Matt Kettler wrote:
In sa 2.6x or older, yes.. in sa 3.0.0 or higher, no.
First, phrases isn't quite accurate.. bayes stores tokens, and most of
the tokens are simply words, not phrases.
In SA 3.0.0 or higher the text tokens themselves are not stored, only
the SHA1 hash of them is stored.
On 7/13/2006 11:06 AM, Ramprasad wrote:
So what is the best way to reduce network traffic. We are already
getting the sbl-xbl lists from spamhaus so as to serve those lists
locally , can I get any other lists locally ? Commercial agreements
also are ok.
Many/most lists will provide rsync ac
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 11:17 -0400, Craig Morrison wrote:
> Ramprasad wrote:
> > Hi,
> > SA works fine , for the quiet large setup that we have. ( we get upto
> > 200k mails an hour at peak times )
> > But I notice it is too network dependent. A little problem with the
> > network and all hell
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > doesn't work the skip it and move on. I get rid of 120,000
> > > spams a day
> > > using that trick.
> >
> > Ooo. Set it to maila.microsoft.com... {evil grin}
>
> Not a good idea, since mai
Jack Gostl wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Steven Stern"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Spamass"
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:31 PM
> Subject: Re: Image only spam
>
>
>> Jack Gostl wrote:
>>> Thanks for the response.
>>>
>>> Take it slow with me, spamassassin has been running
> -Original Message-
> From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:52 AM
> To: Marc Perkel
> Cc: Bart Schaefer; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: The best way to use Spamassassin is to not use
> Spamassassin
>
>
> > doesn't work the skip
Loren Wilton wrote:
If this web form isn't high volume, you could format the form input as a
mail message and pipe it to spamassassin, then check the result.
Also, if the web form is written in Perl, you could access the
SpamAssassin Perl modules directly.
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communic
Hi,
i have an idea to use spamassassin for checking web inputs forms. But i
wanna different spam database from mail spam database on the same
machine. I think that i can send web form to some e-mail address, if
spamassassin say thats ok, send it to another e-mail address and theris
some maildr
Benny Pedersen wrote:
the same was a fault from redhat to say we don't like to support older redhat
relases, since we now need to donwload a iso file again to upgrade what could
have being done from up2date ?
You might find the following useful:
HOWTO: yum upgrade to CentOS 4.0
http://www.cent
It is possible to configure preferences to per-user using
mySQL and the Spamassassin, using the Qmail Toaster ?
I am trying to make this, but I below receive the message from
error:
spamd: service unavailable: Error fetching to user
preferences saw SQL at /usr/bin/spamd line 1684, line 2.
S
i have an idea to use spamassassin for checking web inputs forms. But i
Ok.
wanna different spam database from mail spam database on the same machine.
Ok.
I think that i can send web form to some e-mail address, if spamassassin
say thats ok, send it to another e-mail address and theris som
I am running SpamAssassin 3.1.2 on Windows 2003.
I have had a problem with dnsbl lookups, as even though they complete,
they do not return any results.
It appears that only when i get a dns timeout that any that did complete
and were positive are actually returned and score the email.
I wrote
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 11:21:09AM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> ok -- there's the bug ;) SpamAssassin is misinterpreting your
> MX's Received headers.
[...]
> Could you open a bug on the SpamAssassin bugzilla about that? Attach
> the debug output and sample again (it can be tricky to find posts t
Ramprasad wrote:
Hi,
SA works fine , for the quiet large setup that we have. ( we get upto
200k mails an hour at peak times )
But I notice it is too network dependent. A little problem with the
network and all hell breaks loose. Mailq shoots up and SA starts timing
out.
Probably because I
Ramprasad wrote:
Hi,
SA works fine , for the quiet large setup that we have. ( we get upto
200k mails an hour at peak times )
But I notice it is too network dependent. A little problem with the
network and all hell breaks loose. Mailq shoots up and SA starts timing
out.
Probably because I
Hi,
SA works fine , for the quiet large setup that we have. ( we get upto
200k mails an hour at peak times )
But I notice it is too network dependent. A little problem with the
network and all hell breaks loose. Mailq shoots up and SA starts timing
out.
Probably because I have enabled all ki
On Thursday July 13 2006 9:28 am, Jack Gostl wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steven Stern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Spamass"
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:31 PM
> Subject: Re: Image only spam
>
> > Jack Gostl wrote:
> >> Thanks for the response.
> >>
> >> Take it slow with me
Just d'l the source tar ball and build rpm's from it.
/*rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.3.tar.gz*
/That should produce a binary RPM for you. I have not tested it yet.
Regards
Mick Pollard
__lunix-aus__/
/
Paul Hutchings wrote:
I have a Suse 10.0 system running Spamassassin from the Suse RPMs
Pezhman Lali wrote:
> Hi
> which variables in spamd, contained "from" and "to" of the processed
> mail?
> if nothing,
> how can I add this variables?
Which "from" and "to" are you referring to? The ones in the message
body, or the actual ones from the envelope (ie: RCPT TO: and MAIL FROM
commands
Joshua, C.S. Chen wrote:
> Hello folks,
> My users speak Chinese. I found that spamassassin seems not working well
> about chinese chset (utf8 or big5) on the bayes issue. Many normal mails
> (almost) get BAYES_99 score although the real spam also get BAYES_99. It
> looks like foreign language like
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Depends on what he's doing it might work. I catch most spam based on
> sender behavior rather than message content. For example, anyone can do
> this trick. Set your highest MX record (add a new one) to an IP address
> that doesn't exist. Some spammers
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Stern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spamass"
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: Image only spam
Jack Gostl wrote:
Thanks for the response.
Take it slow with me, spamassassin has been running so well for so long
that I haven't had to
Hi,
i have an idea to use spamassassin for checking web inputs forms. But i
wanna different spam database from mail spam database on the same
machine. I think that i can send web form to some e-mail address, if
spamassassin say thats ok, send it to another e-mail address and theris
some maildr
On Wed, July 12, 2006 11:53, Tom Brown wrote:
>> Im working in rethad 9.0 and try to install spamassassin in a good way
> why redhat 9?
why redhat at all ? :-)
>> How can i fix this problem?
> use a more upto date OS ??
70 million people still use windows 98, now microsoft stops supporting
secu
Hi which variables in spamd, contained "from" and "to" of the processed mail? if nothing, how can I add this variables? Best Pezhman
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.
hi Where is the module of logging in spamd? I want to add $from and $to to logging? which file, and which part must be changed? Best pezhman Lali
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.
Ramprasad wrote:
Spamassassin works pretty great for me, but some spammers keep
upgrading. Some of my clients are still getting stupid spams thru
I think this was discussed before how do I catch spam with mangled urls.
Sorry if this is a repeat
Something like
--
visit
http:
ok -- there's the bug ;) SpamAssassin is misinterpreting your
MX's Received headers.
Received: from vm.vonage.com ([220.166.39.177]) by amsfep14-int.chello.nl
(InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with SMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Justin, everyone,
Justin Mason wrote:
It's worth checking this; that rule should fire only if the
mail really *did* come from Vonage. I suspect a bug in how your
mailserver's Received headers are parsed.
Could you post:
- a sample of a spam that passed this, with all headers
- output
* Marc Perkel wrote (12/07/06 18:30):
Catchy subject line eh?
OK - so what I mean by this is that I now use SA for about 5% of all
incoming email. The reaso of spam is rejected before I get to SA through
a fairly large number of tricks that allow me to determine with near
100% accuracy things
I have a Suse 10.0 system running Spamassassin from the Suse RPMs that
used to be on Carsten Hoegers Suse FTP folder.
They don't appear to be there any more, so I wondered if anyone had any
pointers to compatible RPMs to get me up to 3.1.3?
I know I could uninstall the existing Spamassassin RPMs
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 03:17:05PM +0800, Joshua, C.S. Chen wrote:
> Hello folks,
> My users speak Chinese. I found that spamassassin seems not working well
> about chinese chset (utf8 or big5) on the bayes issue. Many normal mails
> (almost) get BAYES_99 score although the real spam also get BAYES
It's worth checking this; that rule should fire only if the
mail really *did* come from Vonage. I suspect a bug in how your
mailserver's Received headers are parsed.
Could you post:
- a sample of a spam that passed this, with all headers
- output of "spamassassin -D -L -t < spam", the lines
On 7/12/06, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Depends on what he's doing it might work.
He's writing procmail recipes. He's a user on a hosted shell server,
not a sysadmin. Strictly delivery-time header text analysis, no
MTA-level configuration games.
For example, anyone can do this t
Hello,
I have a problem with my trusted network config.
An email with the following header received line
does not work with trusted network.
---
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.romeo.unige.ch by romeo.unige.ch
(PMDF V6.2-1x9 #31144) id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon,
03 Jul 2006 17:10:03 +0200 (MES
Hi everyone,
Paul Boven wrote:
One of my users just spotted a FN that had managed to slip trough.
They're abusing 70_sare_whitelist.cf, specifically:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] vonage.com
# Vonage voice mail notification
I'm now catching these on several m
Hello folks,
My users speak Chinese. I found that spamassassin seems not working well
about chinese chset (utf8 or big5) on the bayes issue. Many normal mails
(almost) get BAYES_99 score although the real spam also get BAYES_99. It
looks like foreign language like Chinese is very easy to be high ba
Hi Michael, everyone,
Michael Parker wrote:
I notice that using sa-learn with SQL now is very slow compared to file db.
Is this normal, and is accessing the db while scanning mail any slower with
SQL?
Yes. Check out the benchmarks here:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesBenchmarkResul
38 matches
Mail list logo
