On Saturday 15 July 2006 08:49 pm, jdow wrote:
> Somehow I figure a better than 1200:1 scoring ratio is a pretty lopsided
> win for SpamAssassin.
And yet, in spite of your statistics, there is more spam than ever.
Some estimates are that in excess of 95% of all email is spam.
If it didn't pay, no
First unlearn that one message. Then read the rest of this message and
use sa-learn properly for your mail storage format.
Then do it correctly. You're obviously running mbox format for your spam
store. So you need to include --mbox as an option on sa-learn.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
Fr
From: "John Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Saturday 15 July 2006 03:08 am, Loren Wilton wrote:
and if spammers weren't so
incompetent in general it would be even harder than it is.
An odd comment, especially for a project like Spamassassin which
has had to run full out for the last dozen ye
Subject: Re: Why is there so much hype behind Image spam
Date: Saturday 15 July 2006 08:15 pm
From: John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: spamassassin-users@incubator.apache.org
On Saturday 15 July 2006 03:08 am, Loren Wilton wrote:
> and if spammers weren't so
> incompetent in general it would b
Hello all! I am mostly a lurker here on this list. I have been using
spamassassin for about 2 months now. I use it in a site-wide config on
an OES-Linux server (based on SLES9). I use hula as my email server with
spamd. I noticed that my emails are not marked with any "spam" headings,
so i looked i
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jul 14, 2006, at 9:32 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
I have the following test rule in my local.cf:
header LOCAL_MISSING_MSGID MESSAGEID =~ /^UNSET$/ [if-unset:
UNSET]
describe LOCAL_MISSING_MSGIDMissing Message-Id header
score LOCAL_MISSING_MSGID 0.010
Thanks! That solved my problem. Do you know why my previous rule, using
UNSET, doesn't work?
Haven't a clue. I've never used that form.
Next question: how can I obtain "message" the way spamassassin sees it,
not in its final form (altered by MTA+SA)?
Look into 'report_safe'. You can wrap t
Steve Thomas wrote:
>
> Hi Yossi,
>
>> My mail relay is built on sendmail and MailScanner configured
>> wit SA 3.1.1.
>> ...
>> How do i start spamc?
>
> IIRC, MailScanner loads the SpamAssassin perl modules directly - it
> doesn't use spamc/d, nor does it use the "spamassassin" script.
>
> H
On Jul 14, 2006, at 9:32 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
I have the following test rule in my local.cf:
header LOCAL_MISSING_MSGID MESSAGEID =~ /^UNSET$/ [if-unset:
UNSET]
describe LOCAL_MISSING_MSGIDMissing Message-Id header
score LOCAL_MISSING_MSGID 0.010
header__HAVE_MSGIDe
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 23:16, Alexander Piavka took the opportunity to write:
> Hi , i'd like to know if its possbile and how, to ignore specific rule
> scores (like ALL_TRUSTED) then calculating the autolearn threshold for
> spam and ham?
"Like" ALL_TRUSTED, eh? If you have a problem with ALL_
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 06:16, John D. Hardin took the opportunity to write:
> Rejecting (bouncing) spam
Isn't there any sort of consensus about the terminology? I like to say
that "reject" means giving a negative (permanent (5xx) or temporary (4xx))
reply to a command, whereas "bounce" means
I'd have said the tools were the spammers and the image spams their
implements - but that'd just be semantics :-}
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 04:08:51 -0700, "Loren Wilton"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> marketing.. or should I expect a huge deluge of Image spam this weekend
>
>Maybe. Who knows.
>
>Image
On 2006-07-15 01:21, Gary V wrote:
> Not sure if this still applies, but you have:
>
> /opt/csw/sbin/spamass-milter -p /var/run/spamass.sock -f
>
> According to:
>
http://www.monkey.org/freebsd/archive/freebsd-questions/200411/msg01326.html
>
> "Make sure you are passing spamass-milter the "-u d
marketing.. or should I expect a huge deluge of Image spam this weekend
Maybe. Who knows.
Image spam has been increasing drastically in the last few months. It is
much harder to detect than normal spams, and if spammers weren't so
incompetent in general it would be even harder than it is.
First it was Iron-port , now postini.
http://www.webuser.co.uk/news/88975.html
Is Image spam really that BIG. I am missing something. My image spams
are getting caught by the BL's ( touchwood )
I think these companies are trying to keep up the hype for their own
marketing.. or should I expect a
15 matches
Mail list logo
