On Thursday 10 August 2006 05:56, decoder wrote:
> Hello again,
>
>
> I just released a new version which contains all suggestions made here
> on the mailing list. Changelog:
>
> * Added scoring for wrong content-type
> * Added scoring for broken gif images
Decoder: Could I convince you to say WH
On Aug 10, 2006, at 9:00 PM, jdow wrote:
From: "John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Aug 10, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I've been blocking a lot of spam at connect time that I am 100% sure
is spam. However I'm wondering if that is the best idea because it
gives spammers feedback as to
On Aug 10, 2006, at 8:42 PM, jdow wrote:
I skipped step three.
{+_+}This will haunt me forever, right?
Only as long as we know you :-)
On 8/11/2006 12:02 AM, jdow wrote:
From: "Jim Maul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bowie Bailey wrote:
It doesn't really matter to me who supports which pieces as long as
they all work.
Someone may be able to fix sa-update so that it can take over from
RDJ, but as of now, that is not possible without c
From: "Jim Maul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bowie Bailey wrote:
It doesn't really matter to me who supports which pieces as long as
they all work.
Someone may be able to fix sa-update so that it can take over from
RDJ, but as of now, that is not possible without configuring about 62
sa-update channe
From: "John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Aug 10, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I've been blocking a lot of spam at connect time that I am 100% sure
is spam. However I'm wondering if that is the best idea because it
gives spammers feedback as to what works and what doesn't. If I
silent
Are you running dstat (vstat/iostat) on the SQL server? I'd be
interested in seeing what the disk/mem/procs are doing during a load
situation. We don't have 9m rows in ours but with 1m and a simple
processor (ht) with 4gb of ram it works without any significant
problems.
We are seeing on the o
From: "Gary G. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thursday 10 August 2006 13:11, Kurt Buff wrote:
| From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| > jdow wrote:
| >> I've been noticing that this seems to be cropping up in an
|
| awful lot
|
| >> in the righ
From: "Kelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Actually spelled correctly but I picked the wrong synonym. So it was a
case of synonymitis. (Yeah, I admit I am prone to neologisms.)
{^_-}
Nope. "righting" isn't a synonym for "writing". :p
Homophonitis, perhaps?
Yup - I ski
- Original Message -
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 16:00
Subject: [ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad?
jdow wrote:
From: "John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Aug 9, 2006, at 8:08 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
jdow wrote:
I've been
On 8/11/06, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DAve wrote:
> Panagiotis Christias wrote:
>> On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from sha1sum.
>>> Does FreeBSD have a sha1sum that produces the format that you showed?
>>>
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 22:35 -0400, DAve wrote:
> DAve wrote:
> > Panagiotis Christias wrote:
> >> On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from sha1sum.
> >>> Does FreeBSD have a sha1sum that produces the format that you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This has been seen on a variety of systems, from my own small 1Ghz AMD system to
dual xeon w/ SCSI drives
On my somewhat slowish system:
sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000
DAve wrote:
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from sha1sum.
Does FreeBSD have a sha1sum that produces the format that you showed?
Answering my own question, FreeBSD seems to not have a "s
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from sha1sum.
Does FreeBSD have a sha1sum that produces the format that you showed?
Answering my own question, FreeBSD seems to not have a "sha1sum",
but
On 8/11/06, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, the format sa-update expects is the standard format from sha1sum.
Does FreeBSD have a sha1sum that produces the format that you showed?
Answering my own question, FreeBSD seems to not have a "sha1sum",
but has a "sha1" which has that k
On Aug 10, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I've been blocking a lot of spam at connect time that I am 100% sure
is spam. However I'm wondering if that is the best idea because it
gives spammers feedback as to what works and what doesn't. If I
silently absorb the spam and let the spammers
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Randomly Generated Tagline:
> "... specially formulated so more nutrition stays in your cat." - Iams
IAMS doesn't seem to be barfed with any less frequency than any other
cat food brand we've tried, so they're obviously not using an
anti-emetic ingred
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Craig Morrison wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Logan Shaw wrote:
So... is it safe to assume their servers are configured
incorrectly? Or should our MTA be somehow adding that
header if it's missing? Or is there some other way that our
MailScanner+SpamAssassin combo sh
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Logan Shaw wrote:
So I looked in my own personal mailbox to see which messages
have Return-Path headers, and out of the hundreds of messages
in there, basically all messages do have a Return-Path header,
except that not a single one from from majo
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Actually spelled correctly but I picked the wrong synonym. So it was a
case of synonymitis. (Yeah, I admit I am prone to neologisms.)
{^_-}
Nope. "righting" isn't a synonym for "writing". :p
Homophonitis, perhaps?
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Logan Shaw wrote:
So I looked in my own personal mailbox to see which messages
have Return-Path headers, and out of the hundreds of messages
in there, basically all messages do have a Return-Path header,
except that not a single one from from majorcustomer.com does.
S
Logan Shaw wrote:
So I looked in my own personal mailbox to see which messages
have Return-Path headers, and out of the hundreds of messages
in there, basically all messages do have a Return-Path header,
except that not a single one from from majorcustomer.com does.
So... is it safe to assume
Hey everyone,
Our company happens to have a major customer who publishes an
SPF record for their domain, so I decided to whitelist them
with an entry like
spf_whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, in my tests (and in the logs), they are not hitting
that rule. Grabbing one of the me
jdow wrote:
From: "John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Aug 9, 2006, at 8:08 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
jdow wrote:
I've been noticing that this seems to be cropping up in an awful lot
in the righting committed by younger folks. It contributes to the
impression that even college graduates th
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 06:03:23PM -0400, DAve wrote:
> >For now, you may want to either do the openssl redirect thing, or use
> >build/sha1sum.pl from the tarball. Both produce the expected format.
>
> Hmm my 3.1.1 doesn't have sha1sum.pl in build, contrib, or tools. But
> how hard can a wrappe
In the past we have seen some slowness for bayes and AWL (mostly AWL).
We found after a couple million rows in AWL that the system starts
getting real slow. We setup a script to prune records that have a high
bayes threshold but a count of 1 (usually anonymous spammers). They
will not use that IP
* Nigel Frankcom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/263
>
> A few options there... - though it could as easily be their building
> address...
I'd rather go for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/263_(number)
and then settle for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chen_prime
--
Ralf Hildebr
signature last,
(/data/data/lastremaining.com/public_html/updates/tls-local/20060810.tar.gz)=
8918d6852caab9e57f645e0ff8510c3026fdedd2
Line 524 in sa-update is the failure I believe. I suspect anyone
creating a channel on FreeBSD may have the same problem.
FWIW, the format sa-update expects is
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:04:06 -0400, Bill Horne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:29:36PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> > All-numeric domains are popular in China because they are easier for
>> > people to deal with than alphabetic d
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:29:36PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > All-numeric domains are popular in China because they are easier for
> > people to deal with than alphabetic domains. For example, 263.com is
> > China's second-largest ISP. You can't just a
(would all be one line) have the signature
first,
f7c3edde6e9e2330318c3fc6a8e70af68387eaeb
/home/updatesd/tmp/stage/3.2.0/update.tgzSHA1
My sha1 contents (would all be one line) have the signature last,
(/data/data/lastremaining.com/public_html/updates/tls-local/20060
I got one of these too...
>>> Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8/8/2006 8:07 AM >>>
--On Tuesday, August 08, 2006 10:27 AM +0200 Patrick Sneyers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Received in my .mac (basically a spam bin) account.
> http://www.triksys.be/docspam.jpg = screenshot of word doc attache
signature last,
> (/data/data/lastremaining.com/public_html/updates/tls-local/20060810.tar.gz)=
> 8918d6852caab9e57f645e0ff8510c3026fdedd2
>
> Line 524 in sa-update is the failure I believe. I suspect anyone
> creating a channel on FreeBSD may have the same problem.
FWIW, the f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings...
On the Maia Mailguard mailing list, we have encountered a number of folks
(myself included) that are seeing some slow performance in the bayes storage
when using mysql (innodb engine), taking anywhere from .5 to 10 seconds to
store/update
I have been battling this for a few
weeks now and I am desperate for a solution. We have a virutal dedicated server
and regrettably agreed to use Plesk for control panel interface (not realizing
how horrible Plesk is to work with).
Plesk has SpamAssassin and MailEnable installed.
Spamassa
Marc said:
>I've been blocking a lot of spam at connect time that I am 100% sure is
>spam. However I'm wondering if that is the best idea because it gives
>spammers feedback as to what works and what doesn't. If I silently
>absorb the spam and let the spammers think it's delivered then they have
What does this error mean? Aug 10 14:15:10 newton spamc[24853]:
gethostbyname() failed: h_errno=3
Thanks in advance.
/home/updatesd/tmp/stage/3.2.0/update.tgzSHA1
My sha1 contents (would all be one line) have the signature last,
(/data/data/lastremaining.com/public_html/updates/tls-local/20060810.tar.gz)=
8918d6852caab9e57f645e0ff8510c3026fdedd2
521 # Validate the SHA1 signature before going forward with mo
> I've been blocking a lot of spam at connect time that I am 100% sure is
> spam. However I'm wondering if that is the best idea because it gives
> spammers feedback as to what works and what doesn't. If I silently
> absorb the spam and let the spammers think it's delivered then they have
> no way
Perhaps it could be as simple as only updating existing rules for your
installation? In other words, you would have to download the CF file and
install it first (but you would do this anyways to test!!!). Then sa-update
could simply parse your rules directory and update rules found there
accordin
My personal opinion is that the spammers don't care either way.
My guess would be that they probably don't even bother checking the logs
of what worked and what didn't on the zombie PCs they hijack to send the
crap in the first place.
Probably far easier to just fire and forget.
-Mike
Marc
I've been blocking a lot of spam at connect time that I am 100% sure is
spam. However I'm wondering if that is the best idea because it gives
spammers feedback as to what works and what doesn't. If I silently
absorb the spam and let the spammers think it's delivered then they have
no way to kno
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Possibly. It depends on the overhead involved in setting up the
channels.
Plus, not all of us want ALL 62 files!
Some of the *[0-3] files say to use 70_abcd0.cf , or _1, or_2, or_3.
Would need tome cf
On Thursday 10 August 2006 13:11, Kurt Buff wrote:
> | From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |
> | > jdow wrote:
> | >> I've been noticing that this seems to be cropping up in an
> |
> | awful lot
> |
> | >> in the righting committed by younger fo
| From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| > jdow wrote:
| >> I've been noticing that this seems to be cropping up in an
| awful lot
| >> in the righting committed by younger folks. It contributes to the
| >> impression that even college graduates
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Possibly. It depends on the overhead involved in setting up the
channels.
>
> Plus, not all of us want ALL 62 files!
>
> Some of the *[0-3] files say to use 70_abcd0.cf , or _1, or_2, or_3.
>
> Would need tome cf f
Thank you that seemed to do it
I had only done a reload after doing postsuper -r ALL
Stopping and starting fixed it
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Gary V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 10:27 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Content Filter
> -Original Message-
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 2:45 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Image spam with inline jpeg image
>
>
Possibly. It depends on the overhead involved in setting up
> the channels.
>
Plus,
Jim Maul wrote:
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> > It doesn't really matter to me who supports which pieces as long as
> > they all work.
> >
> > Someone may be able to fix sa-update so that it can take over from
> > RDJ, but as of now, that is not possible without configuring about
> > 62 sa-update ch
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:55:30AM -0700, Dave . wrote:
> foreach my $p ( $pms->{msg}->find_parts("image") ) {
>Does this mean the message must have the text "image" and/or "image/gif"
>within the body? Many of the "penny stock" spam gifs I get appear as follows:
Generally speaking, RTM (Mail::S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave . wrote:
> Give them code from Ocr.pm:
>
> --- foreach my $p (
> $pms->{msg}->find_parts("image") ) { my ( $ctype, $boundary,
> $charset, $name ) = Mail::SpamAssassin::Util::parse_content_type(
> $p->get_header('content-type') ); i
Give them code from Ocr.pm:--- foreach my $p ( $pms->{msg}->find_parts("image") ) { my ( $ctype, $boundary, $charset, $name ) =Mail::SpamAssassin::Util::parse_content_type( $p->get_header('content-type') ); if ( $ctype eq "image/gif" ) { open OCR, "
Bowie Bailey wrote:
It doesn't really matter to me who supports which pieces as long as
they all work.
Someone may be able to fix sa-update so that it can take over from
RDJ, but as of now, that is not possible without configuring about 62
sa-update channels (one for each ruleset RDJ manages).
Jim Maul wrote:
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > Bret Miller wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gary Funck wrote:
> > > > > > Has anyone considered also supplying new rules in the
> > > > > > form of rpm's available via a yum-compatible repository?
> > > > > > It'd be nice to have the usual versioning a
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Bret Miller wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gary Funck wrote:
Has anyone considered also supplying new rules in the
form of rpm's available via a yum-compatible repository?
It'd be nice to have the usual versioning and logging
support as well as a central update facility. This
c
Bret Miller wrote:
> > > On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gary Funck wrote:
> > > > Has anyone considered also supplying new rules in the
> > > > form of rpm's available via a yum-compatible repository?
> > > > It'd be nice to have the usual versioning and logging
> > > > support as well as a central update fac
Bret Miller wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:58:19AM -0700, Richard wrote:
>>> rules_du_jour was done when sa-update did not exists
>> are you implying that sa-update replaces rules-du-jour?
>
> That depends on what you mean by "replaces".
>
>> i though sa-update
> i am reading the link
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo
>
> then the .pm file and do not have a plugins directory. where
> does the .pm
> file go?
> i assume the .cf goes in /etc/mail/spamassassin
>
> and i edit v310.pre then restart spamd
It is probably best to put the plugin
> > On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gary Funck wrote:
> > > Has anyone considered also supplying new rules in the
> > > form of rpm's available via a yum-compatible repository?
> > > It'd be nice to have the usual versioning and logging
> > > support as well as a central update facility. This
> > > could be d
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:58:19AM -0700, Richard wrote:
> >>> rules_du_jour was done when sa-update did not exists
> >> are you implying that sa-update replaces rules-du-jour?
> >
> > That depends on what you mean by "replaces".
> >
> >> i though sa-update updat
My Log File is filling up with this error message
warning: connect to transport spamassassin: Connection refused
This is after I installed amavis
I had previously had spamassassin working perfectly
I have a working installation but I am getting this warning.
Spamassassin via amavis is workin
Hi
this is the first spam i have seen with this header
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on
proteus2.obantec.net
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.5 tests=none autolearn=failed
version=3.1.3
Subject: Fwd: You Need a Better Degree,{} and we can Help!
b
decoder writes:
>Coffey, Neal wrote:
>> decoder wrote:
>>> You can now obtain the plugin as a tarball, the download URL is
>>> at the end of the wiki page.
>>> (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin)
>>>
>>
>> I haven't installed this plugin on my systems yet, but I've been
>> watchin
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 04:42:00PM +0200, decoder wrote:
> Is there a way to make the OCR Plugin run as one of the last tests?
You can set priority for a rule (RTM for details).
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Is that seat saved? No, but we are praying for it...
pgp4hs4zGu9QQ.pgp
Description:
My Log File is filling up with this error message
warning: connect to transport spamassassin: Connection refused
This is after I installed amavis
I had previously had spamassassin working perfectly
I have a working installation but I am getting this warning.
Spamassassin via amavis is working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Coffey, Neal wrote:
> decoder wrote:
>> You can now obtain the plugin as a tarball, the download URL is
>> at the end of the wiki page.
>> (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin)
>>
>
> I haven't installed this plugin on my systems yet, bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Just one precision on the wiki page. For Fedora Core 5 you should
install the package libgif-utils where resides the giffix program.
Regards,
Max
decoder escribió:
> decoder wrote:
>>> Hello there,
>>>
>>> I have improved the original OcrPlug
decoder wrote:
> You can now obtain the plugin as a tarball, the download URL is at the
> end of the wiki page.
> (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin)
>
I haven't installed this plugin on my systems yet, but I've been
watching it pretty closely (and I'm sorely tempted to put it i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Keller wrote:
> decoder wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> decoder wrote:
>>
>>> Hello there,
>>>
>>> I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin), so it contain
decoder wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
decoder wrote:
Hello there,
I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin), so it contains
fuzzy matching. Like that, mistakes made by the OCR recognition or
intentional obfuscatio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
decoder wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I have improved the original OcrPlugin (found at
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OcrPlugin), so it contains
> fuzzy matching. Like that, mistakes made by the OCR recognition or
> intentional obfuscations in the
From: "John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
I'm younger than the folks that REALLY learned to spell.
And I do wonder why I made that typo. Either of my parents would have
had my skin for doing that.
{O.O}
*I* gave you the benefit of the doubt and assumed you'
From: "John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Aug 9, 2006, at 8:08 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
jdow wrote:
I've been noticing that this seems to be cropping up in an awful lot
in the righting committed by younger folks. It contributes to the
impression that even college graduates these days are
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:43:24AM +0200, decoder wrote:
>
> You can find a full description and an example in the wiki under:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
>
>
> Ideas for improvements or critics are always welcome :)
>
>
Hi,
First, thanks for working on such a gr
On Wed, August 9, 2006 22:01, Gary Funck wrote:
> could be done as a gateway to sa-update, perhaps
> providing the updates in other package formats as well.
rpm packages does not install sa-update ?
i know yum, but dont make it the better sa-update :-)
it was worse enogh with rulesdujour
--
Ben
> http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5041
Thanks!
> Mark -- may I upload that sample to this bug? Without it, everyone
> else will be unable to reproduce the issue, test fixes, etc.
You may.
I'll see if I can find a suitable uuencoded publicly-viewable
example for upload too
Mark Martinec writes:
> Justin,
>
> > Mark -- can you mail a *real* sample? private mail would be fine.
>
> It is coming your way (private) in a minute or two.
> It is a real sample, the only change I made is to
> replace the From and To header, so that it looks like
> a mail from me to you, su
On Thursday 10 August 2006 00:07, Mike Kenny wrote:
> respond with any of the following:
>
> a) which files to look at for clues
> b) a good starter or howto on spamassassin
> c) pointer to where my problems are
> d) anything that you feel may be helpful
Sheesh! Tall request.
Amavisd is responsi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill Landry wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Spamassassin List"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 2:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Improved OCR Plugin with approximate matching
>
>>> Spamassassin List wrote:
>> decod
On 8/10/2006 4:24 AM, Matthias Keller wrote:
Hi
I want to take an upstream spamfilter into account.
If it thinks it's spam it adds the following header to the mail:
X-Spam-Classification: spam
But my rule
header MKE_UP_SPAM X-Spam-Classification =~ /spam/i
describe MKE_UP_SPAM
Hi
I want to take an upstream spamfilter into account.
If it thinks it's spam it adds the following header to the mail:
X-Spam-Classification: spam
But my rule
header MKE_UP_SPAM X-Spam-Classification =~ /spam/i
describe MKE_UP_SPAMupstream spamfilter thinks it's spam
score M
Pardon me if much of this has been covered in the past. I have browsed
the archives but could find nothing that seemed to addres my rather
basic questions.
First some background, though my question may be somewhat basic, myt
setup is not. I have inherited a system that is running postfix,
clamd,
> > yum install libungif* will get both libungif and libungif-progs (which
> > contains giffix)
I'm using Debian (Sarge) and I think libungif-bin is here the better package.
giflib-bin wants to install the packages libx11-6, xfree86-common, xlibs-data
additionaly. Which means 10MB more than inst
Just a little typo I think:
On the wiki it says:
"... focr_tmp_path - String determining the absolute path to a directory where
the plugin may write temporary files to (without trailing slash) focr_verbosity
-
Verbose level (0 - 2). ..."
As far as I found out it should be "focr_verbose" and no
85 matches
Mail list logo
