian wrote:
>
> > Hi to all!
> >
> > I made a simple script that scans sendmail log files, finds IP
> > from which several spam messages were received, and blocks them in
> > sendmail access file.
>
> I just set up something similar to block at the firewall (Linux
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:56:35AM +0100, Yves Goergen wrote:
> I've installed SpamAssassin 3.1.6 on Debian Linux 3.1. Is there a way to
> get rid of this error message?
>
> The whole message follows:
>
> Oct 31 10:53:06 mond spamd[19424]: Day '31' out of range 1..30 at
> /usr/local/share/perl/5.
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Monday, October 30, 2006, 11:28:39 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> > Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's "spam-friendly
> > registar" plugin?
>
> > I mean, a brand-new domain from a SFR (Spam-friendly registar)
> > is really bad (scores 5?).
Patrick schrieb:
I'm a little confused on rule updates. If you are using SA version 3.04
and run sa-update and/or rulesdujour, will the rules be updated only to
the 3.0 branch or will they be updated to the most current branch and
just fail if there are dependency issues?
rulesdujour: You sh
I'm a little confused on rule updates. If you are using SA version 3.04 and
run sa-update and/or rulesdujour, will the rules be updated only to the 3.0
branch or will they be updated to the most current branch and just fail if
there are dependency issues?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CocoNet Corporation
Pablo Allietti wrote:
> Hi all i want to increase the score of a images rules how can i do
> that ? for example
>
> HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28
> HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02
>
> i want to modify the score about this rules for example 4.0 which
> file i need to modify? how?
Just drop the new score rules into your
Steven Dickenson wrote:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 6:09 AM, John Rudd wrote:
I've considered the exact opposite (adding static to the check for
keywords). My rules are really looking more for "is this a _client_
host", not "is this a dynamic host". That one check looks for
"dynamic", but I'm not i
I assume that I scan all mail automatically (obviously there might be
some setup errors). Still I don't know why some redirected e-mails get
through when others not, even if both are scored as spam on my local server.
Thank's
Wojtek
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Monday 30 October 2006 21:41, Wojcie
Is there a way to set the bayes auto-learn thresholds to ignore the score
modifications from bayes and whitelists? It seems silly to teach SA that
a spam whose only flag was BAYES_20 is ham, or that spam from a
whitelisted friend's virus-infected computer is ham.
(Maybe this is done already? I d
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, sa-russian wrote:
> Hi to all!
>
> I made a simple script that scans sendmail log files, finds IP
> from which several spam messages were received, and blocks them in
> sendmail access file.
I just set up something similar to block at the firewall (Linux
iptables, sendmail l
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:17:56AM -0500, Patrick wrote:
> I'm a little confused on rule updates. If you are using SA version 3.04
> and run sa-update and/or rulesdujour, will the rules be updated only to the
> 3.0 branch or will they be updated to the most current branch and just fail
> if the
Louis Li wrote:
> Hello, I'm novice in Linux and I wish to add SpamAssassin to my current
> Fedora 3 server, I'm currently using my ISP mail accounts and I have
> tested with SAproxy in Windows and it works fine.
>
> However when I installed the bundled SpamAssassin (3.0.4), I couldn't
> find any
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:19:40 +0100, "Fabio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >I have a small site with some users and a sendmail mailing lists that
> >contain all users. This mailing list is used almost exclusively by internal
> >users, sending mail to all other users.
> >Unfortunately,
On Oct 31, 2006, at 6:09 AM, John Rudd wrote:
I've considered the exact opposite (adding static to the check for
keywords). My rules are really looking more for "is this a
_client_ host", not "is this a dynamic host". That one check looks
for "dynamic", but I'm not interested in exempting
John Rudd wrote:
> I've considered the exact opposite (adding static to the check for
> keywords). [...] They've still got a hostname that looks like an
> end-client, and an end-client shouldn't be connecting to other
> people's mail servers. Any end-client that connects to someone
> else's email
John Rudd wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
Hi,
Right off the bat I've disabled it. It, of course, hits on all mail
my local users send. That's not really acceptable in an ISP situation
so I've turned it off until tomorrow when I have the time to look at
the code and see i
> Massimiliano Hofer wrote:
> > We have
> > rather successfull anti-spam legislation and, except for
> botnets, really
> > little spam originates here.
> >
>
> Right ... but it's those botnets that this plugin is trying to catch.
I use greylisting for this, and it works great to me. Also, it
On Tue, October 31, 2006 1:26 pm, Massimiliano Hofer wrote:
[snip]
> I know that the problem lays in Telecom Italia's hands, but we don't have
> much
> choice (we have formal competition, but it's really a monopoly).
> I'll just be glad if our whole country won't be mass quarantined. We have
> rath
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
RELAY_CHECKER (at least one rule had been triggered. According to your code
would score 4 by default);
RC_NORDNS (scores 1);
RC_BADRDNS (scores 1);
RC_BADDNS (scores 1);
RC_IPINHOSTNAME (scores 1);
RC_DYNHOSTNAME (scores 1);
Agreed. This way the plugin c
Massimiliano Hofer wrote:
We have
rather successfull anti-spam legislation and, except for botnets, really
little spam originates here.
Right ... but it's those botnets that this plugin is trying to catch.
And, while I may be a little unyielding wrt to people whose ISPs are
like Telecom I
> > I would prefer not to have to deal with a single, computed
> RELAY_CHECKER score, but with many different ones for each of the
> triggered cases. This way it would be easier to tune scores from
> this plugin.
> >
> > To me, your plugin could trigger the following tags:
> >
> > RELAY_CHECKE
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
So, if people could take a look at it, test it, see if it does what it
advertises, and see if it's as accurate as my experience indicates, I
would appreciate getting feedback. If it pans out, I'll see about
putting it in a tar ball, and submitting it to the wiki's li
>
> ...omissis...
>
> I've considered the exact opposite (adding static to the check for
> keywords). My rules are really looking more for "is this a _client_
> host", not "is this a dynamic host". That one check looks for
> "dynamic", but I'm not interested in exempting anyone because they're
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 12:02 pm, John Rudd wrote:
> > Telecom Italia is used to put RDNSes with something like this:
> >
> > host1-84-static.48-88-b.business.telecomitalia.it.
>
> They would not be banned from the e-mail world.
Not every provider in Italy gives us this luxury. Not even every
Alain Wolf wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31.10.2006 09:32, * Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Same here in Switzerland, at least one of the main national ISPs calls
his clients nn-nn-nn-nn.static.cablecom.ch
But we had already rejections and spam-tags from many places even
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
On 31.10.2006 09:32, * Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Same here in Switzerland, at least one of the main national ISPs calls
his clients nn-nn-nn-nn.static.cablecom.ch
But we had already rejections and spam-tags from many places
even before
that plugin came out. But th
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
So, if people could take a look at it, test it, see if it does what it
advertises, and see if it's as accurate as my experience indicates, I
would appreciate getting feedback. If it pans out, I'll see about
putting it in a tar ball, and submitting it to the wiki's li
Hi,
I've been reporting this error message before, and I was told that it
was fixed in a development snapshot. Now, about 3 or 4 versions later, I
see this message again, already about 20 times for today. (But the
number of scanned and rejected e-mails is surely quite a lot greater.)
Yesterday, on
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:19:40 +0100, "Fabio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi,
>I have a small site with some users and a sendmail mailing lists that contain
>all users. This mailing list is used almost exclusively by internal users,
>sending mail to all other users.
>Unfortunately, I receive a lot
Hi,
I have a small site with some users and a sendmail mailing lists that contain
all users. This mailing list is used almost exclusively by internal users,
sending mail to all other users.
Unfortunately, I receive a lot of spam (about 60% of total spam) to this
address, and this is bad because
On Monday 30 October 2006 21:41, Wojciech Potrzebowski took the opportunity to
say:
> I understand that there are different configurations of two servers but
> I am wondering if there is any possibility to catch these mail (not
> treated as spam with remote server) on my local server.
Well, certa
> On 31.10.2006 09:32, * Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> >> Same here in Switzerland, at least one of the main national ISPs calls
> >> his clients nn-nn-nn-nn.static.cablecom.ch
> >>
> >> But we had already rejections and spam-tags from many places
> even before
> >> that plugin came out. But they g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31.10.2006 09:32, * Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
>> Same here in Switzerland, at least one of the main national ISPs calls
>> his clients nn-nn-nn-nn.static.cablecom.ch
>>
>> But we had already rejections and spam-tags from many places even before
>>
> Same here in Switzerland, at least one of the main national ISPs calls
> his clients nn-nn-nn-nn.static.cablecom.ch
>
> But we had already rejections and spam-tags from many places even before
> that plugin came out. But they give you a reverse DNS entry of your own
> hostname if you ask for.
W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31.10.2006 09:13, * Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
>> So, if people could take a look at it, test it, see if it does what it
>> advertises, and see if it's as accurate as my experience indicates, I
>> would appreciate getting feedback. If it pans out
Hello, I'm novice in Linux and I wish to add SpamAssassin to my current
Fedora 3 server, I'm currently using my ISP mail accounts and I have
tested with SAproxy in Windows and it works fine.
However when I installed the bundled SpamAssassin (3.0.4), I couldn't
find any settings to key in my ISP em
> So, if people could take a look at it, test it, see if it does what it
> advertises, and see if it's as accurate as my experience indicates, I
> would appreciate getting feedback. If it pans out, I'll see about
> putting it in a tar ball, and submitting it to the wiki's list of plugins.
86 matches
Mail list logo
