My set up is:
- Fedora Core 5
- Postfix 2.2.8-1.2
- Spamassassin 3.1.3-1.fc5
- Procmail 3.22-16.2.1
- Fetchmail 6.3.4-0.fc5.1
I use fetchmail to get mail from all my different ISP mailboxes. These
then get delivered on my local machine by postfix which calls procmail
in main.cf like this:
mailbo
Greeting,
I've added a few enhancements to the ImageInfo plugin for SpamAssassin.
You can get it from..
http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo
Updates:
- added optimization changes by Theo Van Dinter
- added jpeg support
- added function image_named()
- added function image_size_e
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 14:38 -0700, Gary Funck wrote:
> Bill Randle wrote:
> > I don't have the OCR plugin installed, but am using the recently
> > posted ImageInfo plugin. This is what I get on spam-gif-1.txt:
> >
> > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=20.6 required=5.0
> > tests=BAYES_99,DC_GIF_MULTI_LAR
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 18:29:04 +0200, Arik Funke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Nigel Frankcom wrote:
>>> On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:08:45 +0200, Arik Raffael Funke
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
use_auto_whitelist 0
use_bayes 0
add_header all Report _REPORT_
>>
Bill Randle wrote:
> I don't have the OCR plugin installed, but am using the recently
> posted ImageInfo plugin. This is what I get on spam-gif-1.txt:
>
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=20.6 required=5.0
> tests=BAYES_99,DC_GIF_MULTI_LARGO,EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,
> HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,HTML
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 13:29 -0700, Gary Funck wrote:
> Two graphic-laden spams came in this AM that missed being scored
> high enough to be detected as spam:
> http://intrepid.com/~gary/spam-gif-1.txt
> http://intrepid.com/~gary/spam-gif-2.txt
> The first is just shy of the 5.0 threshold, but the s
Two graphic-laden spams came in this AM that missed being scored
high enough to be detected as spam:
http://intrepid.com/~gary/spam-gif-1.txt
http://intrepid.com/~gary/spam-gif-2.txt
The first is just shy of the 5.0 threshold, but the second misses
by a full point.
Am wondering how these fare on
Craig Morrison wrote:
Arik Raffael Funke wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:08:45 +0200, Arik Raffael Funke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
how to I get spamd/spamc to always add the spamassassin report
headers? I.e. also to ham messages...
I have the following in my local.cf and
On Sat, August 5, 2006 21:22, David Baron wrote:
> On Saturday 05 August 2006 20:24, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> On Thu, August 3, 2006 16:13, David Baron wrote:
>> > SpamCop has disabled subscriptions to mailing lists several times because
>> > of erroneous alerting. I have reported them to my provid
On Saturday 05 August 2006 20:24, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Thu, August 3, 2006 16:13, David Baron wrote:
> > SpamCop has disabled subscriptions to mailing lists several times because
> > of erroneous alerting. I have reported them to my provider's "abuse"
> > handlers. I therefore do not recommen
Arik Raffael Funke wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:08:45 +0200, Arik Raffael Funke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
how to I get spamd/spamc to always add the spamassassin report
headers? I.e. also to ham messages...
I have the following in my local.cf and user_pref.cf but to no
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:08:45 +0200, Arik Raffael Funke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
how to I get spamd/spamc to always add the spamassassin report headers?
I.e. also to ham messages...
I have the following in my local.cf and user_pref.cf but to no apparent use:
use_auto_wh
Hello there,
since I read it in the todo of the OCR Plugin that the words are still
hardcoded and since I wanted to contribute something too, I modified the
plugin so the words can be configured in the cf file...
I have attached both the new pm file and the cf file.
If you like it, please put i
On Thu, August 3, 2006 16:13, David Baron wrote:
> SpamCop has disabled subscriptions to mailing lists several times because of
> erroneous alerting. I have reported them to my provider's "abuse" handlers. I
> therefore do not recommend SpamCop.
http://www.spamcop.net
http://www.spamcop.com
with
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Wylie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 2:38 PM
Subject: 0451.com
> A question for those of you who have large databases of spam and ham to
> check, do genuine emails come from the domain 0451.com or whether it is
> genuinely just
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 16:33, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 August 2006 23:05, Anderson, Bill took the opportunity to
say:
> > I am seeing these lines in my debug logs:
> >
> > dbg: spf: no suitable relay for spf use found, skipping SPF-helo check
> > dbg: spf: no suitable relay fo
On Fri, August 4, 2006 05:06, jdow wrote:
> For that matter, how in would an IMAP MUA handle BCC?
the exact same way as squirrelmaill :-)
--
Benny
Seems to be working well. But before this new rule set the old spam
poisoned my bayes so I just purged all my bayes and starting over. That
way I won't get bayes_00 lowering the point score.
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:08:45 +0200, Arik Raffael Funke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>how to I get spamd/spamc to always add the spamassassin report headers?
>I.e. also to ham messages...
>
>I have the following in my local.cf and user_pref.cf but to no apparent use:
>
>use_auto_whitelist 0
>
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:08:45 +0200, Arik Raffael Funke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>how to I get spamd/spamc to always add the spamassassin report headers?
>I.e. also to ham messages...
>
>I have the following in my local.cf and user_pref.cf but to no apparent use:
>
>use_auto_whitelist 0
>
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:38:56 +0100, Ben Wylie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>A question for those of you who have large databases of spam and ham to
>check, do genuine emails come from the domain 0451.com or whether it is
>genuinely just spam?
>
>I get a lot of spam claiming to be from emails on th
Hi,
how to I get spamd/spamc to always add the spamassassin report headers?
I.e. also to ham messages...
I have the following in my local.cf and user_pref.cf but to no apparent use:
use_auto_whitelist 0
use_bayes 0
add_header all Report _REPORT_
add_header all Status _YESNO_, hits=_HITS_ requ
A question for those of you who have large databases of spam and ham to
check, do genuine emails come from the domain 0451.com or whether it is
genuinely just spam?
I get a lot of spam claiming to be from emails on this domain, and if
there really are no genuine emails coming from that domain,
23 matches
Mail list logo
