Justin Mason wrote:
> Hey all --
>
> Since there's now a few anti-spam bloggers about, I took the liberty of
> setting up a "Planet" on the subject:
>
> http://planet.spam.abuse.net/
>
> (A "Planet" is a subject-specific weblog aggregator; republishing weblog
> entries in a single place, and
Hey all --
Since there's now a few anti-spam bloggers about, I took the liberty of
setting up a "Planet" on the subject:
http://planet.spam.abuse.net/
(A "Planet" is a subject-specific weblog aggregator; republishing weblog
entries in a single place, and providing a central spot for a group
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 02:52 pm, Justin Mason wrote:
> Brian Godette writes:
> > On Tuesday 17 January 2006 01:02 pm, Justin Mason wrote:
> > > yeah, we were chatting about that on John-Graham Cumming's weblog. All
> > > I can think of is that they're attempting to evade another anti-spam
> > >
> > % spamassassin --lint shows no output, so I'm thinking that means no
> > problems in my local.cf.
>
> Good, 'spamassassin --lint' should show no outout, it ony barks when
> there's something wrong. Now 'spamassassin --lint -D' gives -tons-
> of output, but any error messages often get buried
PS: more RAM usually is a good idea but situations have been reported,
where adding memory just killed performance, so be careful with such
generalizations. There have been Intel-mainboard-chipsets with
2nd-level-caches supporting up to 256MB. Adding more memory gave you more
memory, sure. But
From: "Markus Braun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For an example setup:
If my network is 192.168.1.0/24 and I have two mailservers at
192.168.1.2 and 192.168.1.3, I could set it up two different ways.
Individually:
trusted_networks 192.168.1.2
trusted_networks 192.168.1.3
Or the entire netwo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Godette writes:
> On Tuesday 17 January 2006 01:02 pm, Justin Mason wrote:
> > yeah, we were chatting about that on John-Graham Cumming's weblog. All I
> > can think of is that they're attempting to evade another anti-spam
> > product, one that
Frank Bures wrote:
> Due to unfortunate typo, several Bayes databases were created on my system.
> I am running central Bayes database but now I have another one for the last
> two days.
> Is there a way how to import that database into the main one?
>
Short answer, no.
Long answer:
http://arti
Brian Godette wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 January 2006 01:02 pm, Justin Mason wrote:
>
>>yeah, we were chatting about that on John-Graham Cumming's weblog. All I
>>can think of is that they're attempting to evade another anti-spam
>>product, one that uses OCR, but is secret/proprietary hence *we* don't
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 01:02 pm, Justin Mason wrote:
> yeah, we were chatting about that on John-Graham Cumming's weblog. All I
> can think of is that they're attempting to evade another anti-spam
> product, one that uses OCR, but is secret/proprietary hence *we* don't
> know about it.
Or the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kendall Libby writes:
>
> I'm not entirely certain that this is a spamassassin issue, but since
> I can't find a more likely culprit I thought I'd check here... We're
> running SA 3.04 on Solaris 8.
>
> This past weekend our mail relays started usi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kelson Vibber writes:
> Got an interesting variation on those "Strong Buy!" stock scams.
> Instead of a straight message, they'd taken a screen shot of the pitch
> and rotated it slightly (presumably to make OCR more difficult), then
> placed the i
Bill Hacker wrote:
[...]
The volume, type, and size of messages and attachments, (spam and
genuine) is more important than user-count.
Have a look if your mail-throughput has increased since activating SA.
There have been reports where someone disabled recipient verification
when activating SA,
I'm not entirely certain that this is a spamassassin issue, but since
I can't find a more likely culprit I thought I'd check here... We're
running SA 3.04 on Solaris 8.
This past weekend our mail relays started using up too much swap.
Looking in /tmp, I fould a bunch of files similar to these:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi all,
i've SA-HEAD (r369233) installed on OSX 10.4.4
i'm running an sa-learn cron job on ham/spam folders. sometimes, of course,
those folders are
empty ...
i've started getting cron job errors of:
"config: no configuration text or files f
otubo wrote:
Friends,
I am running exim4 with SA for 216 users in a networkThe
configuration of my server is: P4 1.4GHz, 256 RAM and 40GB HD.
And myserver is NEW, i´ve just finished configuring it last week,
and it s
getting overloaded. The webmail takes too long to be loaded in a
brows
otubo wrote:
Friends,
I am running exim4 with SA for 216 users in a networkThe
configuration of my server is: P4 1.4GHz, 256 RAM and 40GB HD. And my
server is NEW, i´ve just finished configuring it last week, and it is
getting overloaded. The webmail takes too long to be loaded in a
brows
Thanks, Frank! This looks very useful.
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bures [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:05 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Merging Bayes database on a single system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Due to
Got an interesting variation on those "Strong Buy!" stock scams.
Instead of a straight message, they'd taken a screen shot of the pitch
and rotated it slightly (presumably to make OCR more difficult), then
placed the image in an email.
And yet check out the score it got:
Message scored 14.2 p
Clay Davis wrote:
> How do I dump my Bayes db so I can see what the tokes are scored at?
sa-learn --dump
However, if you use SA 3.0.0 or higher you won't be able to actually read the
tokens. They are stored in SHA hash form, and cannot be reversed back into the
original text.
The hashing provid
How do I dump my Bayes db so I can see what the tokes are scored at?
Thanks,
Clay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Due to unfortunate typo, several Bayes databases were created on my system.
I am running central Bayes database but now I have another one for the last
two days.
Is there a way how to import that database into the main one?
Thanks
Frank Bures, Dept
After someone commented recently on the overhead that the default awl
and bayes databases use and how using SQL could reduce that, I did some
testing with using SQL on a Windows server. You should be able to get
the latest MySQL, install it and follow the readme instructions to get
it going.
But,
All the mail that comes to the few users on my system is going through SA
just fine. I happen to also be using sendmail and spamass-milter and the
milter is set to reject mail before reception completes if SA says so.
I also run a few mailinglists. My problem is that I get a regular stream
of
otubo schrieb:
> Friends,
> I am running exim4 with SA for 216 users in a networkThe
> configuration of my server is: P4 1.4GHz, 256 RAM and 40GB HD. And my
> server is NEW, i´ve just finished configuring it last week, and it is
> getting overloaded. The webmail takes too long to be loaded
Justin Mason wrote:
>
> It'd be worth opening a feature enhancement request in the bugzilla
> for this. I'd like Michael to comment on it...
>
SQL configs are specifically generic, to work for the widest range of
people without editing. So I'd be -1 on a change like this, it possibly
narrows t
RAM add more RAM.
256MB is pretty low, it's probably swapping a lot.
Add more RAM - I've got 1.5GB for 120 users. BUT I have a lot extra Rulesets
etc. I';m using about 1.2GB but that includes a mysql emai logging DB as
well.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +4
Markus Braun wrote:
> > It's more like "I know all machines in 10.2.3.xxx belong to my
> > network which is safe and which I trust, so I'll add 10.2.3.xxx/24
> > to trusted_networks"
> >
> > I don't think it's safe to add a external network like gmx to your
> > trusted_networks list.
>
>
> But
Friends,
I am running exim4 with SA for 216 users in a networkThe
configuration of my server is: P4 1.4GHz, 256 RAM and 40GB HD. And my
server is NEW, i´ve just finished configuring it last week, and it is
getting overloaded. The webmail takes too long to be loaded in a
browser, the mail ak
Hi all (and Chris Thielen specifically)
I'm try to create some new RDJ config sets ... here's an example
JG_badhosts=9006;
CF_URLS[9006]="http://files.grayonline.id.au/rules/local_badhosts.
cf";
CF_NAMES[9006]="James Gray's badhost rules";
PARSE_NEW_VER_SCRIPTS[9006]="${PERL} -ne
For an example setup:
If my network is 192.168.1.0/24 and I have two mailservers at
192.168.1.2 and 192.168.1.3, I could set it up two different ways.
Individually:
trusted_networks 192.168.1.2
trusted_networks 192.168.1.3
Or the entire network:
trusted_networks 192.168.1.
My ISP m
> But what is my internal network. I have one server in cologne.
ping from the SA machine.
Loren
32 matches
Mail list logo
