Robert Nicholson wrote:
> Can anybody tell me why the X-Spam headers are put at the top?
Yes, because doing otherwise will break DomainKeys signatures.
>
> Any chance I can set it so that it always puts the X-Spam headers
> after From:?
You can hack the code to do it, but I'd suggest not doing so b
Can anybody tell me why the X-Spam headers are put at the top?
Any chance I can set it so that it always puts the X-Spam headers
after From:?
On 7/16/06, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The comment was off-hand and not researched. One of my earliest
ISPs recommended Spamassassin when it was just a bunch of scripts
written by some woman who's name escapes me.
I suspect you're thinking of SpamBouncer. Catherine A. Hampton.
O
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 09:30:46PM -0500, Robert Nicholson wrote:
> So these dbm databases seem to be platform dependent so how can you
> export from one platform and import to another?
They're Berkeley DB files, so you can use the appropriate BDB tools
to dump/load.
For bayes there's also the
Robert Nicholson wrote:
> So these dbm databases seem to be platform dependent so how can you
> export from one platform and import to another?
>
For bayes, check out the "--backup" and "--restore" options to sa-learn:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
For the AWL..
So these dbm databases seem to be platform dependent so how can you
export from one platform and import to another?
pi maybe? (I've made some "for rules developer modifications".)
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "sokka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 19:23
Subject: Re: sa-learn problem
Hi,
What is the your version number ?
regards
On 7/17/0
Hi,
Which mail server are you trying toimtegrate this spam assassin?
regards
On 7/17/06, jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> I'm looking to setup multiple actions for SpamAssassin on my server.
> I would like any emails above a certain score to be automatically> deleted,
Hi,
What is the your version number ?
regards
On 7/17/06, jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "David Corbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I posted this several days ago, and have seen no response. As well as trying> to get help via IRC. Is that tough a problem for everyone?>> ---
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm looking to setup multiple actions for SpamAssassin on my server.
I would like any emails above a certain score to be automatically
deleted, while messages with lower scores are marked as spam. Is it
possible to configure this? If so, how would I go about doi
From: "David Corbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I posted this several days ago, and have seen no response. As well as trying
to get help via IRC. Is that tough a problem for everyone?
---
I'm having a problem with sa-learn (version 3.1). Here's a snipit of the
debug output:
John Andersen wrote:
The comment was off-hand and not researched. One of my earliest
ISPs recommended Spamassassin when it was just a bunch of scripts
written by some woman who's name escapes me.
That must have been Justine. ;)
On Sunday 16 July 2006 06:44 am, Faisal N Jawdat wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2006, at 1:00 AM, John Andersen wrote:
> > And yet, in spite of your statistics, there is more spam than ever.
> > Some estimates are that in excess of 95% of all email is spam.
>
> I'm unconvinced of this -- my spam load has leve
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 06:19:49PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would like any emails above a certain score to be automatically
> deleted, while messages with lower scores are marked as spam. Is it
> possible to configure this? If so, how would I go about doing so?
http://wiki.apache.
I'm looking to setup multiple actions for SpamAssassin on my server.
I would like any emails above a certain score to be automatically
deleted, while messages with lower scores are marked as spam. Is it
possible to configure this? If so, how would I go about doing so?
On Sunday 16 July 2006 06:35 am, Shane Williams wrote:
> I never realized SpamAssassin was started back in 1994. What version
> number was that? I'd say it was definitely ahead of its time, since I
> almost never got email spam until around 1996-1997
The comment was off-hand and not researched.
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/dcorbin/.spamassassin/bayes_*
R/W:
tie failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
ERROR: the Bayes learn function returned an error, please re-run with -D
for
more information
--end--
The .spamassassin directory is rwx for me, and all the files in i
Heute (17.07.2006/01:19 Uhr) schrieb David Corbin,
> I posted this several days ago, and have seen no response. As well as trying
> to get help via IRC. Is that tough a problem for everyone?
> ---
> I'm having a problem with sa-learn (version 3.1). Here's a snipit of the
> debu
I posted this several days ago, and have seen no response. As well as trying
to get help via IRC. Is that tough a problem for everyone?
---
I'm having a problem with sa-learn (version 3.1). Here's a snipit of the
debug output:
---begin--
[787] dbg: locker: safe
From: "Alexander Piavka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 23:16, Alexander Piavka took the opportunity to write:
> Hi , i'd like to know if its possbile and how, to ignore specific rule
> scores (like ALL_TRUSTED) then calculating the au
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 July 2006 23:16, Alexander Piavka took the opportunity to write:
> > Hi , i'd like to know if its possbile and how, to ignore specific rule
> > scores (like ALL_TRUSTED) then calculating the autolearn threshold for
> > spam and ham?
>
>
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006, John Andersen wrote:
> On Saturday 15 July 2006 08:49 pm, jdow wrote:
> > Somehow I figure a better than 1200:1 scoring ratio is a pretty lopsided
> > win for SpamAssassin.
>
> And yet, in spite of your statistics, there is more spam than ever.
> Some estimates are that in ex
On Jul 16, 2006, at 1:00 AM, John Andersen wrote:
And yet, in spite of your statistics, there is more spam than ever.
Some estimates are that in excess of 95% of all email is spam.
I'm unconvinced of this -- my spam load has leveled off at 200 per
day. On the order of 1 per week makes it int
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006, John Andersen wrote:
On Saturday 15 July 2006 03:08 am, Loren Wilton wrote:
and if spammers weren't so
incompetent in general it would be even harder than it is.
An odd comment, especially for a project like Spamassassin which
has had to run full out for the last dozen ye
From: "John Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
And yet, in spite of your statistics, there is more spam than ever.
Some estimates are that in excess of 95% of all email is spam.
They're trying harder. We ARE keeping it out of user's mailboxes. I
consider that a win. I consider it a real win that th
25 matches
Mail list logo
