On 5/10/2006 3:13 PM, David Baron wrote:
2. Fails after several time outs with:
http: request failed: 500 read timeout: 500 read timeout
error: no mirror data available for channel updates.spamassassin.org
channel: MIRRORED.BY contents were missing, channel failed
This can occur if you've got
I ran sendmail for a dozen years.
I finally took the plunge and switched to Postfix. I will not go back.
I am running Postfix - amavisd-new w/ clamav and spamassassin on a Linux
box. I used to run Solaris.. I am not 100% sure, but I cannot think why
the Postfix combo wouldn't run on Solari
Chris Edwards wrote:
> Hola,
>
> I have spent two days trying to figure out how to get the following to
> work. I have set up Spamassassin and ClamAV, I am running sendmail on
> the Solaris 10 platform. I would like to be able to scan for all spam
> and virus (in, out and relayed email). Can so
"jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/05/2006 06:52:06 AM:
> From: "Chris Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hola,
>
> I have spent two days trying to figure out how to get the following to
> work. I have set up Spamassassin and ClamAV, I am running sendmail on
> the Solaris 10 platform. I would
First, I know it's widely known that Pyzor "doesn't work on Windows".
But, you've probably seen enough of my postings to know I'm not always
satisfied with that reponse. So... I put a little effort into it this
week and it does work on Windows if you run SA from the command line,
but not if you use
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> OK, learning is quick anyway, so no problem here. The expire will
> definitely run much longer, as you say. But what happens when SA wants
> to auto-learn another message while expire runs? Will it wait and
> timeout or just skip autolearning? Skipping would be no probl
Thanks for getting back to me so quickly...
You're right about me not showing stuff coming in from the outside
world The previous build of the server, MailScanner,
SpamAssassin did have some, but I lost them when I neuked the
server. I'll get the server in live again to see what h
Could somebody please remote that guy from the list?
mfg zmi
-- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery Subsystem: --
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
Date: Freitag, 12. Mai 2006 00:40
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The or
Jerome Delamarche wrote:
Hi,
I'm configuring SA and I'm looking for an easy way for the end users to
improve their own Bayesian filters.
Users do not have interactive account on the Linux servers. They cannot use
"sa-learn" or any other Linux tools.
It could be fine if they could automatically
Jerome Delamarche wrote:
Hi,
I'm configuring SA and I'm looking for an easy way for the end users to
improve their own Bayesian filters.
Users do not have interactive account on the Linux servers. They cannot use
"sa-learn" or any other Linux tools.
It could be fine if they could automatically
Hi,
I'm configuring SA and I'm looking for an easy way for the end users to
improve their own Bayesian filters.
Users do not have interactive account on the Linux servers. They cannot use
"sa-learn" or any other Linux tools.
It could be fine if they could automatically resend to their own mailbox
On Donnerstag, 11. Mai 2006 22:22 Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> It depends what "timeout" means in this context. What's going on is
> that anytime a process needs to get a write lock on the db, there's
> contention if other processes already have it locked. By default,
> processes can wait either 300s
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:10:39PM +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> OK, learning is quick anyway, so no problem here. The expire will
> definitely run much longer, as you say. But what happens when SA wants
> to auto-learn another message while expire runs? Will it wait and
> timeout or just ski
On Donnerstag, 11. Mai 2006 20:06 Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesForceExpire is says you
> > should stop SA before --force-expire, is that a must or a
> > recommendation? The man page doesn't ask for it.
>
> It's completely unnecessary to stop SA (that'd be a
On Donnerstag, 11. Mai 2006 20:00 Matt Kettler wrote:
> First, adding --sync is redundant. --force-expire implies --sync
> because it would be foolish for SA to attempt expiry without syncing
> first.
I found that in the documentation after I sent the mail.
> Your expiry will take much longer. On
At 12:04 PM 05/10/2006, you wrote:
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>
> spamd -m
>
> and what would be an ideal number to set it ?
>
> I came in this morning , got a bunch of those swap message , and
my VM is at
> 86% right now
As Chris S already said, there's no hard-fast rule here. However,
here
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 06:17:14PM +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> > > bayes: synced databases from journal in 11 seconds: 1968 unique
> > > entries (3059 total entries)
> > That's the journal sync, not the expiry part. The expiry part takes
> > much longer.
>
> It comes from "sa-learn --force-ex
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 11. Mai 2006 08:06 Matt Kettler wrote:
>>> And tonights expiry for server #1:
>>> bayes: synced databases from journal in 11 seconds: 1968 unique
>>> entries (3059 total entries)
>> That's the journal sync, not the expiry part. The expiry part takes
>> much
Hi Daryl!
> Since those headers are munged pretty badly, I'll have to just say you
> probably need to manually configure your trusted_networks.
>
> Does "mail.gmx.net" eq "mail.external-domain.com"?
Yes, mail.gmx.net is the same as mail.external-domain.com.
I changed the names of the users and s
Hello Michael,
Wednesday, May 10, 2006, 5:21:14 PM, you wrote:
> And why was SARE_FORGED_EBAY set down to 4? It was so nice at 100+...
Originally it was set to 104 to over-ride user driven whitelists, but
I felt that was somewhat out of standard practices to have a single
rule flag a message as
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:47:15PM +0200, Keith Dunnett wrote:
> I've recently had a couple of false positives caused by this rule, and think
> it may be scored too highly for a single check. The e-mails in question were
> in Spanish, and the Spanish word for linguistics has two accented characters
I've recently had a couple of false positives caused by this rule, and think
it may be scored too highly for a single check. The e-mails in question were
in Spanish, and the Spanish word for linguistics has two accented characters
which is enough to trigger this rule.
Admittedly, the blacklists a
Christian Reiter wrote:
Hi!
I have a problem with my Spamassassin 3.1.1 installation here.
I have Postfix as MTA and Amavids-new 2.3.3
The Rule RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL matches also the first hop of the
received Headers. If i understand correctly the first hop should
not be matched as a user could u
The Help Guy wrote:
hello all:
You've been very helpful in the past, so let me say thank you to start.
Im currently using SA 3.1.0 on Linux with procmail.
I have a problem that is pretty much exactly described in this bug report:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4410
Afte
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Thomas Gross wrote:
Hi List!
I'm runing a debian mailserver with qmail 1.03, vpopmail and kaspersky
anti-virus smtp-scanner 5.5.3.
Now i wanted to add the latest spamassassin to filter the spam which
grows
up to 500 mails per day.
I searched the whole intern
On Donnerstag, 11. Mai 2006 08:06 Matt Kettler wrote:
> > And tonights expiry for server #1:
> > bayes: synced databases from journal in 11 seconds: 1968 unique
> > entries (3059 total entries)
> That's the journal sync, not the expiry part. The expiry part takes
> much longer.
It comes from "sa-l
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:57:44PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> The updates site has had to be taken down temporarily, due
> to hardware issues at the ASF :( Give it a day or two.
Unless something else happened with that machine that I don't know about,
the updates site hasn't been down (httpd wa
hello all:
You've been very helpful in the past, so let me say thank you to start.
Im currently using SA 3.1.0 on Linux with procmail.
I have a problem that is pretty much exactly described in this bug report:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4410
After a period of heavy sp
> David Baron wrote:
> > 1. Depends on some PERL packages: libarchive-tar-perl, libio-zlib-perl.
> > Debian
>
> also should depend on libwww-perl
>
> Did you file a bug report?
No, I did not. If Debian maintainers are responsible for this, I will. Easy
enough. Poster says that this is no longer a
The updates site has had to be taken down temporarily, due
to hardware issues at the ASF :( Give it a day or two.
--j.
David Baron writes:
> On Wednesday 10 May 2006 23:04, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > David Baron wrote:
> > > 1. Depends on some PERL packages: libarchive-tar-perl, libio-zlib-perl.
>
Philip Mak wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:47:40PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > Philip Mak wrote:
> > > Why does ALL_TRUSTED have a score of -3.3? Doesn't this mean that
> > > any spammer who connects directly to my mail server has a good
> > > chance of getting past SpamAssassin?
> >
> > Th
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 23:04, Matt Kettler wrote:
> David Baron wrote:
> > 1. Depends on some PERL packages: libarchive-tar-perl, libio-zlib-perl.
> > Debian packages did not enforce this dependency. I installed them
> > manually.
> >
> > 2. Fails after several time outs with:
> > http: request f
Hi,
Michael Monnerie schrieb:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BetterDocumentation/SqlReadmeBayes
I guess somebody made a mistake on that page, some content is there
twice, and possible something overwritten.
mfg zmi
I have tested it. I've no problem with the wiki (browser: Mozilla
Fir
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BetterDocumentation/SqlReadmeBayes
I guess somebody made a mistake on that page, some content is there
twice, and possible something overwritten.
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660/4156531
Hi!
I have a problem with my Spamassassin 3.1.1 installation here.
I have Postfix as MTA and Amavids-new 2.3.3
The Rule RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL matches also the first hop of the
received Headers. If i understand correctly the first hop should
not be matched as a user could use a dynamic/dialup IP-Addr
From: "David Minard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
G'day All,
I'm hoping for enlightenment with a peculiar problem I'm having with
SpamAssassin 3.1.1, on a fresh install of Fedora Core 4, fully
patched. I'm using sendmail and the latest MailScanner.
I'm having trouble with SpamAssassin. When I fi
G'day All,
I'm hoping for enlightenment with a peculiar problem I'm having with
SpamAssassin 3.1.1, on a fresh install of Fedora Core 4, fully
patched. I'm using sendmail and the latest MailScanner.
I'm having trouble with SpamAssassin. When I first install it and
test it, things seem
37 matches
Mail list logo
