sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 2709 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 3366 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 184836 0 non-token data: ntokens
0.000 0
We have some good news! All though it has taken some time, our brokers
have found 0 companies that are willing to your home.
Rght - that's SURE to get people to click on their site!
{^_-}
also sprach Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.02.1827 +0200]:
> I run two copies of spamd with different -p port options, and point
> the virtual users' spamc at the port corresponding to the spamd with
> the --virtual-config-dir option.
This isi actually another approach which had crosse
The amusing thing about this is that (a) SORBS doesn't maintain a list
of "members", and (b) the mail server that received this trash has
never to my knowledge used the DUL.
empty-threats
Description: Binary data
For what it's worth, I'm bouncing messages that contain mime gif and jpg
files if no reverse DNS is set. It's getting rid of some of it.
On 7/2/06, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not 100% positive this is even a SA issue but it is driving me up the wall.
Some mailings are having this added right after the
SA report. It usually isn't an issue except that some user fetch their mail
from Exchange and these mailings are show
On 7/2/06, martin f krafft
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On mail systems with virtual and local users, it's not easily
possible to run per-user spamc with user configuration.
I run two copies of spamd with different -p port options, and point
the virtual users' spamc at the port corresponding to t
Hi, the spamc manpage says under option -e
Note that there is a very slight chance mail will be lost here,
because if the fork-and-exec fails there’s no place to put the
mail message.
under what conditions would such a failure occur?
Is it not possible for spamc to await the successful com
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.02.1616 +0200]:
> I suggest that spamd is changed such that it disables virtual-config
> when the user name passed by spamc does not include an @ sign.
Sorry for the afterthought, but if the above is not a good idea,
maybe spamc could get an
On mail systems with virtual and local users, it's not easily
possible to run per-user spamc with user configuration. Either the
spamd process runs with --virtual-config, then local users need to
have directories under the virtual mailbox base directory, or you
run spamd without --virtual-confi
> #custom rules
> body CSTM_INFINEX_VEN /infinex/
> describe CSTM_INFINEX_VEN Message mentions Infinex Ventures
> score CSTM_INFINEX_VEN 2.0
s/b ok
> body CSTM_FONT_SIZE_EQLS_2 //
> describe CSTM_FONT_SIZE_EQLS_2 Message contains html for small fonts
> score CSTM_FONT_SIZE_EQLS_2 .1
won't work -
Hello Friends !
I have been running SA for years with mailscanner and some virus
scanning software on our mail linux fedora server. This server now
runs FC5 and I found out some two weeks ago that bayes database was
somehow corrupted so I did go for
fresh mysql bayes database and learned s
I have a similar little question...
How'd these stats get generated:
> After 6 month's I'm at
>
> 0.000 01258041 0 non-token data: nspam
> 0.000 0 996687 0 non-token data: nham
I'd like to know what mine is at... I've got the sa-stats (and a modifie
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow wrote:
They are sending spam bounce messages based on spamassassin testing
this list.
===8<---
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes
>The idea of this is to improve the blacklisting be creating lists to
>reduce false positives. For example, spamcop has a problem were they
>sometimes block earthlink and google servers because those servers send
>some spam.
jdow wrote:
Is there a local workaholics annonymous branch near you?
Oh I'm sure not to be anonymous about it. I guess one upside to
insomnia is that I don't spend time working that could be better spent
sleeping.
jdow wrote:
They are sending spam bounce messages based on spamassassin testing
this list.
===8<---
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address
17 matches
Mail list logo
