I am just learning to use SA with my reseller shared hosting account.
When training I tried
sa-learn --mbox --spam ~/mail/DOMAIN/ACCOUNT/learn_spam
& got something like this:
Learned tokens from 4 message(s) (17 message(s) examined)
One of my accounts on this domain I get:
Learned tokens from 0
On Sun, August 13, 2006 02:11, John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, John Rudd wrote:
>
> 127.0.0.1 ... 127.0.0.100 perhaps? How would a rule to score points
> based on the returned IP look? Can/does SA cache the returned IP and
> test it in multiple rules without making multiple DNS queries
>I'm not sure zone transfers will be feasible, since the registrar
>determination will be made dynamically.
I think, to prevent processing overloads, you might want to cache results at
least for a period of minutes and not recalculate results for every thing
query. I'm sure this isn't something th
From: "John Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If it wasn't so embedded in SLES9 I would rip it out, but doing so
breaks a lot of the standard postfix-amavis-cyrus-ldap setup for sles9.
That is one of the reasons I am not finding SLES10 at all a pleasant
alternative for FCwhatever. The ENTIRE email
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, John Rudd wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2006, at 5:11 PM, John D. Hardin wrote:
> >
> >> b) have an RBL which returns different values for different
> >> confidence levels.
> >
> > 127.0.0.1 ... 127.0.0.100 perhaps? How would a rule to score points
> > based on the returned IP look? Can
On Aug 12, 2006, at 5:11 PM, John D. Hardin wrote:
b) have an RBL which returns different values for different
confidence levels. Something like a percentage of known spammers
are on that specific provider. So, if a registrar is 60% spammers
and 40% bystanders, it will return "60"... and I
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, John Rudd wrote:
> If someone does make a Registrar RBL and a Name Server RBL (both
> of which are good ideas), _PLEASE_ do something like this:
>
> a) have two lists for each RBL, one which has the above "kill the
> bystanders" point of view, and one which is much more conse
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, Stuart Johnston wrote:
> John D. Hardin wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> >
> >> (can we come up with an RBL for domains registered with jokers?)
> >
> > A while back I suggested a more-general spammer-friendly-registrar
> > RBL.
> >
> > Can anyone
On Aug 12, 2006, at 10:26 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Whois registrat is joker
(can we come up with an RBL for domains registered with jokers?)
There are some legit domains hosted on joker :p
Ok, so out of thousands, there are 'some'.
You sleep with dogs, you get flees.
Bleh. As much
On Aug 12, 2006, at 7:42 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
It is very easy to unsubscribe at
genutrust.com/trust . It would be impossible to get all the
Even easier to add scores to SA rules so that thousands of users don't
have to individually unsubscribe from your partners lists.
Also, violatio
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, Michael Scheidell wrote:
(can we come up with an RBL for domains registered with jokers?)
A while back I suggested a more-general spammer-friendly-registrar
RBL.
Can anyone give me a seed list of the registrars we would consider
"spammer-friendly"?
On Saturday 12 August 2006 07:36, Markus Edholm wrote:
> Hi all
> I´m looking for some simple statistic script
> using amavisd and spamassassin just to se how my own and "standard"
> rules work
> I tested sa-stat.pl but it wont work on amavisd log.
> I tried to get amavis-stat to work, but there wa
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 11:32 AM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Subject: Re: SPAM: Increase in targeted spams
>
>
>
> > Whois registrat is joker
> > (can we come up with an RBL for domains registered with jokers?)
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, Michael Scheidell wrote:
(can we come up with an RBL for domains registered with jokers?)
A while back I suggested a more-general spammer-friendly-registrar
RBL.
Can anyone give me a seed list of the registrars we would consider
"spammer-friendly"?
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> (can we come up with an RBL for domains registered with jokers?)
A while back I suggested a more-general spammer-friendly-registrar
RBL.
Can anyone give me a seed list of the registrars we would consider
"spammer-friendly"? I want to try some ideas
Hi all
I´m looking for some simple statistic script
using amavisd and spamassassin just to se how my own and "standard"
rules work
I tested sa-stat.pl but it wont work on amavisd log.
I tried to get amavis-stat to work, but there was to much error for my
poor mind.
Something simple?
> -Original Message-
> From: Genutrust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 10:58 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SPAM: Increase in targeted spams
>
>
>
> Just a quick note. I am from Genutrust.com. We do not harvest
> any information, nor do
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, John Rudd wrote:
> Any service sending ads that doesn't regularly ask "still want to
> be on our list?" and automatically unsubscribe anyone who doesn't
> positively respond, has no business saying that they're not
> sending spam.
Most definitely true.
> To: Genutrust <[EMAI
So... They fabricated a mail with a fake mailer, added some fake
double-bounce headers, and then sent it to your postmaster account? That
seems exceptionally unclever of some idiot.
I just ran that twice here on an unloaded system and it took about 6.5
seconds. Only net rule it hit was spam
19 matches
Mail list logo
