Jason Marshall schrieb:
> I'm sure I'm not the first one to suggest this, but why NOT always display
> the numbers in their entirety? I can't think of any reason why a user
> would say "please give me less accuracy and a lot more confusion in return
> for fewer digits to parse".
But I can - a
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Matt Kettler wrote:
[snip..]
> (who on earth still uses SRV records for anything?)
The 800 Lb Gorilla of Redmond. ;)
Most modern Kerberos clients will use them to find KDCs
if properly set up.
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
College
Maybe its my imagination, but it seems ever since the razor license was
changed I get two or three of these when manually reporting a spam. The
whole error is:
warn: reporter: razor2 report failed: No such file or directory reporter:
razor2 had unknown error during authenticate
at /usr/lib/p
Dave Stern wrote:
> I'm trying to get SA working by remote connections and don't see it
> consistantly working.
>
> Users kick off SA in their .procmailrc on our mail server which can't
> handle
> a more recent version of SA so we only have v2.64 installed locally.
> (Don't
> ask)
>
> What I'd like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Abel Jeffcoat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to install the new version of Spamassasian on a new mail
> server I building. I'm using Fedora Core 4, and I have the latest
> updates for Perl, etc.
>
> When I attempt to install it via cpan. Does anyonr
As stated above: "That's rather ugly and creates a cluttered report".
And as I stated below, I disagree.
Yes, and it's unnecessary. Life is full of round-number issues.
This one would have been pretty avoidable.
accept rounding is unavoidable. People like rounded numbers because they are
f
Jason Marshall wrote:
>> But SA rounds that rule score to 1.7 to save display space. Most SA rules
>> actually have scores with 3 decimal places. (ie: 1.268)
>
>> The "real" answer would be to always display 3-decimal place scores,
>> but that's rather of ugly and creates a cluttered report. Howev
But SA rounds that rule score to 1.7 to save display space. Most SA rules
actually have scores with 3 decimal places. (ie: 1.268)
The "real" answer would be to always display 3-decimal place scores, but
that's rather of ugly and creates a cluttered report. However, you'd
always be 100% accurat
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Jason Marshall wrote:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_60,SARE_MLB_Stock1,
>> TW_AQ autolearn=no version=3.1.0
>> X-Spam-Report:
>> * 1.7 SARE_MLB_Stock1 BODY: SARE_MLB_Stock1
>> * 0.1 TW_AQ BODY: Odd Letter Triples with AQ
>> *
From: "Mike Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Well, I was off on Vancouver Island for nearly a week, and didn't take a
laptop with me... Clearly it caused some major trauma because I had the
following hallucinatory idea:
I was thinking about the issue in which sending spam isn't a crime in a
lot
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RoundingIssues
Thanks Daryl, I didn't realize the scores were actually accurate to 3
decimal places! Makes sense now, thanks!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Jason Marshall, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spots InterConn
Jason Marshall wrote:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_60,SARE_MLB_Stock1,
> TW_AQ autolearn=no version=3.1.0
> X-Spam-Report:
> * 1.7 SARE_MLB_Stock1 BODY: SARE_MLB_Stock1
> * 0.1 TW_AQ BODY: Odd Letter Triples with AQ
> * 1.0 BAYES_60 BODY: Bayesian spam
Jason Marshall wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_60,SARE_MLB_Stock1,
TW_AQ autolearn=no version=3.1.0
X-Spam-Report:
* 1.7 SARE_MLB_Stock1 BODY: SARE_MLB_Stock1
* 0.1 TW_AQ BODY: Odd Letter Triples with AQ
* 1.0 BAYES_60 BODY: Bayesian spam probabilit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_60,SARE_MLB_Stock1,
TW_AQ autolearn=no version=3.1.0
X-Spam-Report:
* 1.7 SARE_MLB_Stock1 BODY: SARE_MLB_Stock1
* 0.1 TW_AQ BODY: Odd Letter Triples with AQ
* 1.0 BAYES_60 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 60 to 80%
*
Don Levey wrote:
>> and uses the presence of this copywritten key to match the
>> appropriate string in the DNS as proof that the sender is who he
>> says he is.
>>
>> -Philip
>
> Reminds me of Habeus...
Indeed, this is almost exactly Habeas.
http://www.habeas.com/
Spam Fighter Habeas Wins One
Philip Prindeville wrote:
And then had hosts participating in this scheme generate outgoing mail as:
X-Yes-Its-Really-Me: XYZZY 123 456 (C) Copyright 2006 Redfish Solutions,
LLC"
and uses the presence of this copywritten key to match the appropriate
string
in the DNS as proof that the sender is
If anyone would like to make use of it, I ended up using:
# for mime headers...
mimeheader __CTYPE_MH_TEXT_PLAIN Content-Type =~ /text\/plain/i
mimeheader __CTYPE_MH_HTML Content-Type =~ /text\/html/i
# don't allow windows-1252 text attachments...
mimeheader __CTYPE_MH_WIN1252 Content-Type
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Would it be worth adding a rule that has a low value that people can then
increment as they see fit (like setting the score to 6.0)?
That's not more spam than when you get confirmation for ML subscription.
anybody can put your address on a mailman web interface, on a
1. Skip CPAN and just download the tar.gz file.
2. Extract it
3. Goto the Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.1 you just extracted and type "make
Makefile.PL"
4. make
5. make install
There is a nice startup script under Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.1/spamd called
redhat-rc-script.sh. Just copy to your /etc/rc.d/i
Philip Prindeville wrote:
> I periodically get automated emails from people I mostly don't know
> or know only remotely asking me to update some contact information
> for them... and it's always from Plaxo. Looking at the headers, the
> origin looks legit.
>
> This seems to be a service that mai
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 12:07:00PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
--=_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Using:
# don't allow windows-1252 text attachments...
header __CT
Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
> What if we had a TXT Record in the DNS for a domain that looked like:
>
> @IN TXT "XYZZY 123 456 (C) Copyright 2006 Redfish
> Solutions, LLC"
>
> And then had hosts participating in this scheme generate outgoing
> mail as:
>
> X-Yes-Its-Really-
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 12:07:00PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>>>--=_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016
>>>Content-Type: text/plain;
>>>charset="Windows-1252"
>>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Using:
>># don't allow windows
Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>
>
> Would it be worth adding a rule that has a low value that people can then
> increment as they see fit (like setting the score to 6.0)?
Locally? sure.. In a downloadable add-on? maybe. In the SA distro? No. The main
SA distro has no place containing policy rules
Well, I was off on Vancouver Island for nearly a week, and didn't take a
laptop with me... Clearly it caused some major trauma because I had the
following hallucinatory idea:
I was thinking about the issue in which sending spam isn't a crime in a
lot
of countries, or if it is that it's poorly
That might not be necessary.
A lot of ISP's have a zero tolerance policy for copyright infringement,
even if they don't enforce spamming policy.
-Philip
Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
>So everytime someone uses your copyrighted dns entry YOUR
>going to:
>Find them
>Sue them
>Prove in a court of law it
On Monday 03 April 2006 14:16, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>Well, I was off on Vancouver Island for nearly a week, and didn't take
> a laptop with me... Clearly it caused some major trauma because I
> had the following hallucinatory idea:
>
>I was thinking about the issue in which sending spam isn't
So everytime someone uses your copyrighted dns entry YOUR
going to:
Find them
Sue them
Prove in a court of law it was them
etc...
- Original Message -
>Well, I was off on Vancouver Island for nearly a week, and
>didn't take a laptop with me... Clearly it caused some
>major trauma because
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 12:07:00PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> > --=_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="Windows-1252"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> Using:
> # don't allow windows-1252 text attachments...
> header __CTYP
Well, I was off on Vancouver Island for nearly a week, and didn't take a
laptop with me... Clearly it caused some major trauma because I had the
following hallucinatory idea:
I was thinking about the issue in which sending spam isn't a crime in a lot
of countries, or if it is that it's poorly enf
On Monday 03 April 2006 12:59, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>I periodically get automated emails from people I mostly don't know
>or know only remotely asking me to update some contact information
>for them... and it's always from Plaxo. Looking at the headers, the
>origin looks legit.
>
>This seems
I was trying to filter messages like:
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from redfish-solutions.com (ppp125-53.dsl-coc.eth.net
> [61.11.125.53] (may be forged))
> by mail.redfish-solutions.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
> k1SGqvTs021448
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue
Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>http://socialsoftware.weblogsinc.com/2004/03/23/why-do-really-smart-people-hate-plaxo-so-much-or-tim-koogle/
>http://socialsoftware.weblogsinc.com/2004/03/24/plaxo-not-evil/
>
>
>http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=14545
>
>
>Based on the above it looks like a "social networ
Hello,
I'm trying to install the new version of Spamassasian on a new mail
server I building. I'm using Fedora Core 4, and I have the latest
updates for Perl, etc.
When I attempt to install it via cpan. Does anyonr of any experience
getting Spamassasian installed on Fedora Core 4?
Any help
Philip Prindeville wrote:
> I periodically get automated emails from people I mostly don't know
> or know only remotely asking me to update some contact information
> for them... and it's always from Plaxo. Looking at the headers, the
> origin looks legit.
>
> This seems to be a service that mai
Philip Prindeville wrote:
I periodically get automated emails from people I mostly don't know
or know only remotely asking me to update some contact information
for them... and it's always from Plaxo. Looking at the headers, the
origin looks legit.
This seems to be a service that maintains co
I periodically get automated emails from people I mostly don't know
or know only remotely asking me to update some contact information
for them... and it's always from Plaxo. Looking at the headers, the
origin looks legit.
This seems to be a service that maintains contact information for
its use
I'm trying to get SA working by remote connections and don't see it
consistantly working.
Users kick off SA in their .procmailrc on our mail server which can't handle
a more recent version of SA so we only have v2.64 installed locally. (Don't
ask)
What I'd like to do is have a call in their .pr
Michael Shuler wrote:
> I am using Postfix and Spam Assassin. For some reason some messages that
> are blatantly SPAM are not getting the X-Spam-Score added to them. They
> show that they are received by Postfix (in the header) but they are not
> scanned from what I can tell (X-Spam entries). Wh
I am using Postfix and Spam Assassin. For some reason some messages that
are blatantly SPAM are not getting the X-Spam-Score added to them. They
show that they are received by Postfix (in the header) but they are not
scanned from what I can tell (X-Spam entries). When I had version 3.1.0 it
was
I'm about to move my bayes and auto-whitelist data from local db-files
on each server to a common MySQL-db.
I have 2+2 load balanced servers scanning mail using amavisd-new for
different kinds of customers, home and corporate users repectively, and
I was planning to keep their respective dat
Just finished upgrading to v. 3.1.1 from 3.1.0. I'm also using the following SARE rules:
70_sare_adult.cf
70_sare_bayes_poison_nxm.cf
70_sare_evilnum0.cf
70_sare_evilnum1.cf
70_sare_evilnum2.cf
70_sare_genlsubj.cf
70_sare_header.cf
70_sare_highrisk.cf
70_sare_html.cf
70_sare_obfu.cf
70_sare_obfu2.
42 matches
Mail list logo
