Hi
The SpamAssassin Gateway receives emails from the internet, filters and
forwards them (both, Spam and Ham) to the internal MTA. Thus, my users have
their spam-quarantine inboxes on the internal MTA.
I'm thinking about implementing a function on the SpamAssassin Gateway to
have SA learn spam and
I just received a (valid) email notification from a Web service that got
a score of 7/5.
It contained the following scores
2.5 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTMLOutlook can't send HTML message only
3.4 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
That seems a bit of a double-whammy
I just committed this ruleset to:
http://rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_stocks.cf
Enjoy.
-Doc (SA/SARE/URIBL/SURBL -- Ninja)
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 07:45 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It seems my email appears on one of those "millions of emails" cdroms
Egads, are those things still out there? I used to get spammed with
offers for them. Of course, I don't get spam any more (thanks, SA
team)!
Thomas
I finally got curl installed and "fixed".
The problem with both is our proxy server obviously doesn't handle
"basic" proxy authentication. There's a curl option that's
something like --any_authentication that tries all different kinds of auth.
That finally got me through.
I have been only tryi
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 12:12 pm, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> Content analysis details: (11.8 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> --
> -- -0.0 NO_RELAYS
> Informational: message
I've been trying to get spamassassin to work with my working Postfix
mailserver and have tried long enough that I am afraid that I need
to ask for help. Help!
I am including below my best attempt at full details:
I've successfully installed spamassassin
% spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version
Matt Kettler wrote:
Matthias Keller wrote:
Hi
Today I received two mails which kept clogging my mailqueues as
spamassassin never terminated analyzing them.
I do have the two messages causing this on my SA 3.1.0 and the debug
output - it always hangs in the "running full-text regexp tes
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:48:17PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
I do have the two messages causing this on my SA 3.1.0 and the debug
output - it always hangs in the "running full-text regexp tests" section...
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/
It
Matthias Keller wrote:
> Hi
>
> Today I received two mails which kept clogging my mailqueues as
> spamassassin never terminated analyzing them.
>
> I do have the two messages causing this on my SA 3.1.0 and the debug
> output - it always hangs in the "running full-text regexp tests" section..
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:48:17PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> >I do have the two messages causing this on my SA 3.1.0 and the debug
> >output - it always hangs in the "running full-text regexp tests" section...
>
> http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/
It would also help to mention if y
Matthias Keller wrote:
Hi
Today I received two mails which kept clogging my mailqueues as
spamassassin never terminated analyzing them.
I do have the two messages causing this on my SA 3.1.0 and the debug
output - it always hangs in the "running full-text regexp tests" section...
Could
Hi
Today I received two mails which kept clogging my mailqueues as
spamassassin never terminated analyzing them.
I do have the two messages causing this on my SA 3.1.0 and the debug
output - it always hangs in the "running full-text regexp tests" section...
Could someone from Spamassass
Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:14 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: General assistance
Chris Santerre wrote:
I would like to make a quick comment to everyone who has
helped in this
Title: RE: General assistance
> -Original Message-
> From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:14 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: General assistance
>
>
> Chris Santerre wrote:
> > I would like to make a quick comment to everyo
Chris Santerre wrote:
I would like to make a quick comment to everyone who has helped in this
thread:
Great job. Seriously. Some good answers here. Can we we all take a minute to
make sure these answers are posted somewhere on the SA wiki's for future
reference? Its been a while since we had a p
Title: RE: General assistance
I would like to make a quick comment to everyone who has helped in this thread:
Great job. Seriously. Some good answers here. Can we we all take a minute to make sure these answers are posted somewhere on the SA wiki's for future reference? Its been a while sinc
Gene Heskett a écrit :
> On Tuesday 14 February 2006 05:18, Loren Wilton wrote:
>
>>But one does have to wonder why they bothered sending it!
>>
>>Subject: SPAM:(L2) Making any textile product for you to save your
>>cost(usa) Date: Tue, 07 Feb 06 09:04:02 ¥x¥_¼Ð·Ç®É¶¡
>>X-WinProxy-AntiSpam-Message
jdow a écrit :
>
> The real problem here is that it is a unique solution for every user.
> The not quite so nasty problem is the number of different ways to render
> my name, especially if I allow for most of the common fsckups.
>
agreed. I have many contacts who add me to their own addr book wi
Barton L. Phillips wrote:
> Is there a combined list distribution? Many other email lists
> distribute one combined email per day instead of dozens of separate
> email. The volume of emails makes it hard to keep up .
>
One thing you can do is set up a separate folder for each mailing list
you subs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get rulesdejour going here and having one heck of a time
> making it through my proxy.
>
> to access the proxy server. I have the proxy_user and proxy_password
> configured in my
> /usr/local/etc/wgetrc file, but continue to receive "407
> Authentication
J. TOUIN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How stop this new spam !
> No URL, no texte, only image !
> Only DNSBL could be use on it...
>
First, that email message was slightly corrupted. The headers are missing.
Second, there's plenty of text in that message. However, it's using HTML tags to
make the text invi
Hi,
How stop this new spam !
No URL, no texte, only image !
Only DNSBL could be use on it...
Regards,
J.Touin
begin 666 excel _futures accesys.eml
M1G)O;3H@([EMAIL PROTECTED]'0B(#QO>6UL;GIW:$!C879T96PN;F5T/@T*
M5&\Z(#QA8V-E7,N8V]M/BP-"@D\7,N8V]M
M/@T*4W5B:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@7V9U='5R97,@86-C97-Y
On Feb 14, 2006, at 10:47 AM, DAve wrote:
Daniel Cañas Montero wrote:
On Feb 11, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Ed Russell wrote:
I have to say a heartfelt THANK YOU to everyone who contributed
to this
thread. My filter is working 500% more efficient that it ever
was. I have
done the following:
1
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 05:18, Loren Wilton wrote:
>But one does have to wonder why they bothered sending it!
>
>Subject: SPAM:(L2) Making any textile product for you to save your
> cost(usa) Date: Tue, 07 Feb 06 09:04:02 ¥x¥_¼Ð·Ç®É¶¡
>X-WinProxy-AntiSpam-Message: Scanned by
> http://www.WinPro
Daniel Cañas Montero wrote:
On Feb 11, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Ed Russell wrote:
I have to say a heartfelt THANK YOU to everyone who contributed to this
thread. My filter is working 500% more efficient that it ever was.
I have
done the following:
1.Installed djbdns and I am using dnscache
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# cat /etc/dnscache/log/run
#!/bin/sh
#exec setuidgid gdnslog multilog t ./main
exec setuidgid gdnslog multilog -*
You can see that as opposed to multilog t ./main I use multilog -*
That will do it. Enjoy.
Ed
---
Talk is
on 2/14/06 11:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> OK,I have done this countless times and have never had this problem.
>>>
>>> I have tried installing SA on a new system running OS X and Perl 5.8.8
>>>
>>> Everything seems to go through fine, as usual, but none of the script
On Feb 11, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Ed Russell wrote:
I have to say a heartfelt THANK YOU to everyone who contributed to
this
thread. My filter is working 500% more efficient that it ever
was. I have
done the following:
1. Installed djbdns and I am using dnscache as I was told. I have
inc
on 2/14/06 11:08 AM, Matt Kettler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> OK,I have done this countless times and have never had this problem.
>>
>> I have tried installing SA on a new system running OS X and Perl 5.8.8
>>
>> Everything seems to go through fine, as usual, but none of the scripts get
>> i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> OK,I have done this countless times and have never had this problem.
>
> I have tried installing SA on a new system running OS X and Perl 5.8.8
>
> Everything seems to go through fine, as usual, but none of the scripts get
> installed in the usr/bin folder. All the o
OK,I have done this countless times and have never had this problem.
I have tried installing SA on a new system running OS X and Perl 5.8.8
Everything seems to go through fine, as usual, but none of the scripts get
installed in the usr/bin folder. All the other support folders and libraries
go
If you have it on your startup items, you can use systemstarter,
sudo systemstarter restart spamd
If you don't know you can restart spamd by:
ps -auxx | grep spam
root11981 0.0 -1.153504 23480 ?? Ss date time /usr/
bin/spamd -d(cp this)
sudo kill -9 119
Yes, I believe I outlined this in a previous message.
HFC
mouss wrote:
Henry F. Camacho Jr a écrit :
Matt:
Hmmm... Matt, this is exactly what init is designed to do, it will
respawn any daemon that stops running, and reruns it automatically.
Some people use something called daemon tool
Harry Putnam wrote:
> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> Well, that particular subject looks to only contain ordinary ascii.
>> Can't hit any CHARSET rules when there's no charachter set to hit.
>>
>
> I hadn't understood it was based on a charset being stipulated.
>
Yes, ch
That would probably depend on how you started it in the first place
(launchd, a Startup Item, etc.)
On Feb 14, 2006, at 4:28 AM, Patrick Sneyers wrote:
Hi,
Can anybody tell me what command shoud be used on
Mac OSX 10.3 (Panther)
Mac OSX 10.4 (Tiger)
to restart spamd?
Thanks,
Patrick Sneyers
"jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nothing of note "short circuits" any of the SpamAssassin tests. They all
> have to be evaluated because a positive or negative score might get over-
> ridden by subsequent processing. Suppose you had a whitelist entry that
> forgot and sent you a message in Spa
On Dienstag, 14. Februar 2006 14:05 Harry Putnam wrote:
> Judging from yours and other posts on this thread, I'm looking for
> something that is able to tell with some certainty when a subject
> line is not in english. Something that gets to a message before SA
> is called. Like maybe a nifty pr
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, that particular subject looks to only contain ordinary ascii.
> Can't hit any CHARSET rules when there's no charachter set to hit.
I hadn't understood it was based on a charset being stipulated.
> Are you using ok_languages as well?
My Mail::Spam
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> and I also consider to reject mails that have a random
> display name added to my email
How do you do that?
I'd sure love to reject e-mail that says To: Joe Smith
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but what about mail where they don't enter any
name?
Baby, bathwate
Hi,
Can anybody tell me what command shoud be used on
Mac OSX 10.3 (Panther)
Mac OSX 10.4 (Tiger)
to restart spamd?
Thanks,
Patrick Sneyers
Belgium
Harry Putnam wrote:
> Running spamassassin-3.1.0
>
> I have `ok_locales en' set in local.cf. I had hoped that would cut
> down on the amount of processing SA has to do, but I see messages with
> a subject line like this:
>
Turning on features will pretty much never reduce the amount of
processi
But one does have to wonder why they bothered sending it!
Subject: SPAM:(L2) Making any textile product for you to save your cost(usa)
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 06 09:04:02 ¥x¥_¼Ð·Ç®É¶¡
X-WinProxy-AntiSpam-Message: Scanned by http://www.WinProxy.com/WinProxy
X-WinProxy-AntiSpam: Spam (77.50%)
Yes, those
> I have `ok_locales en' set in local.cf. I had hoped that would cut
> down on the amount of processing SA has to do, but I see messages with
> a subject line like this:
>
> Subject: Replicas dos melhores relogios
>
> That still grind thru lots of processing and never did hit the
>"C
> > and I also consider to reject mails that have a random
> > display name added to my email
>
> How do you do that?
>
> I'd sure love to reject e-mail that says To: Joe Smith
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but what about mail where they don't enter any
> name?
>
> Baby, bathwater...
You do it with a *rea
> But I think that some times ago I got some rules and when I made
> upgrade to new version it stop to worked.
>
> 20_porn.cf
> bogus-virus-warnings.cf
> chickenpox.cf
> evilrules.cf local.cf-new
> antidrug.cf br_rules.cf
> DomainDigits1.cf
> viruses.cf
Many of these are common files. Unless th
Nothing of note "short circuits" any of the SpamAssassin tests. They all
have to be evaluated because a positive or negative score might get over-
ridden by subsequent processing. Suppose you had a whitelist entry that
forgot and sent you a message in Spanish?
{^_^}
- Original Message -
> My Spamassassin worked for years without skipping any emails. Suddenly
> (and not coresponding to an upgrade) emails started showing up in my inbox
> without spamassassin headers.
Look in your log and see if you have reports of an 'insecure dependency' in
SA.
Loren
Running spamassassin-3.1.0
I have `ok_locales en' set in local.cf. I had hoped that would cut
down on the amount of processing SA has to do, but I see messages with
a subject line like this:
Subject: Replicas dos melhores relogios
That still grind thru lots of processing and never did hit the
49 matches
Mail list logo
