From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 5/20/2006 11:44 PM, WFGB Team wrote:
[My Replies]
A) Since I am unsure what MSA is I did some checking up. How do I know
if I am set up for MSA?
I am using Smartermail. I am equally unsure of what MTA is. I know
what the MX Records are sor
On 5/21/2006 12:30 AM, spectacularstuff wrote:
Hi Daryl,
I put the trusted networks in and that seem to get rid of a few things but
now it brought out 4 or 5 others... lol
I understand what the following is. I just don't know how to fix it. Do
you know how to fix this issue?
3.2 NO_DNS_FOR_F
Hi Daryl,
I put the trusted networks in and that seem to get rid of a few things but
now it brought out 4 or 5 others... lol
I understand what the following is. I just don't know how to fix it. Do
you know how to fix this issue?
3.2 NO_DNS_FOR_FROMDNS: Envelope sender has no MX or A D
Thanks Daryle, I just read your replies That makes sense. I will have
to read up on a few things...
1st: What auth tokens are.
2nd: Whether Smartmail can allow those and the RFC number you mentioend
3rd: how to set SA to utilize those.
Thanks again.
Wayne
--
View this message in context:
Okay
Please forgive my ignorance here as I am attempting to absorb and understand
all of this.
I am presuming the meaning of dialup here is not the same as a dialup ISP
such as Juno or Netzero, etc etc etc. because all of our people on the
server are on high-speed internet and not dialup acco
On 5/20/2006 11:44 PM, WFGB Team wrote:
[My Replies]
A) Since I am unsure what MSA is I did some checking up. How do I know
if I am set up for MSA?
I am using Smartermail. I am equally unsure of what MTA is. I know
what the MX Records are sort of.
Looking at the headers of the email you s
Hi Daryl,
Thank you for the response however what you are talking about is a little over where I am at.
]]
A) This happens when you're using the same SMTP service for both MSA and
MTA/MX functions and don't take measures to notify SpamA
Pablo Allietti wrote:
> hi all, i have spamassassin for freebsd running in my system and i want
> to modify a score but i dont have a 50_score
>
Note: When changing rule scores do not edit 50_scores.cf. Add a score
statement to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. 50_scores.cf, along with
all the o
On 5/20/2006 1:47 AM, spectacularstuff wrote:
I have just set up Spam Assassin on our server.
It is working very nicely however whenever we try to send an email from our
own server to someone else on the same server, it gets picked up as spam.
This happens when you're using the same SMTP servic
The messages getting tagged most positively are on a segment of addresses
that are tagged as dynamically assigned addresses, colloquially called
dialup addresses in the anti-spam community. That is what these mean:
RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
This is good for several points on any spam c
If people are seeing false positives on legitimate mail from Hotmail
open a bug and *attach* un-altered, un-munged, sample emails to the bug.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/
On 5/20/2006 7:22 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
FYI.
It happened to me today as well. I lost an email for a custo
FYI.
It happened to me today as well. I lost an email for a customer.
On May 17, 2006, at 4:50 AM, Dhawal Doshy wrote:
Running SA 3.1.1 on centos 4.3 with original rules (no sa-update)..
The mail is genuine ham. Are more details required??
Received: from bay0-omc1-s5.bay0.hotmail.com (unkno
Heute (20.05.2006/23:53 Uhr) schrieb Pablo Allietti,
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:54:13PM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
>> Heute (20.05.2006/22:47 Uhr) schrieb Pablo Allietti,
>>
> perfect.
> exist any way to do that for all users??? because i do that for me only.
sorry, I don`t know. I have a syst
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:54:13PM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
> Heute (20.05.2006/22:47 Uhr) schrieb Pablo Allietti,
>
perfect.
exist any way to do that for all users??? because i do that for me only.
> > On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:23:04PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> >> Saturday 20 May 2006
Heute (20.05.2006/22:47 Uhr) schrieb Pablo Allietti,
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:23:04PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
>> Saturday 20 May 2006 21:54 skrev Pablo Allietti:
>> > hi all, i have spamassassin for freebsd running in my system and i want
>> > to modify a score but i dont have a 50_score
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 03:51:09PM -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
> Pablo Allietti wrote:
> > On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:23:04PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> >> Saturday 20 May 2006 21:54 skrev Pablo Allietti:
> >>> hi all, i have spamassassin for freebsd running in my system and i want
> >>> to mod
Pablo Allietti wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:23:04PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
>> Saturday 20 May 2006 21:54 skrev Pablo Allietti:
>>> hi all, i have spamassassin for freebsd running in my system and i want
>>> to modify a score but i dont have a 50_score
>>> How i modify this score?
>>>
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:23:04PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Saturday 20 May 2006 21:54 skrev Pablo Allietti:
> > hi all, i have spamassassin for freebsd running in my system and i want
> > to modify a score but i dont have a 50_score
> > How i modify this score?
> >
> > 7.5 AWL
Saturday 20 May 2006 21:54 skrev Pablo Allietti:
> hi all, i have spamassassin for freebsd running in my system and i want
> to modify a score but i dont have a 50_score
> How i modify this score?
>
> 7.5 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
AWL is not a normal rule.
Hello,
I started piping my mail through SA a couple of months ago and I've
been diligently marking messages as spam for the bayes subsystem. Then I
noticed that neither the headers of messages nor the analysis reports
have anything about bayes rules.
I'm running exim and here's what I have in t
hi all, i have spamassassin for freebsd running in my system and i want
to modify a score but i dont have a 50_score
How i modify this score?
7.5 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
--
thanks
On Thursday 18 May 2006 22:50, Matt Kettler wrote:
> David Baron wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:40, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >> David Baron wrote:
> >>> May 18 11:50:22 d_baron spamc[5797]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at
> >>> 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#1 of 3): Connection refused
> >>>
> >>> S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tracey Gates wrote:
> I apologize if this has already been addressed.I am using CGPro with
> CGPSA. I have placed an entry in my local.cf
>
[snip]
In addition to other comments in this thread, Given:
>
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 02:19, jdow wrote:
> (It would be a real serious gas to hook a 419 phish to Eliza and
> watch for the results. Generate a somewhat paranoid Eliza then sit
> back and party. Of course, if *I* could think of this extension of
> the "lead them on" counter phish then I am sure som
Thank you for all of the suggestions and comments.
[
A) But probably your server failed to indicate in its received headers that the mail from the dynamic IP was authenticated, or SA failed to parse the received header
B) Don't use a dial-up and sen
"Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote on Sat, 20 May 2006 12:58:15 +0200:
>
>> Have you considered using "spamassassin -r" to report the spam to:
>
> Well, he says that at least one of his "feeds" isn't 100% spam. So I very
> much hope if he starts doing this that
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote on Sat, 20 May 2006 12:58:15 +0200:
Have you considered using "spamassassin -r" to report the spam to:
Well, he says that at least one of his "feeds" isn't 100% spam. So I very
much hope if he starts doing this that he cle
spectacularstuff wrote:
I have just set up Spam Assassin on our server.
It is working very nicely however whenever we try to send an email from our
own server to someone else on the same server, it gets picked up as spam.
I am wondering if anyone here has experience with Spam Assassin and can he
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote on Sat, 20 May 2006 12:58:15 +0200:
> Have you considered using "spamassassin -r" to report the spam to:
Well, he says that at least one of his "feeds" isn't 100% spam. So I very
much hope if he starts doing this that he cleans that feed to 100% ;-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl
Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm now capturing 2 separate spam feeds and I want to share it with
> anyone who can use it. I'll forward it to you in real time.
>
> First - the spambot feed. This is spam that is mostly spambot
> generated targeted at email addresses that never existed.
I'd like to inform you that my GERMAN ruleset has seen updates. It's
available via RulesDuJour as ruleset ZMI_GERMAN, or directly from
http://zmi.at/x/70_zmi_german.cf
I always update after new rules are applied, so the use of RulesDuJour
is greatly suggested. Updates occur when needed, sometimes
Don't use a dialup and send direct?
{o.o}
- Original Message -
From: "spectacularstuff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 22:47
Subject: Spam Assassin Detecting our emails as spam
I have just set up Spam Assassin on our server.
It is working very nicely however when
32 matches
Mail list logo
