Yes, the "To" also has the username of the account. I'll give a try to your
proposal shortly at work. Thanks
Ruben
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: lunes, 06 de febrero de 2006 0:40
> Para: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Asunto: Re: Little c
Yeah, all of them match the HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12 rule, but not the rest of
them. As an initial measure I raised the score for that rule, but I
understand that's not the solution.
Ruben
> These are caught quite easily on my home system:
>
> Content analysis details: (42.1 points, 5.0 required)
>
Dirk,
I adjusted the rights as follows in /etc/mail/spamassassin:
drw-rw-rw- 3 root root 352 Feb 5 17:04 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root80 Jul 13 2005 ..
drw-rw-rw- 2 root users 48 Nov 29 15:15 bayes
-rw--- 1 root root60 Feb 5 07:54 bayes.lock
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root users 1.2M Feb 4 17
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Philip will get no further help from me until he modifies his ACLs.
Final-Recipient: rfc822; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.0 MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 550 REPLY:
550_5.0.0_This_provider_is_blacklisted
Sorry, I don't help p
> header __LW_BLAH1ALL =~ /\nTo:[^<\n]+<[EMAIL
> PROTECTED])[^\n]+.*\nSubject:\s*Fw:
> \1\b/i
> header __LW_BLAH2ALL =~ /\nSubject:\s*Fw:
> (\w+)[^\n]*.*\nTo:[^<\n]+<\1\@/i
> metaLW_BLAH__LW_BLAH1 || __LW_BLAH2
> scoreLW_BLAH1
I see those lines wrapped. The first 4 lines
Chris Santerre wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Doc Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 5:14 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Pump and Dump SARE rules
>
>
> http://rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_stocks.cf
>
> Is the latest
> mainly composed by an image and its subject is always "FW: blah" where
> "blah" is the destination account. This is, if the mail is sent to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] the subject is always "Fw: john"
>
> Can that be matched by a rule?
Depends. Does the "to" also have the username of the account? If
Well, the autolearn=no is pretty obvious from the lines you posted. You
seem to have the defualt autolearn scores, which is something like 0.5 for
ham and 10 for spam. Most of those messages hit between the .5 and 10, so
they won't be autolearned either way.
One I saw got 0, and should have been
On Sunday 05 February 2006 2:25 pm, Ruben Cardenal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In one of my servers (7200 accounts) I'm receiving tons of a spam that
> is mainly composed by an image and its subject is always "FW: blah" where
> "blah" is the destination account. This is, if the mail is sent to
> [EMAIL PROT
Brian,
what strikes me is that bayes is that
- you don't have any network tests - do you run spamd/spamassassin with
the '-L'-Option?
- bayes doesn't show up either in the results but there seem to be tries
to autolearn. My guess would be to check permissions in /etc/mail/ - does
the user running
mouss a écrit :
> The SARE_URI_EQUALS triggers on text like this
>
> ip(foo.example.com) REMOVESPACE =$ip
>
> with spaces around the '=' sign removed.
>
> Seems like a bug to me, no?
>
>
The above was posted on 04-01-2006.
found another bug/whateveryouprefertonameit:
The following 3 l
Hi,
In one of my servers (7200 accounts) I'm receiving tons of a spam that is
mainly composed by an image and its subject is always "FW: blah" where
"blah" is the destination account. This is, if the mail is sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] the subject is always "Fw: john"
Can that be matched by a r
From: "Jonn R Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi all,
Is some one maintaining the user prefs still??? The last
version at sourceforge.net is not usable for 3.1. I
rewrote part of it, but was just wondering.
It's probably meant as a model. As such it should have comments about what
works for var
If I use spamassassin -D --lint then it reveals that I'm at 3.0.2
I have posted the x-spam-status from 15 messages at
http://www.meehanontheweb.com/xspamstatus.txt
(the "software_spam_rule", which looks for 'software' in the subject, is
one I wrote in local.cf)
Autolearn sometimes says "failed" b
John,
I took it over to get it to 3.0. I haven't had time to work on it due
to work constrains. I'll be more than happy to let you and any others
take it over.
--
Benjamin Story, CCNA CCDA
Network Administrator
Dot Foods, Inc
www.dotfoods.com
IT Helpdesk x2312 or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Orig
On Sunday 05 February 2006 06:28, jdow wrote:
[...]
>
>> I take it you don't ever eat at Mac's then?
>
>Actually not. I thought there was a possibility the had a "customer
>loyalty" thing with birthdays and all that which you could register
>for and get discounts. As it turns out I guess they don't
Hi all,
Is some one maintaining the user prefs still??? The last
version at sourceforge.net is not usable for 3.1. I
rewrote part of it, but was just wondering.
Jonn
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Saturday 04 February 2006 19:53, jdow wrote:
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Has anyone noticed that the SA scores for the "McDONALDS Customer #"
spam are getting lower and lower? Another .4 reduction and they'll
pass SA here!
Out of cur
On Saturday 04 February 2006 01:10, Jeff Portwine wrote:
> Hello... I am a complete newbie with Spamassassin, so I hope you will all
> bear with me. The job of fixing our spam filter has fallen on me, as the
> person who used to handle everything relating to our mail server recently
> left my co
On Friday 03 February 2006 21:58, John Fleming wrote:
> >
> > Using the latest file from rules emporium, I made the file execuatable,
> > then:
> >
> > ./sa-stats-1.0.txt -l /var/log/spamassassin/ -f spamd.log
> >
> > For help:
> > ./sa-stats-1.0.txt -h
>
> Thanks for your response! I am running 3
20 matches
Mail list logo
