Studying options for "or more", I've found this example from 20_drugs.cf: body DRUGS_SMEAR1 /(?:Viagra|Valium|Xanax|Soma|Cialis){2}/i describe DRUGS_SMEAR1 Two or more drugs crammed together into one wordBut doesn't 2 or more need a coma, as in?: body DRUGS_SMEAR1 /(?:Viagra|Valium|Xanax|Soma|Cia
On Friday 05 May 2006 17:41, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> You could also use Thunderbird as a news reader only (no e-mail), and
>> post using the GMane portal. Perhaps your Outlook version even
>> supports NNTP. It would be a very strange piece of software if it
>> doesn't support threading and referenci
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
to /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001001/
Absolutely not, the rules are used automatically! See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates for more info.
They are used automatically by the "spamassassin" and "spamd" scripts, yes.
They are not used automatically by sof
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 06:03:53PM +0100, Benedict White wrote:
> A spamassassin upgrade seems to have broken razor and DCC
It's in the UPGRADE doc. You have to enable the plugins because they were
disabled by default due to licensing issues.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Too late, Pandora; th
Benedict White wrote:
> I am am using Spamassassin 3.1.1 with postfix 2.2.9 and Amavisd-new
> 2.4.1-rc1
>
> A spamassassin upgrade seems to have broken razor and DCC
>
> This is what I get (selected bits) from a spamd --lint
>
> [11299] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: razor_config
I am am using Spamassassin 3.1.1 with postfix 2.2.9 and Amavisd-new 2.4.1-rc1
A spamassassin upgrade seems to have broken razor and DCC
This is what I get (selected bits) from a spamd --lint
[11299] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: razor_config
/etc/mail/spamassassin/.razor/razor-a
Wiebe Cazemier wrote:
> On Friday 05 May 2006 14:50, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, I'm stuck using this at the office in order to work
> > with the Exchange server. I prefer Thunderbird and I would use it,
> > but that only gives me email (via IMAP). Anyone know of anything
> > beside
On Friday 05 May 2006 14:50, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Unfortunately, I'm stuck using this at the office in order to work
> with the Exchange server. I prefer Thunderbird and I would use it,
> but that only gives me email (via IMAP). Anyone know of anything
> besides Outlook that can interface with
LDB wrote:
> I am invoking spamc through a filter script where spamd is
> listening. Also, I am using PostFix as the MTA. My platform is
> Debian Linux. I am SA version 3.0.3.
>
> The below config. captures about 1700 spams a day but it is NOT
> enough.
>
> Can anyone kindly suggest a better m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Evolution works with Exchange, there is a plugin for it.. It can
> access calendar, contacts, and email. I have it on my Linspire
> workstation - who needs windows... :)
Nice try. :)
I've looked at Evolution, and I'd like to try it, but I'm stuck with
Windows for t
Evolution works with Exchange, there is a plugin for it.. It can access
calendar, contacts, and email. I have it on my Linspire workstation - who
needs windows... :)
> Wiebe Cazemier wrote:
>> On Thursday 04 May 2006 22:49, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>
>> > Yea, I'm using an old version of Outlook whi
Wiebe Cazemier wrote:
> On Thursday 04 May 2006 22:49, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> > Yea, I'm using an old version of Outlook which doesn't support
> > threading.
>
> You would do your fellow list-subscribers a huge favor if you'd use a
> client which does. It's very hard to keep track of convsations
Friday 05 May 2006 12:50 skrev jdow:
> It sounds like he got suckered with the .info site. It seems like all the
> spammers in the known universe dove into that one wholesale.
.biz has to be one tad worse, right? I even know someone with a .info domain,
although she only appears to use it for mai
On Thursday 04 May 2006 22:49, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Yea, I'm using an old version of Outlook which doesn't support
> threading.
You would do your fellow list-subscribers a huge favor if you'd use a client
which does. It's very hard to keep track of convsations this way. If you can't
find a prope
It sounds like he got suckered with the .info site. It seems like all the
spammers in the known universe dove into that one wholesale.
{o.o}
- Original Message -
From: "Wiebe Cazemier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Friday 05 May 2006 00:29, jdow wrote:
You mean you actually found a REAL .i
On Friday 05 May 2006 02:05, Loren Wilton wrote:
> Essentially ALL spam rules "can" misfire on legit mail. In fact
> statistically most of them WILL misfire on some small percentage of legit
> mail. If they are tested and scored reasonably then there should be a
> fairly small chance of legit ma
On Friday 05 May 2006 00:29, jdow wrote:
> You mean you actually found a REAL .info site!! Wow! Good digging!
>
> {^_^}
Well, it's not "real" site. I just got into discussion about Settlers 2 with
somebody, and he pointed me to his (personal) forum. It is not "real" as in
that there are hardl
17 matches
Mail list logo
