Re: Ohya

I am too smart for this list i see :) Back to learning to read emails 101. jdow wrote: From: "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At 11:40 PM 1/7/2006, you wrote: Suggest you check the list archives. JDOW is a very frequent poster. JDOW knows of what he/she speaks. Uhhh isn't that what I sa

Re: Ohya

From: "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At 11:40 PM 1/7/2006, you wrote: Suggest you check the list archives. JDOW is a very frequent poster. JDOW knows of what he/she speaks. Uhhh isn't that what I said? There was a madness to my method, too. It was brief enough it inspired comment. It'll b

Re: Ohya

From: "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At 11:30 PM 1/7/2006, you wrote: I love how a list devoted to "spam filters" get spammed. I feel so warm and fuzzy. The spammers are laughing now I can hear it. "JDOW" has posted to the list before. I initially thought it was spam too, but note the "sl

Re: Ohya

At 11:40 PM 1/7/2006, you wrote: Suggest you check the list archives. JDOW is a very frequent poster. JDOW knows of what he/she speaks. Uhhh isn't that what I said?

Re: Ohya

Evan Platt wrote: At 11:30 PM 1/7/2006, you wrote: I love how a list devoted to "spam filters" get spammed. I feel so warm and fuzzy. The spammers are laughing now I can hear it. "JDOW" has posted to the list before. I initially thought it was spam too, but note the "slips past the filter

Re: Ohya

At 11:30 PM 1/7/2006, you wrote: I love how a list devoted to "spam filters" get spammed. I feel so warm and fuzzy. The spammers are laughing now I can hear it. "JDOW" has posted to the list before. I initially thought it was spam too, but note the "slips past the filters" added. I think i

Re: Ohya

I love how a list devoted to "spam filters" get spammed. I feel so warm and fuzzy. The spammers are laughing now I can hear it. jdow wrote: ===8<--- Make it happen! Here : www.rektoky ,ohya add .com ^_^ ===8<--- Slips past the filters. {^_^}

Ohya

===8<--- Make it happen! Here : www.rektoky ,ohya add .com ^_^ ===8<--- Slips past the filters. {^_^}

Use of uninitialized value

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've seen a couple of these this evening after installing a new mobo and processor. I may have missed it if this was discussed since last Wednesday since I've been down and using a friends windows laptop for mail. And after seeing 300+ messages com

Pill spammers using image only, no URI

FWIW The following spam had no URI, just some hashbuster(?) text and an image with the spammer domain ( inchoice dot net ) only in the (obscene) image. In that sense it's perhaps following in the footsteps of the image-only stock spams. __ Received: from tvenster.nl (pool-71-112-152-77.sttlwa.d

Re: Kinda O/T: Block Return-Path: <> mail?

Evan Platt a écrit : > I'm getting quite a bit of spam with > Return-Path: <> > in the headers. > > Will I likely see valid e-mail with this? Searching my previous mail, it > appears to all be bounce warnings. > > If so, what's the best way to just blackhole this? I have postfix, and put > /Retur

Re: FUZZY_MORTGAGE misfire.

Rob Skedgell a écrit : > On Saturday 07 January 2006 15:52, mouss wrote: > [...] > >>>k/weath er/europe/uk/ukforecast.html> > > > They may have a problem since that page might qualify as an open > redirector (the content goe

Re: FUZZY_MORTGAGE misfire.

On Saturday 07 January 2006 15:52, mouss wrote: [...] > > k/weath er/europe/uk/ukforecast.html> They may have a problem since that page might qualify as an open redirector (the content goes to a frame, rather than replacing th

Re: URIBLFP? [Was: SA or Commercial AntiSpam products]

I believe it is good practice to periodically lookup one's IPs and domains in dnsbl/rhsbl/uribl/surbl/... This will help reporting false positives, and may also help detecting real problems (you could get infos on who is abusing your system/network/site for instance). Yes,in fact we continue to

Re: FUZZY_MORTGAGE misfire.

Matt Kettler a écrit : > At 08:09 PM 1/6/2006, Craig McLean wrote: > >> The attached message was nailed to the tune of 3.7 points by >> FUZZY_MORTGAGE. Unfortunately it's a legit opt-in mailing, and appears >> to have triggered the rule because a URL containing the word "mortgage" >> got split acr

Re: URIBLFP? [Was: SA or Commercial AntiSpam products]

Jeff Peng a écrit : > I agree with Track. you mean Paul:) In fact all popular email service providers including > hotmail,yahoo or our 163.com and 126.com in China,are heavily abused by > spammers.So we'll try our best and spend much time and money to get rid > of spams.And,because of some number

Re: Default score for UPPERCASE_75_100

Please don't use Reply if you're not replying. It makes a mess of the threading. In Thunderbird I right-clicked on a prior mail to the list and chose Compose Mail To, which starts a new mail, not a reply. So probably is something in your setup if it is showing otherwise. That's odd, though

Re: [exim] Exim 4.60 and Spamassassin 3.0.4 time out problems

FYI That should have said NOW seeing timeouts.if I wasn't seeing them I wouldn't have a problem :) That's what I get for working late. George >On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 22:10:13 -0600, you wrote: >Hello: > >Just upgraded to 4.60 here with Spamassassin 3.0.4 and all seems to >work OK with the ex

Re: FUZZY_MORTGAGE misfire.

From: "Craig McLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear list, The attached message was nailed to the tune of 3.7 points by FUZZY_MORTGAGE. Unfortunately it's a legit opt-in mailing, and appears to have triggered the rule because a URL containing the word "mort

RE: URIBLFP? [Was: SA or Commercial AntiSpam products]

I agree with Track.In fact all popular email service providers including hotmail,yahoo or our 163.com and 126.com in China,are heavily abused by spammers.So we'll try our best and spend much time and money to get rid of spams.And,because of some numbers of spams,someone think that Netease's IP

RE: URIBLFP? [Was: SA or Commercial AntiSpam products]

>> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 1:31 PM >> To: mouss >> Cc: Jeff Peng; users@spamassassin.apache.org >> Subject: Re: URIBLFP? [Was: SA or Commercial AntiSpam products] >> >> mouss wrote: >> > (top posting because