Nevermind, I found the entry:
use_dcc { 0 | 1 } (default: 1)
Whether to use DCC, if it is available.
dcc_timeout n (default: 10)
How many seconds you wait for dcc to complete before you go on
without the results.
dcc_body_max NUMBER
dcc_fuz1_max NUMBER
dcc_fuz2_max NUMBER
DCC (Distributed C
All that said, I can't see why you'd want to do anything else with
DCC.
The FP rate on DCC, even with the defaults of |99 for fuzz counts,
is significant. In the SA 3.1.0 set3 mass-checks, DCC_CHECK had a S/O
of| 0.979, meaning that 2.1% of email matched by it was nonspam.
So more detail i
Dan wrote:
>>> 1) Is capturing header output text the best way to implement DCC in SA?
>>
>> No, using the DCC plugin that already comes with SA is the best way.
>>
>> Edit your v310.pre and load the dcc plugin. SA already has pre-scored
>> and tested rules built in. No further work needed.
>
> Exc
1) Is capturing header output text the best way to implement DCC
in SA?
No, using the DCC plugin that already comes with SA is the best way.
Edit your v310.pre and load the dcc plugin. SA already has pre-scored
and tested rules built in. No further work needed.
Excellent Matt. Is there a wa
"Review your spam bucket, compadre."
{o.o}
- Original Message -
From: "Igor Chudov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spamassassin Mailing List"
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 20:21
Subject: intercource oriented newsgroups
A few of my clients are moderated newsgroups that have graphic posts
des
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Chudov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 22:22
> To: Spamassassin Mailing List
> Subject: intercource oriented newsgroups
>
> A few of my clients are moderated newsgroups that have
> graphic posts describing certain sexual perversi
A few of my clients are moderated newsgroups that have graphic posts
describing certain sexual perversions. They receive posts via email
and approve/reject them.
Their posts trip spamassassin sometimes, understandably, they talk
about big reproducting o rgans, arouzal, etc.
So... What can I do,
Matt Kettler wrote:
> 1) Is capturing header output text the best way to implement DCC in SA?
>
>
> No, using the DCC plugin that already comes with SA is the best way.
>
> Edit your v310.pre and load the dcc plugin. SA already has pre-scored
> and tested rules built in. No further work needed.
Dan wrote:
> This is partly about DCC and partly about regex (yes, I've ordered two
> more regex books).
>
>
> First, there's the basic all or nothing output:
>
> X-DCC-servers-Metrics: ui1 1049; bulk Body=many Fuz1=many Fuz2=many
> X-DCC-servers-Metrics: ui1 1049; bulk Body=0 Fuz1=0 Fuz2=0
>
> .
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow wrote:
And it is scored LESS than BAYES_95 by default. That's a clear signal
that the theory behind the scoring system is a little skewed and needs
some rethinking.
No.. It does not mean there's a problem with the scoring system. It
means you're t
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow wrote:
And it is scored LESS than BAYES_95 by default. That's a clear signal
that the theory behind the scoring system is a little skewed and needs
some rethinking.
No.. It does not mean there's a problem with the scoring system. It
means you're t
Michael Parker wrote:
On a stable system with working backup routines running SQLite with
'PRAGMA SYNCHRONOUS=OFF' for bayes makes a lot of sense.
It has been awhile, but I believe you just need to do this at create
time, so you'd only need a proper .sql file that did it.
I think that might
This is partly about DCC and partly about regex (yes, I've ordered two more regex books). First, there's the basic all or nothing output: X-DCC-servers-Metrics: ui1 1049; bulk Body=many Fuz1=many Fuz2=many X-DCC-servers-Metrics: ui1 1049; bulk Body=0 Fuz1=0 Fuz2=0...that can be captured with basic
jdow wrote:
> And it is scored LESS than BAYES_95 by default. That's a clear signal
> that the theory behind the scoring system is a little skewed and needs
> some rethinking.
No.. It does not mean there's a problem with the scoring system. It
means you're trying to apply a simple linear model to
Here is a piece of mail that gets classified as spam,
although it should not.
I have replaced a few email addresses by fake ones, they dont contribute to the
problem.
So what happens: a mail is sent via an authenticated session, to a qmail /
qmail-scanner
setup running at mydomain.de
Here qmail
What about using the SA 'test rule' mechanism?
(IE use "T_testA1" rather than "__testA1").
Effectivly the micro weighting done automagically and in a
standardized way.
Nice, micro weighting without the required score lines. Now I just
need to ignore or absorb the extra scores.
Dan
16 matches
Mail list logo
