On Saturday 22 April 2006 08:54 pm, Mike Galvez wrote:
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=9.2
...
> But no X-Spam-Score
Score was 9.2.
Its right there in X-Spam-Status
--
_
John Andersen
pgpBKGzG8No2x.pgp
Description: signature
Hello, Razvan-san.
I searched in my this ML's mailbox for finding "span float" spam,
so I found your mail.
From: Razvan Cosma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: one SPAM
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:48:20 +0300
> Hi,
>
> Michael Monnerie wrote:
> > On Donnerstag, 20. April 2006 14:28 Razvan Cosma w
Matt Kettler wrote:
M.Lewis wrote:
Is there a way to check that Pyzor (and Razor) are working? I'm
running SA 3.1.1.
I never see any Razor or Pyzor information in the headers of spam.
spamassassin -D --lint shows in part:
[8310] dbg: plugin: registering glue method for check_pyzor
(Mail::Spa
On 4/21/06, Michael Monnerie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don't get a spamd log when SA is called via amavis. That's not good
> if you want stats. So what could we do to have that?
>
> SA is called directly via Mail::SpamAssassin from amavis. Is it possible
> to configure that to log like spamd
M.Lewis wrote:
> Is there a way to check that Pyzor (and Razor) are working? I'm
> running SA 3.1.1.
>
> I never see any Razor or Pyzor information in the headers of spam.
>
> spamassassin -D --lint shows in part:
>
> [8310] dbg: plugin: registering glue method for check_pyzor
> (Mail::SpamAssassi
Hello,
I have searched the archives, but I can't find an answer to why I
can't add headers such as "X-Spam-Score".
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.1.1, Sendmail and spamass-milter-0.3.0_1
My local.cf has:
add_header all Score _SCORE_
version=_VERSION_
add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
report_safe 2
loc
Is there a way to check that Pyzor (and Razor) are working? I'm running
SA 3.1.1.
I never see any Razor or Pyzor information in the headers of spam.
spamassassin -D --lint shows in part:
[8310] dbg: plugin: registering glue method for check_pyzor
(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor=HASH(0x9df
Hi,
Quick background: I've run SA (using amavisd-new and postfix) for a few years,
on a server hosting a few domains. I may say I have some understanding of SA and
rudimentary understanding of statistics. I've read docs and searched the mailing
list for previous discussions on this topic, and fin
Mike Pepe wrote:
>
>> We need some background on your setup:
>>
>> How do you call SA to get your mail scanned at delivery time?
>> Do you use spamd to scan your mail?
>> If so, did you restart spamd after adding your rule?
>> Where is your CATHY_CAPARULA rule declared (ie: what file)?
>
> Hi Mat
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Matt wrote:
> We have received a large quantity of spam that is nothing but a large
> image. Spamassassin is tagging it a little because it is an image,
> and only an image, however I'm wondering how other people are
> handeling this type of spam?I don't want to score mai
We need some background on your setup:
How do you call SA to get your mail scanned at delivery time?
Do you use spamd to scan your mail?
If so, did you restart spamd after adding your rule?
Where is your CATHY_CAPARULA rule declared (ie: what file)?
Hi Matt,
The system is FC3, running SA 3.1
Mike Pepe wrote:
> Hi folks, I got two spams through today and I'm a little confused as
> to why.
>
> Spam 1:
>
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 22 01:28:34 2006
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on quadzilla
> X-Spam-Level: **
> X-Spam-St
Hi folks, I got two spams through today and I'm a little confused as to why.
Spam 1:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 22 01:28:34 2006
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on quadzilla
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 t
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> Hi, I've setup a new server, and made
> # sudo -H -u vscan sa-learn --ham --progress --no-sync
> --mbox /tmp/ham.txt
> 3.59 msgs/sec 31m43s DONE
> Learned tokens from 6842 message(s) (6842 message(s) examined)
>
I don't know why it's not working, but the FIRST thing t
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 07:42 -0400, Chris Arnold wrote:
> Hello all! I was using spamassassin 2.64 on Novell OES (SuSe based) and
> trying to upgrade to 3.1.1. So i uninstalled the 2.64 version and made
> the RPM's from the source. I then tried to install the rpm's, the perl=*
> package installed bu
Hello all! I was using spamassassin 2.64 on Novell OES (SuSe based) and
trying to upgrade to 3.1.1. So i uninstalled the 2.64 version and made
the RPM's from the source. I then tried to install the rpm's, the perl=*
package installed but the spamassassin package failed. So i installed
from source u
Hi, I've setup a new server, and made
# sudo -H -u vscan sa-learn --ham --progress --no-sync
--mbox /tmp/ham.txt
3.59 msgs/sec 31m43s DONE
Learned tokens from 6842 message(s) (6842 message(s) examined)
And the same for SPAM, and then I have this:
# sudo -H -u vscan sa-learn --dump
0.000
You don't get a spamd log when SA is called via amavis. That's not good
if you want stats. So what could we do to have that?
SA is called directly via Mail::SpamAssassin from amavis. Is it possible
to configure that to log like spamd?
The other idea I have is to disable SA support in amavis, an
18 matches
Mail list logo
