Paul Wetter wrote:
Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in
operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to
my next question.
I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be
working. If I do a manual check (with the
I am using Freebsd 5.4 with Mailscanner-4.52.2-1. I have always encountered
this when bayes approaches nspam of arounf 2500. It just locks.
I have had this problem on numerous occassions. My bayes database will not
learn anymore than 2165 nspam. It seems to be stuck there. My tokens increase,
b
From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pablo Allietti wrote:
hi all i recently install spamassassin in freebsd but i can't find
the file that contain the scores i need to chage for example
NO_RDNS rule to give 3.0 but i can't find the file
0.5 NO_RDNSSending MTA has no rever
From: "Pablo Allietti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hi all i recently install spamassassin in freebsd but i can't find the
file that contain the scores i need to chage for example NO_RDNS rule to
give 3.0 but i can't find the file
0.5 NO_RDNSSending MTA has no reverse DNS (Postfix
varia
Al Danks wrote:
> Matt Kettler evi-inc.com> writes:
>
>
>
>> Try a rule something like this:
>>
>> L_FROM_STRING header From =~ /$string/
>>
>>
>>
>
> It appears that the rule is also hitting senders with the string following a .
>
> I.e. From =~ /$com/ hits
>
> comalksdfl.net
>
> aksaf
I guess I'll ask this question and then run like heck
Any educated guesses on when 3.1.2 will be released?
From a selfish point of view, I'm trying to kill several upgrades with
one stone.
Thanks!
Joe
Matt Kettler evi-inc.com> writes:
> Try a rule something like this:
>
> L_FROM_STRING header From =~ /$string/
>
>
It appears that the rule is also hitting senders with the string following a .
I.e. From =~ /$com/ hits
comalksdfl.net
aksafjdla.com
Al
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>> We have received a large quantity of spam that is nothing but a large
>> image. Spamassassin is tagging it a little because it is an image,
>> and only an image, however I'm wondering how other people are
>> handeling this t
Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> We have received a large quantity of spam that is nothing but a large
> image. Spamassassin is tagging it a little because it is an image,
> and only an image, however I'm wondering how other people are
> handeling this type of spam?I don't want to sco
Gaute Lund wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 8:51 PM
>>
>> Unfortunately this is what I may be forced to do. I hate to
>> let one item give a high score, but when the message is
>> nothing but an IMAGE... no HTML... n
Al Danks wrote:
> We are getting a lot of spam where the sender domain name changes, but the
> sender always starts with a specific string.
>
> We've only done a little bit of custom rule writing. How do we do a rule to
> get
> the sender starting with a specific string?
Try a rule something lik
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 26. April 2006 16:09 Pablo Allietti wrote:
>> i need to chage for example NO_RDNS rule to
>> give 3.0
>
> Don't do that, it's not required for a mail server to have an RDNS. At
> least, it used to be the last time I looked into the RFCs.
Technically, it's
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 8:51 PM
>
> Unfortunately this is what I may be forced to do. I hate to
> let one item give a high score, but when the message is
> nothing but an IMAGE... no HTML... no link... and the
> blac
We are getting a lot of spam where the sender domain name changes, but the
sender always starts with a specific string.
We've only done a little bit of custom rule writing. How do we do a rule
to get
the sender starting with a specific string?
You could probably just do something like this:
We are getting a lot of spam where the sender domain name changes, but the
sender always starts with a specific string.
We've only done a little bit of custom rule writing. How do we do a rule to get
the sender starting with a specific string?
Thanks, Al
On Mittwoch, 26. April 2006 16:09 Pablo Allietti wrote:
> i need to chage for example NO_RDNS rule to
> give 3.0
Don't do that, it's not required for a mail server to have an RDNS. At
least, it used to be the last time I looked into the RFCs.
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc-
On 4/26/06, Rosenbaum, Larry M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ...
> > (Someone remind me why the spamd option to disable the auto-whitelist
> > was dropped?)
>
> It hasn't been dropped; they just moved the documentation into
> Plugin/AWL.pm.
Ah,
Tracey Gates wrote:
> OK. Now I understand the high (actually negative) score but what about
> the version difference? Anyone have any idea about that issue?
Possible double-install. One in /usr/ and one in /usr/local?
> From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ...
> (Someone remind me why the spamd option to disable the auto-whitelist
> was dropped? I could instead "chmod 0" the auto-whitelist file, I
> suppose, but then the maillog is cluttered with extra warning output,
> and it's still not scalable.)
OK. Now I understand the high (actually negative) score but what about
the version difference? Anyone have any idea about that issue?
Tracey Gates
Lead Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1350 South Boulder, Third Floor / Tulsa, OK 74119-3203
Phone 918-663-0991 / Fax 918-663-0840
This communication
Pablo Allietti wrote:
>
> ok and i need to restart spamass after modify the local.cf?
Yes.
--
Bowie
DOH! Thanks Dale for pointing that out. Of course I didn't see the
negative sign.
Tracey Gates
Lead Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1350 South Boulder, Third Floor / Tulsa, OK 74119-3203
Phone 918-663-0991 / Fax 918-663-0840
This communication is intended only for the recipient(s) named above;
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:20:22AM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Pablo Allietti wrote:
> > hi all i recently install spamassassin in freebsd but i can't find
> > the file that contain the scores i need to chage for example
> > NO_RDNS rule to give 3.0 but i can't find the file
> >
> > 0.5 NO_RDNS
> I got this email with a high score of 101.6 and the version as 3.0.2. I
> have my score limit set to 3.5 in my local.cf file. Why wasn't this
> detected as spam?
>
> HEADER OF PROBLEM EMAIL:
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.6 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_00,FM_NO_STYLE,
> HTML_80_90,HTML_MESSAGE,
I've recently switched from running spamd on our mail server machine,
where all users have direct access to their SA config in their home
directory, to running spamd on a second machine and using
--virtual-config-dir for user configuration. (SA 3.1.1)
One side-effect of this was that the bayes da
Title: Message
I got this email
with a high score of 101.6 and the version as 3.0.2. I have my score limit
set to 3.5 in my local.cf file. Why wasn't this detected as
spam?
Also when I run
spamassassin -v on my server I get the version as 3.1.1 but the email header has
3.0.2 as the version?
Title: Message
I got this email
with a high score of 101.6 and the version as 3.0.2. I have my score limit
set to 3.5 in my local.cf file. Why wasn't this detected as
spam?
Also when I run
spamassassin -v on my server I get the version as 3.1.1 but the email header has
3.0.2 as the version?
Pablo Allietti wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:20:22AM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> >
> > The file that has scores for the default rules is
> > /usr/share/spamassassin/50_scores.cf.
> >
> > However, you do not want to make changes to that file, because they
> > will be overwritten every time
Unfortunately this is what I may be forced to do. I hate to let one
item give a high score, but when the message is nothing but an
IMAGE... no HTML... no link... and the blacklists have not yet picked
it up.. and Pyzor doesn't see it yet... what else can you do?
On 4/22/06, John D. Hardin <[EMAIL
I want to run just the bayes test on several files and get bayes scores
I tried writing my own script using Mail::SpamAssassin but thats seems
to not give any score at all.
Is there any ready script available
Or can I get any pointers
Thanks
Ram
Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> It's me again with another doubt =P I'm stuck in this Domain Keys thing
> because I don't know how to create a public and a private key for my
> server. I already read the http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys to
> understand how Domain Keys work but
Hello List,
It's me again with another doubt =P I'm stuck in this Domain Keys thing
because I don't know how to create a public and a private key for my
server. I already read the http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys to
understand how Domain Keys work but I can't go on with only this argument.
Paul Wetter wrote:
> Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in
> operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to
> my next question.
>
> I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be
> working. If I do a manual check
Pablo Allietti wrote:
> hi all i recently install spamassassin in freebsd but i can't find
> the file that contain the scores i need to chage for example
> NO_RDNS rule to give 3.0 but i can't find the file
>
> 0.5 NO_RDNSSending MTA has no reverse DNS (Postfix
> variant)
> 0.8 B
hi all i recently install spamassassin in freebsd but i can't find the
file that contain the scores i need to chage for example NO_RDNS rule to
give 3.0 but i can't find the file
0.5 NO_RDNSSending MTA has no reverse DNS (Postfix
variant)
0.8 BR_REMOVER_QUOTE BODY: Inclui
On Monday, April 24, 2006, 5:42:16 AM, Craig McLean wrote:
> Smells like 419 to me, given (among other things) the level of literacy
> displayed. If you have no objections I'll drop the sender a line and
> see what the scam is...
Or better, ask savethechildren.org to comment:
[DOMAIN whois inf
Paul Wetter wrote:
Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in
operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to
my next question.
I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be
working. If I do a manual check (with t
Probably would also like this output, i think:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep -i razor
[4398] dbg: diag: module installed: Razor2::Client::Agent, version 2.75
[4398] dbg: config: read file /usr/share/spamassassin/25_razor2.cf
[4398] dbg: plugin: fixed relative path:
/us
Good point, you're completely right! Thanks for pointing that out... :)
Cheers,
Jeremy
"John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Apr 25, 2006, at 6:33 AM, Jeremy Fairbrass wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> /style="[^>]+color:blue/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Just a smal
Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in
operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to my
next question.
I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be
working. If I do a manual check (with the amavis user) it l
40 matches
Mail list logo
