Hi,
I just received a message for one of my users that got triggered as spam
by the below rules. How can I let the messages coming from that address
pass through these rules? I remember I have added this particular list
address in amavisd.conf as following:
# read_hash("/var/amavis/sender_scores_s
Hi, all:
I am using sa-learn to train my bayes filter. And I collect many
known spams from our honey pot.
I found that there are so many mails with the same content in
this spam corpus. Is it necessary to delete the repeated spams before
sa-learn study?
Thanks :)
--
Xue
If someone threatened me like that I'd totally block them and tell them
to bring it on.
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 09:56:14PM -0500, Gabriel Wachman wrote:
> During training I run:
> sa-learn --dbpath $WORKDIR --ham $DATADIR/$message_dir
> (likewise for spam)
>
> During testing I run:
> spamassassin -t -p $PREFSPATH $DATADIR/$message_dir
You may want to look into mass-check. It's much
Gabriel Wachman a écrit :
>
> Yes. I know it may sound strange from some people's perspective, but
> there are good reasons we need to do it this way. We are comparing
> several spam filters; in order to make claims about the performance of
> any of the filters we need to evaulate a _fixed_ classi
Uwe Kiewel a écrit :
>>
>>>The best solution would be to make your users send with SMTP-AUTH,
>>>and
>>>then tell whatever calls SpamAssassin to skip SA if it finds valid
>>>SMTP-AUTH info.
>>>
>>>I'd guess from your description, however, that you're running
>>>SpamAssassin on delivery and not on
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 10:50:19PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Even with bayes_auto_learn disabled, the tokens' atimes are still
> updated. That's the way SpamAssassin works. That's what helps
> SpamAssassin's bayes implementation in being effective.
Well, sort of. The atime updates ar
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 04/03/06 09:56 PM, Gabriel Wachman wrote:
A colleague and I are writing a paper about a spam filter he developed.
We'd like to compare it against various open source filters, including
SpamAssassin. The methodology we are using is to train the filter on a
set of mes
From: "mouss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gabriel Wachman a écrit :
A colleague and I are writing a paper about a spam filter he developed.
We'd like to compare it against various open source filters, including
SpamAssassin. The methodology we are using is to train the filter on a
set of messages, and
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> POP-before-SMTP olso works with imap
>
> only bad thing about POP-before-SMTP is that it does not work if
> POP-before-SMTP user is behind a NAT ip
>
> if a user sits behind NAT it could open relay for more then one user, that
> the only reason i do not use
> POP-before
Gabriel Wachman a écrit :
> A colleague and I are writing a paper about a spam filter he developed.
> We'd like to compare it against various open source filters, including
> SpamAssassin. The methodology we are using is to train the filter on a
> set of messages, and then test it on an independent
11 matches
Mail list logo
