I've just downloaded this and set it up. I see there are MANY rulesets
I can choose from, but I have no idea if they are all 'safe' (not even
sure what I mean by that). Is there a subset of all these rulesets,
that "everybody" uses, or does everyone use all of them? How do you
decide which to use
Rick Macdougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sammy Anderson wrote:> And there is one of these for each user, this is just for one user. Sounds like we may have to abandon Bayes or possibly use mysql. Not sure we are ready to invest in setting that all up...> Bayes in MySQL is a snap to setup and
On 10/28/06, Shaun T. Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The current problem is that Pyzor times out trying to contact it's
remote server:
Because this server (66.250.40.33:24441) - which I got from multiple
tries at running 'pyzor discover' - isn't responding. This one
(82.94.255.100:24441)
On 10/28/06, Clifton Royston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you run the "discover" mode on Razor yet? You need to manually
run that (as the user and with the home directory Razor will be running
as, in your case amavis) for it to latch onto some servers to use.
Yes, and Razor2 is working fi
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 05:42:09PM -0400, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> On 10/28/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >If you want to see Razor debug output, run a
> >message through in the way I mentioned before, ala:
> >
> >spamassassin -D razor2 < message_file > /dev/null
> >
> >wil
On 10/28/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you want to see Razor debug output, run a
message through in the way I mentioned before, ala:
spamassassin -D razor2 < message_file > /dev/null
will show you only razor2 debug output (most of which will look like output
from "razor-che
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 04:15:56PM -0400, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> loaded in init.pre. When I run the lint command, I see that it says:
> [22571] dbg: razor2: local tests only, skipping Razor
Yeah, that's new in 3.1.6. --lint no longer runs network checks.
> I tried setting "local_tests_only 0
On 10/28/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 03:12:16PM -0400, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> Yes, I've gone to the SA site, and read what I can find on these three
> plugins, but it's still not clear to me how to enable them and see
> that they are actually being u
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 03:12:16PM -0400, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
> Yes, I've gone to the SA site, and read what I can find on these three
> plugins, but it's still not clear to me how to enable them and see
> that they are actually being used.
The short version is to uncomment the loadplugin lin
I am setting up a new server to replace an old one. The old server ran
a version of spamassassin prior to it's use of plugins.
I've got my new server up and running (CentOS 4.4) nicely, with
amavisd-new (v2.4.3) calling spamassassin (v3.1.7), and SA's default
settings are tagging most spam as suc
On Saturday 28 October 2006 19:46, David Baron wrote:
> Regular expression body rules that I made in webmin-spamassassin were duely
> devoured after I edited one of the scores. All the scorings are there but
> none of the rules. Any way to get the back or must I start from scratch (or
> simply trus
Hi,
I'm running 3.1.5 on FreeBSD from ports. I have a unique
situation and I wondered if I was doing something to confuse SA.
My server has a series of users :
server:*:1004:1004:TBOH Listproc:/usr/local/etc/server:/usr/local/bin/zsh
stcomp:*:1004:1004:TBOH
Listproc:/usr/local/e
Regular expression body rules that I made in webmin-spamassassin were duely
devoured after I edited one of the scores. All the scorings are there but
none of the rules. Any way to get the back or must I start from scratch (or
simply trust in Bayes)?
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 11:41:48AM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
> I'm not sure what you are talking about Theo. Sorry.
I was talking about SMTP.
> Below is an envelope example from a Spam email, at least an envelope
> from my mail system.
> ---
> D1161764311
> [EMAIL PROTECT
> Thanks Giampaolo! Does this mean that "whatever character you like"
> cannot show up anywhere else in the string (except the very end)?
Right. 'q' is meant exactly to use, in example, " and ' characters in strings
with no escaping mechanism.
There are few exceptions to this trick (i.e.: you
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
You can use any quoting mechanism you like:
...("This is a programmer's ...")
...([EMAIL PROTECTED] is a programmer's ...@)
etc.
Sorry for the Perl question.
Is the "q" in "([EMAIL PROTECTED] is a programmer's ...@)" a typo?
No, it isn't. It means "QUOTE
> > You can use any quoting mechanism you like:
> >
> > ...("This is a programmer's ...")
> > ...([EMAIL PROTECTED] is a programmer's ...@)
> > etc.
>
> Sorry for the Perl question.
> Is the "q" in "([EMAIL PROTECTED] is a programmer's ...@)" a typo?
No, it isn't. It means "QUOTE" and allows you
Even if spamd is process forking and not spawning worker threads, is it
possible with the latest production versions of Perl and SA to make it
muli-threaded all the way through?
When I say "all the way through", I'm wanting to know if, even in a
threaded implementation, would mutex/semaphore/e
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:57:52PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
I'd prefer to use M::SA->check_message_text(), but if I do a
M::SA->check_message_text('This is a programmer's nightmare.'), then
M::SA->check_message_text() will choke because of the (') in the middle
of th
FYI,
*My tests show that this is causing a memory leak.
Joe
my $spamtest = Mail::SpamAssassin->new();
my $status = $spamtest->check($spamtest->parse($message));
if ($status->
I'm not sure what you are talking about Theo. Sorry.
Below is an envelope example from a Spam email, at least an envelope
from my mail system.
I assume the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is useful to SA.
Is there a better form I can put this in before pre-pending to the
message body? Also, currently, the
Hi!
I use SA version 3.1.7.
There are many many spam messages.
I notice that field "dccresult" is empty.
How can I check if dcc works propely?
Thank you
Valeray
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,
UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=3.1.7 date=Sat, 28
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
>
>> >> In awl row: email|62.234|1|1.109 (e-mail|ip|count|score)
>> >> Something strange: count is 1 still and score has become 1.109 :(
>> >
>> > What happened to the email|none row? Is it still there?
>> >
>> Yes it still there:
>> email|62.234|1|1.109 (e-mail|ip
Daryl C. W. O wrote:
>
> Of course it does. It supports per user preferences, so if you pass
> nothing but domain names it thus supports per domain preferences.
>
What about dynamic whitelists (i suppose don't use .cf files)?
Is it possible to add/delete some value to whitelist/black in wor
> >> In awl row: email|62.234|1|1.109 (e-mail|ip|count|score)
> >> Something strange: count is 1 still and score has become 1.109 :(
> >
> > What happened to the email|none row? Is it still there?
> >
> Yes it still there:
> email|62.234|1|1.109 (e-mail|ip|count|score)
You mean you don't have a
> I just received some email from Spamcop, and thought to check the
> spamassassin scores on it:
>
> No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599,
> DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME=0.001,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2,
> FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=1.593,SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no version=3.1.7
>
> I was qu
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Fitzner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 5:57 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Further on DNS_FROM_RFC_*
>
>
> I just received some email from Spamcop, and thought to check
> the spamassassin scores on it:
I just received some email from Spamcop, and thought to check the
spamassassin scores on it:
No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599,
DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME=0.001,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2,
FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=1.593,SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no version=3.1.7
I was quite amused t
28 matches
Mail list logo
