--On September 24, 2006 8:43:54 PM -0400 Julian Underwood is rumoured to
have written:
> Hi Rob, thanks for your response. I'm running 2.3b FuzzyOcr. I changed
> the pre314 option to 1 and I'm still getting the same error when I
> restart spamassassin. Any other thoughts on why this may be the
Bugzillia seems to be broken tonight.
The specs say that if you use spamc with multiple hosts then if the
first host fails it will try the other hosts. It does do this. But if
you user the -x switch then it only tries the first host.
spamc -d host1,host2 - works
spamc -x -d host1,host2
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 11:10 -0600, Rob wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:22:08PM -0400, ma wrote:
> >
> >Hi Folks,
> >I'm running SA 3.1.0. I'm being hit by a bunch of image spam, so I am
> >trying to get FuzzyOcrPlugin working. I'm a bit scared to upgrade my
> >SA install beca
Marc Perkel wrote:
running spamc as follows:
spamc -x -d pascal.ctyme.com,mysql.ctyme.com
Using 2 hosts and according to the docs if the first one fails then it
trys the second one. But in reality if the first one fails it never
tries the second one. Then I added the -H switch and it will a
running spamc as follows:
spamc -x -d pascal.ctyme.com,mysql.ctyme.com
Using 2 hosts and according to the docs if the first one fails then it
trys the second one. But in reality if the first one fails it never
tries the second one. Then I added the -H switch and it will alternate
between the
Loren Wilton wrote:
> The child is trying to run a Bayes expire, apparently on a large Bayes
> database that hasn't had a successful expiry run in some time. This attempt
> to process the Bayes database is probably taking over 300 seconds, and the
> child is being timed out and killed by somet
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Sun, September 24, 2006 04:50, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>>> change score on whitelist_from solves most here
>>>
>> Eh? How does changing the score solve anything?
>>
>
> we talked about usefullness on whitelist_from ?
>
> if changing score can make it better s
Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Tue, September 19, 2006 5:01 pm, mouss said:
why not set your hostname to an fqdn value?
Because then well-behaved tools will be messed up?
You probably mean broken resolver implementations. but these should
either be fixed or abandoned. It's been years
On Sun, September 24, 2006 04:50, Matt Kettler wrote:
>> change score on whitelist_from solves most here
> Eh? How does changing the score solve anything?
we talked about usefullness on whitelist_from ?
if changing score can make it better since its the way spamassassin works on
no one wants to
