Jim Smith wrote:
> I have been using an email address for all maillists that I subscribe to
> that doesn't get filtered by SA. Since subscribing to this list, it is now
> being pounded with spam (gee, who'd guess that a SA list would be harvested
> and pounded by spammers ). Anyway, I'm going to ch
From: "Jim Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have been using an email address for all maillists that I subscribe to
that doesn't get filtered by SA. Since subscribing to this list, it is now
being pounded with spam (gee, who'd guess that a SA list would be harvested
and pounded by spammers ). Anyway,
I have been using an email address for all maillists that I subscribe to
that doesn't get filtered by SA. Since subscribing to this list, it is now
being pounded with spam (gee, who'd guess that a SA list would be harvested
and pounded by spammers ). Anyway, I'm going to change email addresses
and
jdow wrote:
You mean you actually found a REAL .info site!! Wow! Good digging!
how about www.mailscanner.info.
This one even gets inserted in mail scanned by mailscanner, which will
cause that mail to be caught by other SA installations:)
LDB wrote:
I am invoking spamc through a filter script where spamd is listening.
Also, I am using PostFix as the MTA. My platform is Debian Linux. I am
SA version 3.0.3.
The below config. captures about 1700 spams a day but it is NOT enough.
- Add some SARE rules.
- enable URIBL
- add uribl r
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 09:41:51PM -0700, Dan Patnode wrote:
> But doesn't 2 or more need a coma, as in?:
> body DRUGS_SMEAR1/(?:Viagra|Valium|Xanax|Soma|Cialis){2,}/i
If you want to include the "or more" part, yes. However, "{2}" just means
"2", will include the set of things that
