Re: SA tags above header info

2006-06-16 Thread Mark Martinec
On Friday June 16 2006 20:33, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > Is there anything in RFC-2822 (or other RFC) that says that an MTA can't > take those X-Spam headers that SpamAssassin so nicely put at the top of > the message and move them to the bottom? Our MTA moves these headers > and some others and

RE: SA tags above header info

2006-06-16 Thread Rosenbaum, Larry M.
Is there anything in RFC-2822 (or other RFC) that says that an MTA can't take those X-Spam headers that SpamAssassin so nicely put at the top of the message and move them to the bottom? Our MTA moves these headers and some others and I'm wondering if we have any basis for griping about it. It see

Here's a considerate spammer....

2006-06-16 Thread Andy Jezierski
yoursite MailScanner in /var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20060616 (message k5GHwGGK023094). -- Postmaster MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

Re: SpamAssassin Question

2006-06-16 Thread Michele Neylon :: Blacknight.ie
slyandjen wrote: > If SpamAssasin is enable > > does it ignore the whitelist/blacklist settings in MailScanner? > > if it does > > where is the whitelist/Blacklist settings That's a MailScanner specific question, so you should really try posting about it on the MailScanner lists -- Mr Mich

SpamAssassin Question

2006-06-16 Thread slyandjen
If SpamAssasin is enable does it ignore the whitelist/blacklist settings in MailScanner? if it does where is the whitelist/Blacklist settings -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-Question-t1799848.html#a4905321 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.c

spamassassin AWL Db

2006-06-16 Thread John Goubeaux
Folks, I am running SpamAssassin version 2.64 on a production system using a "site wide configuration" , ie no per user settings. My AWL db file has gotten quite large (500+MB)and while I am not seeing any performance issues, **yet that are necessarily related to this, I was wondering about

Re: content is being striped

2006-06-16 Thread Jim Maul
Michael Di Martino wrote: jdow wrote: It isn't SpamAssassin doing this. It may be a misconfigured procmail rule. I presume it could also be a misconfigured rule from any OTHER means of tossing mail into your mailbox. But it is NOT SpamAssassin doing it. {^_^} - Original Message - Fr

RE: content is being striped

2006-06-16 Thread Michael Di Martino
jdow wrote: > It isn't SpamAssassin doing this. It may be a misconfigured procmail > rule. I presume it could also be a misconfigured rule from any OTHER > means of tossing mail into your mailbox. But it is NOT SpamAssassin > doing it. > > {^_^} > - Original Message - > From: "Michael D

Re: content is being striped

2006-06-16 Thread jdow
It isn't SpamAssassin doing this. It may be a misconfigured procmail rule. I presume it could also be a misconfigured rule from any OTHER means of tossing mail into your mailbox. But it is NOT SpamAssassin doing it. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Michael Di Martino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Was "One large image" now is "several small images"

2006-06-16 Thread jdow
From: "John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Matt wrote: It seems the spammers have gotten smart to the fact that we were filtering for one large image and no text... now what I am seeing is that the spammers are sending many small images inline with the e-mails! But, I hav