Have a look at MPP. Excellent software, nice people, great support.
http://www.messagepartners.com
And you can use SpamAssassin with it.
Patrick Sneyers
Op 14-sep-06, om 15:37 heeft Jeff het volgende geschreven:
hello,lists,
We're looking for a commerce antispam product.It should be high
p
Howdy,
This year ApacheCon will be held in Austin, Texas.
http://www.us.apachecon.com/index.html
In addition to all of the other Apache Software Foundation related talks
there will be at least two SpamAssassin talks:
High Performance Apache SpamAssassin
Extending Apache SpamAssassin Using Plug
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:27:36PM -0500, Logan Shaw wrote:
> >&Mail::SpamAssassin::Util::secure_tmpdir called at
>
> Since Mail::SpamAssassin::Util::secure_tmpdir is part of the
> SpamAssassin install. Sounds like you may have an out of
> date version of SpamAssassin that isn't new enough to hav
On Thursday 14 September 2006 6:05 am, Loren Wilton wrote:
> I wonder what a "False-Spam-Checker" might be?
>
> Loren
>
>
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from lost.lost.hu ([212.52.166.101])
> by mx-pigeons.atl.sa.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with SMTP id
> 1gnDqV1l
Anthony, when Jeff remarked "millions" I thought of his countryman
who was here awhile back and talked about taking at least the rules
engine from SpamAssassin into C language, This limited rules a little,
But it made everything run somewhat faster, which was desperately
needed because they were s
From: "Jim Maul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Richard Collyer wrote:
We're looking for a commerce antispam product.It should be high
performance and has the strong ability to capture spams.
Could you recommend me a good product about it?We are an ISP,have
millions of users.
(Please don't say Symantec's
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Robert S wrote:
FuzzyOCR - visit the wiki plugins page. It helps.
{^_^}
Thanks. Done that. A couple of things. I get this message:
[8321] dbg: plugin: registering glue method for fuzzyocr_check
(FuzzyOcr=HASH(0xf2f140))
[8321] warn: rules: failed to run FUZZY_OCR test,
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:00:31PM -, Dhaval Patel wrote:
> > Is there any info on how to enable/disable/write my own rules?
>
> Yes. Enabling is simple, just have the rule in place. Disabling is simple,
> just set the score for the rule to 0. Wr
FuzzyOCR - visit the wiki plugins page. It helps.
{^_^}
Thanks. Done that. A couple of things. I get this message:
[8321] dbg: plugin: registering glue method for fuzzyocr_check
(FuzzyOcr=HASH(0xf2f140))
[8321] warn: rules: failed to run FUZZY_OCR test, skipping:
[8321] warn: (Undefined sub
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Dhaval Patel wrote:
SpamAssassin comes with a whole bunch of rules by default.
The best thing is to look at those rules and see what they're
doing. There's probably real documentation somewhere, but
there is so much example code that you may not need it.
I did not see much
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Dhaval Patel wrote:
3. I did not clear explaination on how exactly the rbl_checks work. Can I
specify
which rbl to use and not use? I also could not find any information on which
connections to allow on the firewall to allow these checks. Our server is not
allowed
to make
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:00:31PM -, Dhaval Patel wrote:
> Is there any info on how to enable/disable/write my own rules?
Yes. Enabling is simple, just have the rule in place. Disabling is simple,
just set the score for the rule to 0. Writing your own is a little harder...
If you do a "per
> > 3. I did not clear explaination on how exactly the rbl_checks work. Can I
> > specify
> >which rbl to use and not use? I also could not find any information on which
> >connections to allow on the firewall to allow these checks. Our server is
> >not allowed
> >to make any outgoing connecti
good evening all ,
all my question was on the subject.
Can i use MySQL pref when i cal spamd from amavisd ?
And if i can, how can i use it ?
Because i have seen sa can use Mysql when it's called with -q..
I don't call SA but spamd it is the same ?
Thanks for your reply, and have a good night :-
> SpamAssassin comes with a whole bunch of rules by default.
> The best thing is to look at those rules and see what they're
> doing. There's probably real documentation somewhere, but
> there is so much example code that you may not need it.
I did not see much in the local.cf after a fresh inst
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Dhaval Patel wrote:
> I found the following which contains rules. http://bl.csma.biz/csma.cf
>
> From looking at these rules, it would seem that my server would
> query bl.csma.biz to see if the IP the email came from is on their
> list. Which means that I would have to allow
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:34:35PM -, Dhaval Patel wrote:
> 1. From reading the docs I think using spamd and spamc (not spamassassin)
> would be the
> best. Is that what people in this group would recommend? Any reasons why not?
Generally speaking you want to use spamc/spamd instead of spamas
I am looking to install and configure spamassassin on my debian sarge server
with about
15 users. We have been getting lots of spam lately and spambayes is not cutting
it. We
need to use the rbl_check feature with spambayes to reduce the spams getting to
our inbox.
I have a few questions:
1. F
>> On Thursday, September 14, 2006 9:06 AM + Michele Petrazzo
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > always, when I install spamassassin to my custumers, I create them a imap
>> > account (called normally spam), that has two folders, spam and no-spam,
>> > where the users move the "not sign
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Ben Wylie wrote:
> The FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD rule seems to hit falsely.
> I am using SpamAssassin 3.1.2 on Windows 2003 Server.
>
> Can anyone see why the following headers hit this rule?
> The email was a genuine yahoo email from a friend telling me about a
> photo album he had
OK, solved by an upgrade to 3.1.4
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Why-is-ALL_TRUSTED-fireing-here--tf2272019.html#a6313754
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.
Loren Wilton wrote:
> > Correction! That should be:
> >
> > /htt(p|ps):\/\/.*?\/.*\.com$/i
> >
> > and slightly more efficient (doesn't capture backreference):
> >
> > /htt(?:p|ps):\/\/.*?\/.*\.com$/i
>
> Or maybe more simply and readably:
>
> m'https?://.*/.*\.com$'i
>
> But the .* thing
| > We're looking for a commerce antispam product.It should be high performance
| > and has the strong ability to capture spams. Could you recommend me a good
| > product about it?We are an ISP,have millions of users. (Please don't say
| > Symantec's brightmail,it's fairly good,but it's too expensi
On Thursday, September 14, 2006 9:06 AM + Michele Petrazzo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
always, when I install spamassassin to my custumers, I create them a imap
account (called normally spam), that has two folders, spam and no-spam,
where the users move the "not signed has spam, or signed h
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:01:29PM +0800, Jeff wrote:
> Sorry for the trouble for others.I just know many antispam tech-hackers here
> including some antispam company's guys.So I ask it here,:-)
My guess is that the majority of people would say use SpamAssassin, probably
with some form of third-p
On 2006-09-13, Fábio Gomes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't mean removing EXE attachments, but blocking/high scoring messages
> with links to executables in its body.
>
> Is it possible?
I would think it would be a little tricky, as the filter would have to
follow the link to determine if
On Tue, September 12, 2006 13:31, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> http://www.canaltv.org/postcard.gif.exe";>
> And if anyone knows the people at clamav, I have submitted this nasty
> thing several times to them and they still don't have a sig for it.
i know this is in clamav, look back on this threa
Hi,
I am wondering, why for a certain email, ALL_TRUSTED is still fireing.
Sometimes, it works.
Sometimes not. I use fetchmail by the way to fetch mail from a provider. I
put 127 and my
local net into internal, these plus the provider into trusted.
I put below some headers and a snip from my l
Your answer thus: spamassassin
rgds,
Joseph
On Thursday 14 September 2006 17:01, Jeff wrote:
> Sorry for the trouble for others.I just know many antispam tech-hackers
> here including some antispam company's guys.So I ask it here,:-)
>
> -jeff
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -原始邮件-
> 发件人:"Jim Maul"
> 发送时间
We are an ISP and we proudly use amavisd + spamassassin setup and works
extremely good, and we spend just the effort to tune it.
regards,
Joseph
On Thursday 14 September 2006 16:37, Jeff wrote:
> hello,lists,
>
> We're looking for a commerce antispam product.It should be high performance
> and
Sipos Gabor wrote:
hello,lists,
We're looking for a commerce antispam product.It should be high performance and has the strong ability to capture spams.
Could you recommend me a good product about it?We are an ISP,have millions of
users.
(Please don't say Symantec's brightmail,it's fairly goo
Hi,
Fort Systems Ltd - http://www.fsl.com/
Do a product which uses Mailscanner, SpamAssassin and MailWatch. They
even do this in an appliance.
Please note that I haven't used their packages, so I can make any
recommendations. But I do use MailScanner, SpamAssassin & MailWatch on
my servers an
Sorry for the trouble for others.I just know many antispam tech-hackers here including some antispam company's guys.So I ask it here,:-)
-jeff
-原始邮件-发件人:"Jim Maul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>发送时间:2006-09-14 22:01:15收件人:users@spamassassin.apache.org抄送:(无)主题:Re: commerce Antispam ProductsRi
> hello,lists,
>
> We're looking for a commerce antispam product.It should be high performance
> and has the strong ability to capture spams.
> Could you recommend me a good product about it?We are an ISP,have millions of
> users.
> (Please don't say Symantec's brightmail,it's fairly good,but i
Richard Collyer wrote:
>> We're looking for a commerce antispam product.It should be high
>> performance and has the strong ability to capture spams.
>> Could you recommend me a good product about it?We are an ISP,have
>> millions of users.
>> (Please don't say Symantec's brightmail,it's fairly g
> We're looking for a commerce antispam product.It should be high
> performance and has the strong ability to capture spams.
> Could you recommend me a good product about it?We are an ISP,have
> millions of users.
> (Please don't say Symantec's brightmail,it's fairly good,but it's too
> expensi
hello,lists,
We're looking for a commerce antispam product.It should be high performance and has the strong ability to capture spams.
Could you recommend me a good product about it?We are an ISP,have millions of users.
(Please don't say Symantec's brightmail,it's fairly good,but it's too expensiv
Em Quarta 13 Setembro 2006 18:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
> >> Bill Randle wrote:
> >> > Amavisd-new will also drop attachments with a configurable list
> >> > of file extentions, but the question refered to links to exe's,
> >> > not actual exe attachments.
> >>
> >> Good point -- everyone's p
I have been getting a large number of messages which are not being
blocked by SA. Typically they contain a bitmapped text message with
things like "THIS ONE JUST STARTED TRADING" or "CRITICAL INVESTOR
ALERT FOR ...". Below this there are several paragraphs of
meaningless sentences and there is a
Correction! That should be:
/htt(p|ps):\/\/.*?\/.*\.com$/i
and slightly more efficient (doesn't capture backreference):
/htt(?:p|ps):\/\/.*?\/.*\.com$/i
Or maybe more simply and readably:
m'https?://.*/.*\.com$'i
But the .* things really should stop on something reasonable like > or \s o
It's true that mail can be delayed and all that, but anyway, legitimate
email usuallly has less points than spam and I think they will not go past 5
points. I gave that rule 1.5 points just for that spams that have 4 or 4.5
points
I do receive messages from people overseas, and I'm subscribe
That is one of my hacks in procmail. If mail comes in with SpamAssassin
headers I rewrite them to X-False-whatever. I used that for some
diagnostics. It was also part of one of the tricks I arranged when
spamd was failing on some messages with "full" or "rawbody". I looked
for markup and if I didn
I wonder what a "False-Spam-Checker" might be?
Loren
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lost.lost.hu ([212.52.166.101])
by mx-pigeons.atl.sa.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with SMTP id
1gnDqV1li3Nl34g0
for <>; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:42:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 9
On Wed, September 13, 2006 20:48, Fábio Gomes wrote:
> I didn't mean removing EXE attachments, but blocking/high scoring messages
> with links to executables in its body.
>
> Is it possible?
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AntiVirus
>> Or - if you are using procmail:
>> #Delete all messages w
The FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD rule seems to hit falsely.
I am using SpamAssassin 3.1.2 on Windows 2003 Server.
Can anyone see why the following headers hit this rule?
The email was a genuine yahoo email from a friend telling me about a
photo album he had put up.
* 1.8 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 'From'
John Andersen schrieb:
On Thursday 14 September 2006 00:21, Toni Casueps wrote:
It corresponds to the received header that my MTA adds, so it has the local
time when the message arrives. It matches messages that arrive from
00:00:00 to 06:59:59 (i gave it a score of 1.5).
So you have no friend
On Thursday 14 September 2006 00:21, Toni Casueps wrote:
> It corresponds to the received header that my MTA adds, so it has the local
> time when the message arrives. It matches messages that arrive from
> 00:00:00 to 06:59:59 (i gave it a score of 1.5).
So you have no friends on the opposite sid
Thanks. I searched the archives and found a link to a site that now
redirects to SARE, but I couldn't find a rule for this there. So I finally
wrote a rule that seems to work:
header RECEIVED_AT_NIGHTReceived =~ /id [^;]+; ..., \d?\d ...
\d\d\d\d 0[0-6]:\d\d:\d\d/
This matches hea
John D. Hardin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, jdow wrote:
>
>> > A suggestion: one wiki page for each rule where the description is too
>> > short to be clear, on which the rule's meaning and rationale is
>> > explained in whatever level of detail is considered adequate and
>> > clear.
>>
>>
49 matches
Mail list logo
