What does MSGID_SPAM_LETTERS
mean?
Can I increase the
core for this? Will it lead to false positives?
Since last two weeks
we are getting lot of spam emails. I found that all these mails has one thing
in common which hits MSGID_SPAM_LETTERS.
Warm Regards,
Suhas
System Administ
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 01:36:51PM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Why are you exempting xmr3 from the uri blacklist?
> egrep 'messagereach|xmr3' *
> 25_uribl.cf:uridnsbl_skip_domain xmr3.com yahoo.ca yahoo.co.kr
> yahoo.co.uk
FWIW, the default listing was generated by the SURBL folks from thei
I am running spamassassin with qmail. It catchs up most of mail that is
scored as spam. However, some e-mails that are redirected form the other
mail server (also with spam checking system) get through even it is
treates spam if I run local test. Any idea how to fix the problem?
Wojtek
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 06:15:12PM -0700, Alan Fullmer wrote:
> I have a question. I'm not sure If it's a setting in Postfix or if
> something needs to be set with my wrapper script.
>
> Currently I have Postfix doing virtual lookups by mysql tables. From that
> point, I have this:
> Master.cf
>
Perhaps found the solution.
Poking my nose around in various documentation... I messed with a few things
and got it to work. I also fixed (inadvertently) something else that was on
my wish list.
I made two changes to main.cf:
transport_destination_recipient_limit=1
spamassassin_transport_destin
Thanks. That puts me on the right path.
I did forget to post my script:
#!/bin/bash
/usr/bin/spamc -f -u "$4" | /usr/sbin/sendmail -i "$@"
exit $?
-Original Message-
From: Wietse Venema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 6:30 PM
To: Alan Fullmer
Cc: [EMAIL PROTEC
Alan Fullmer:
> I have a question. I'm not sure If it's a setting in Postfix or if
> something needs to be set with my wrapper script.
>
> Currently I have Postfix doing virtual lookups by mysql tables. From that
> point, I have this:
> Master.cf
> --
> smtp inet n
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alain Wolf
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 8:39 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: spamassassin --lint fails with rules in local.cf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.10.2006 14:35, * Dylan
I have a question. I'm not sure If it's a setting in Postfix or if
something needs to be set with my wrapper script.
Currently I have Postfix doing virtual lookups by mysql tables. From that
point, I have this:
Master.cf
--
smtp inet n - - -
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 01:41 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Sun, October 29, 2006 16:33, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
>
> > rules_du_jour restarts amavisd-new after it runs, but sa-update
> > doesn't. Do most people run it out of cron and simply append an
> > (without the quotes, of course) " && /et
On Sun, October 29, 2006 16:33, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> rules_du_jour restarts amavisd-new after it runs, but sa-update
> doesn't. Do most people run it out of cron and simply append an
> (without the quotes, of course) " && /etc/init.d/amavis reload" to the
> command line? Or is there another
On 29-okt-2006, at 17:55, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
On 10/29/06, Leander Koornneef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my experience, using the default sa-update channel, the
openprotect
channel, auto-whitelisting, proper bayes training(!), pyzor, razor,
dcc, SPF
and DNS blacklists wil ge
Why are you exempting xmr3 from the uri blacklist?
egrep 'messagereach|xmr3' *
25_uribl.cf:uridnsbl_skip_domain xmr3.com yahoo.ca yahoo.co.kr
yahoo.co.uk
If they allow their clients to send spam, I would want the blacklists to
check against them:
You will receive one additional e-mail message co
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 08:49:12AM -0800, Evan Platt wrote:
> Oct 29 08:47:06 espphotography spamd[12945]: (?:(?<=[\s,]))* matches
> null string many times in regex; marked by <-- HERE in
[...]
> Any hints or ideas?
This has come up enough on the list that I made a FAQ entry on the wiki for
it:
On 10/29/06, Leander Koornneef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my experience, using the default sa-update channel, the openprotect
channel, auto-whitelisting, proper bayes training(!), pyzor, razor,
dcc, SPF
and DNS blacklists wil get you a spam detection rate >99%.
I'm doing all that, now, I th
Seeing the below error quite frequently...
Oct 29 08:47:06 espphotography spamd[12945]: (?:(?<=[\s,]))* matches
null string many times in regex; marked by <-- HERE in
m/\G(?:(?<=[\s,]))* <-- HERE \Z/ at
/opt/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7/Text/Wrap.pm line 46.\n
Line 46 of Wrap.pm is
while ($t !~
On 29-okt-2006, at 16:33, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
On 10/29/06, Leander Koornneef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you are using spamassassin 3.1, you can use sa-update to get
the SARE
rulesets from the channel provided by http://
saupdates.openprotect.com/.
This negates the necessity to run
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 11:33:54 -0400, "Shaun T. Erickson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 10/29/06, Leander Koornneef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> If you are using spamassassin 3.1, you can use sa-update to get the SARE
>> rulesets from the channel provided by http://saupdates.openprotect.com/.
>
On 10/29/06, Leander Koornneef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you are using spamassassin 3.1, you can use sa-update to get the SARE
rulesets from the channel provided by http://saupdates.openprotect.com/.
This negates the necessity to run rulesdujour alongside sa-update. This
channel consists onl
On 29-okt-2006, at 7:38, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
I've just downloaded this and set it up. I see there are MANY rulesets
I can choose from, but I have no idea if they are all 'safe' (not even
sure what I mean by that). Is there a subset of all these rulesets,
that "everybody" uses, or does ever
Many of them are SARE rulesets. Look at www.rulesemporium.com/rules to see
the descriptions of the various rulesets. No, not all of them are "safe".
Many of them are deliberately graded by your willingness to live with
possible FPs. In general they range from xxx0.cf for "dead safe" to xxx4 o
21 matches
Mail list logo
