On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled:
> And while my mind is fertile (as in full of ) today I just flashed
> on the concept of a modified SpamAssassin tool as a "RepeatAssassin" for
> mailinglists. If an issue has come up before it fires off the WHOLE thread
> to the (hapless) repeat poste
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Matt Kettler stipulated:
> I'm just pointing out the only time I've had the dual-install problem was due
> to
> a CPAN install, not a source install.. And that was a LONG time ago.
I've had it on boxes with vendor trees of perl in strange places and
multiple simultaneously li
Regarding my earlier message that didn't get through (because of its
spamful nature), see it on pastebin:
http://pastebin.com/611864
-Philip
Yeah, and how can I implement something like that when
my host provides Cpanel?
When you throw out those command lines, I'm afraid I
don't know how/where to add those in. I do know how to
manipulate Cpanel from a user's standpoint, but that's about it.
All I'm after is to block emails based on th
Nix wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Matt Kettler said:
>> On the other hand back in 2.31 era I was using cpan, and I *did* get a dual
>> install once. However that was CPAN deciding to install a whole new copy of
>> perl
>> to put SA into because the required perl version was screwed up.
>
> Well,
Matt Kettler a écrit :
>>header RELAY_CN *X*-*Relay*-*Countries*=~/\bCN\b/
>>describe RELAY_CN Relayed through china
>>score RELAY_CN 1.0
>>
>>
>>header RELAY_KR *X*-*Relay*-*Countries*=~/\bKR\b/
>>describe RELAY_KR Relayed through Korea
>>score RELAY_KR 1.0
>>
>
>
> Erk! How'd thos
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Matt Kettler said:
> On the other hand back in 2.31 era I was using cpan, and I *did* get a dual
> install once. However that was CPAN deciding to install a whole new copy of
> perl
> to put SA into because the required perl version was screwed up.
Well, you'll be glad to kno
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:48:15 -0500, Payal Rathod wrote
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 02:21:56PM -0500, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I'm happy to say that with your help, and some very minor tweaking, the
> > "Pharama" mail is now tagged in my system as high scoring spam, and
> > dealt
