So, what's the secret in getting the right values? For example, do you
generally modify the
grey level first and try to see if the words come out. Then when you get
close, make small
variations in the dust size and spacewidth? This is pretty neat.
Ususally -d 1 or 2 is fine. Playing with -
So, what's the secret in getting the right values? For example, do you
generally modify the grey level first and try to see if the words come out.
Then when you get close, make small variations in the dust size and spacewidth?
This is pretty neat.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Jim
Heute (23.09.2006/03:13 Uhr) schrieb Benny Pedersen,
> On Sat, September 23, 2006 02:54, Jim Knuth wrote:
>> Heute (23.09.2006/02:54 Uhr) schrieb Benny Pedersen,
>>> On Sat, September 23, 2006 01:47, Matt Rossiter wrote:
http://rossiters.com/images/Viagra-Photo.jpg (I promise it's safe)
I have a need to isolate any mail that contains a UK phone number. I would
expect there's a plugin that does something already?
Not that I know of. There is the SARE EvilNumbers.cf rule list (which is
rather out of date). But I don't know of a plugin that was ever done for
this sort of thin
Whoah. That worked perfect. Thanks!
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 5:55 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Another FuzzyOcr question
On Sat, September 23, 2006 01:47, Matt Rossiter wrote:
> http:
On Sat, September 23, 2006 02:54, Jim Knuth wrote:
> Heute (23.09.2006/02:54 Uhr) schrieb Benny Pedersen,
>> On Sat, September 23, 2006 01:47, Matt Rossiter wrote:
>>> http://rossiters.com/images/Viagra-Photo.jpg (I promise it's safe)
>>> Any advice?
>> gocr -d 2 -l 90 Viagra-Photo.jpg
>> works he
Heute (23.09.2006/02:54 Uhr) schrieb Benny Pedersen,
> On Sat, September 23, 2006 01:47, Matt Rossiter wrote:
>> http://rossiters.com/images/Viagra-Photo.jpg (I promise it's safe)
>> Any advice?
> gocr -d 2 -l 90 Viagra-Photo.jpg
> works here
not for me :/
gocr -d 2 -l 90 Viagra-Photo.jpg
sh:
I have a need to isolate any mail that contains a UK phone number. I
would expect there's a plugin that does something already?
On Sat, September 23, 2006 01:47, Matt Rossiter wrote:
> http://rossiters.com/images/Viagra-Photo.jpg (I promise it's safe)
> Any advice?
gocr -d 2 -l 90 Viagra-Photo.jpg
works here
--
"This message was sent using 100% recycled spam mails."
Title: RE: FP: URI_NOVOWEL
> > So the test catches legitimate URIs. an immediate
improvement is > > >
> uri URI_NOVOWEL /https?\:\/\/[bcdfghjklmnpqrstvwxz]{7}/i
> > > > because the goal is
to catch URIs with random hostname > parts. Of
course, > > they can still put that in the middle,
ak
My question is pretty simple. Everything is working pretty good so far.
This plugin has been able to successfully read lots of spam images and
filter them out. I've had this image slip through a few times -->
http://rossiters.com/images/Viagra-Photo.jpg (I promise it's safe) but
gocr can only rec
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Russell Jones wrote:
> @daily sa-learn --spam
> /home/eggycrew/imap/eggycrew.com/rjones/Maildir/.INBOX.spam
> @daily sa-learn --ham /home/eggycrew/imap/eggycrew.com/rjones/Maildir/cur
> @daily sa-learn --ham /home/eggycrew/imap/eggycrew.com/rjones/Maildir/new
Put all your le
If I have multiple sa-learn processes
going at the same time, can that corrupt the database and/or cause some other
problem that I don't want to happen? Or is it safe to have the following in
crontab for example:
@daily sa-learn --spam
/home/eggycrew/imap/eggycrew.com/rjones/Maildir/.INBOX
On 2006-09-22, ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running SA 3.1.0. I'm being hit by a bunch of image spam, so I am =
> trying to get FuzzyOcrPlugin working. I'm a bit scared to upgrade my SA =
> install because it is working quite well and I don't want to break it.
>
> My issue is FuzzyOcrPlug
Russell Jones wrote:
> Alrighty, now that I've had some time to look at it, I would like to
> make sure I understand this correctly.
>
> In the man page for it, it says: bayes_path /path/filename
> (default: ~/.spamassassin/bayes)
>
> So, if I change the ~/.spamassassin/bayes to, for example,
I just committed a fix to the one which had lint errors.
#version: 01.00.36
--
-Doc
SA/SARE -- Ninja
3:24pm up 20 days, 18:58, 19 users, load average: 1.02, 0.79, 0.74
SARE HQ http://www.rulesemporium.com/
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Tim Rosmus wrote:
|# I then did a 'sa-learn --dump magic' on the DB server and
|# also on one of the incoming servers. Why the different
|# numbers? (I use bayes_sql_override_username on all)
|#
Disregard, found the problem. A slight spelling error for
the bayes_sql_over
Yes. If you set bayes_path to an absolute path, it will be a
global database.
Bowie
Russell Jones wrote:
> Okay, but other than that it'll begin using a global database for
> every email account it is protecting, correct?
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTE
Title: RE: FP: URI_NOVOWEL
> -Original Message-
> From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 7:41 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: FP: URI_NOVOWEL
>
>
> From: "mouss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Chris Santerre wrote:
> >>
> >>>
Okay, but other than that it'll begin using a global database for every
email account it is protecting, correct?
- Original Message -
From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 2:10 PM
Subject: RE: Global configuration question
Russell Jones wrot
Russell Jones wrote:
> Alrighty, now that I've had some time to look at it, I would like to
> make sure I understand this correctly.
>
> In the man page for it, it says: bayes_path /path/filename
> (default: ~/.spamassassin/bayes)
>
> So, if I change the ~/.spamassassin/bayes to, for example
Alrighty, now that I've had some time to look at it, I would like to make
sure I understand this correctly.
In the man page for it, it says: bayes_path /path/filename (default:
~/.spamassassin/bayes)
So, if I change the ~/.spamassassin/bayes to, for example,
/var/spamassassin/bayes, the
SA-3.1.5
I recently moved from individual incoming machine Bayes DBs
to a central MySql Bayes that all incoming servers connect
to. I noticed that running 'sa-learn --force-expire'
on the DB server worked the first time but has done nothing
in the last few weeks. A "--dump magic" shows the sa
you might also want to check:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#miscellaneous_options
eg lock_method I had the same bayes files errors and set this to
lock_method flock and think i have alleviated the problems.
-john
sokka wrote:
1. Increase
1. Increase your RAM
2. Increase your child spam process.
regards
On 9/21/06, Payal Rathod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,A friend of mine is maintaining a mail server for a school and I amhelpig her out. There are just 150-200 accounts and the machine is
having 512 Mb RAM and 1Gb swap running Ce
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:22:08PM -0400, ma wrote:
>
>Hi Folks,
>I'm running SA 3.1.0. I'm being hit by a bunch of image spam, so I am
>trying to get FuzzyOcrPlugin working. I'm a bit scared to upgrade my
>SA install because it is working quite well and I don't want to break
>
Title: FuzzyOcrPlugin and SA 3.1.0
Hi Folks,
I'm running SA 3.1.0. I'm being hit by a bunch of image spam, so I am trying to get FuzzyOcrPlugin working. I'm a bit scared to upgrade my SA install because it is working quite well and I don't want to break it.
My issue is FuzzyOcrPlugin is
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 05:04:00PM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> I also added a debug line in each funtion of the plugin that report
> the name of the function; as you can see, only set_config function is
> being called. spamcop_report is never called while the sample message
> scores at 15.
Of c
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:01:20AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >> The moral here is NEVER use whitelist_from.
> > ...does this indicate that whitelist_from should be obsoleted?
> should, yes.. will be, probably not.
Well, there is a need and are uses for whitelist_from, specifically when the
oth
From: "Salatiel Filho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 9/21/06, John D. Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Salatiel Filho wrote:
> What would be the main difference between
> whitelist_from_spf and whitelist_from ?
whitelist_from_spf only trusts the sender address if the message
pa
From: "mouss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 6:12 PM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: FP: URI_NOVOWEL
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:58:46PM +0200, mouss wro
rting SpamAssassin.
>>> Rollback command is: mv -f /etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_stocks.cf
>>> /etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/70_sare_stocks.cf.2; mv -f
>>> /etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/70_sare_stocks.cf.20060922-1042
>>> /etc/mail/spamassass
/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/70_sare_stocks.cf.20060922-1042
/etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_stocks.cf;
Lint output: [6533] warn: config: invalid regexp for rule SARE_MLB_Stock6:
/(?:(E\.GL\.y)|(Eg \|_ y)|(e g \|
y)|(egly)|.P.\s+.P.\s+.?\s+.T.\s+.L.|.P.\s+.P.\s+.T.\s+.L.|A B S Y|A D\s+Y E
Hi,
I am running SA and I cannot get the SpamCop plugin to do anything.
SA version is:
SpamAssassin version 3.1.5
running on Perl version 5.8.8
When I run SA with and look for lines containing SpamCop, I get:
$ spamassassin -t -D < FuzzyOcr-2.3b/samples/png.eml 2>&1 |grep -y spamcop
[1324] db
-f
>/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/70_sare_stocks.cf.20060922-1042
>/etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_stocks.cf;
>
>Lint output: [6533] warn: config: invalid regexp for rule SARE_MLB_Stock6:
>/(?:(E\.GL\.y)|(Eg \|_ y)|(e g \|
>y)|(egly)|.P.\s+.P.\s+.?\s+.T.\s+.L.|.P.\s+.P.\s+.T.\s+.L.|
John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>
>> The moral here is NEVER use whitelist_from.
>>
>
> ...does this indicate that whitelist_from should be obsoleted?
should, yes.. will be, probably not.
Salatiel Filho wrote:
> What would be the main difference between
> whitelist_from_spf and whitelist_from ?
whitelist_from - whitelist anything matching the specified From: header.
whitelist_from_rcvd - whitelist anything matching the specified From AND
reverse DNS hostname from a Received: heade
"Legit" in this particular instance is open to interpretation. :-(
The mail isn't from BofA. The mail is from CheckFree Inc.
Which is a legit banking company, but it isn't BofA.
So they are lying in the From address about who they are. In that sense,
the mail is a spoof.
On the other hand, i
> Well , i have added a spf record for mydomain.edu.br and changed my
user_prefs> from whitelist_from *@mydomain.edu.br to whitelist_from_rcvd
*@mydomain.edu.br> but i think it's
not working. I sent a mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> from [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Here
is the mail status:> X-Spam-St
Will reducing it to -m 5 make the mail delivery slow?
If you were thrashing and reducing the number of children gets you out of
thrashing it will probably speed things up, not slow them down.
I don't know what your mail volume is. If you get a lot of mail you may
need more children, or if m
40 matches
Mail list logo
