From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Monday 02 January 2006 23:22, jdow wrote:
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Monday 02 January 2006 22:34, Craig White wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 22:19 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 01 January 2006 22:51, jdow wrote:
[...]
>> An
On Monday 02 January 2006 23:22, jdow wrote:
>From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> On Monday 02 January 2006 22:34, Craig White wrote:
>>>On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 22:19 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 01 January 2006 22:51, jdow wrote:
[...]
>> Anyway, the rule thats
On Monday 02 January 2006 23:16, jdow wrote:
>From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> On Monday 02 January 2006 00:50, Chris Purves wrote:
>>>On Sunday 01 January 2006 12:24, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 31 December 2005 20:21, Chris Purves wrote:
>On Sun, January 1, 2006 3:28 am
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 20:16 -0800, jdow wrote:
> From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Fetchmail is verbatim in the sense needed. Does fetchmail go through
> the tool that fires off SpamAssassin or is this done up in KMail as
> it reads? If so KMail may have sanitized off headers in much the
Gene Heskett wrote:
In that event, how do I go about telling fetchmail that the mailfile it
generates in /var/spool/mail/gene is to be a verbatum copy of what was
sucked in the vz's server. My fetchmailrc is comparatively clean,
with no options that I know about set that would encourage the
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Monday 02 January 2006 22:34, Craig White wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 22:19 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 01 January 2006 22:51, jdow wrote:
[...]
>> Anyway, the rule thats applying the 3.8 score is
>> HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2.
>>
>> ATM, I have
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 22:57 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> >to my knowledge, fetchmail doesn't remove any headers at all.
> > Procmail may be doing it or your MTA, depending upon how you are
> > handling it.
> >
> Humm, AFAIK, fetchmail gets it from vz, writing it
> to /var/spool/mail/gene
From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Monday 02 January 2006 00:50, Chris Purves wrote:
On Sunday 01 January 2006 12:24, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 31 December 2005 20:21, Chris Purves wrote:
>On Sun, January 1, 2006 3:28 am, Gene Heskett said:
>> On Saturday 31 December 2005 13:38,
On Monday 02 January 2006 22:34, Craig White wrote:
>On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 22:19 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Sunday 01 January 2006 22:51, jdow wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> >> Anyway, the rule thats applying the 3.8 score is
>> >> HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2.
>> >>
>> >> ATM, I have a "grep -R HELO_DYNAMIC_
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 22:19 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 01 January 2006 22:51, jdow wrote:
> [...]
>
> >> Anyway, the rule thats applying the 3.8 score is
> >> HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2.
> >>
> >> ATM, I have a "grep -R HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2 *" running from /
> >> because that rule isn't pres
On Sunday 01 January 2006 22:51, jdow wrote:
[...]
>> Anyway, the rule thats applying the 3.8 score is
>> HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2.
>>
>> ATM, I have a "grep -R HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2 *" running from /
>> because that rule isn't present in any of the
>> .spamassassin(/rulesdujour) or /etc/mail/spamassas
On Monday 02 January 2006 00:50, Chris Purves wrote:
>On Sunday 01 January 2006 12:24, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Saturday 31 December 2005 20:21, Chris Purves wrote:
>> >On Sun, January 1, 2006 3:28 am, Gene Heskett said:
>> >> On Saturday 31 December 2005 13:38, Rick Macdougall wrote:
>> >>>Gene H
On Sunday, January 1, 2006, 1:46:40 PM, Markus Mayer wrote:
> Now it seems to be sites hosted
> somewhere in China, with arbitrary domain-names. I have been getting
> more and more of those lately. They slip right through Spamassassin
> with very low spam-scores.
Do you have SURBLs enabled? Most
Happy New Year!
I just installed spamassassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on a debian box.
Everything appears to be running OK, except these incessant errors:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt(>) at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/DB_File.pm
line 271.
I have googled to no avail. Probably, there is somethi
On Monday, January 2, 2006 at 6:50:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
> You did have the latest version Duane.
> I guess MySQL 4.1 doesn't care if you have the "WHERE" clause after it;
> as I have been using the updated version for sometime and have not
> received any errors. But MySQL 5.0
You did have the latest version Duane.
I guess MySQL 4.1 doesn't care if you have the "WHERE" clause after it;
as I have been using the updated version for sometime and have not
received any errors. But MySQL 5.0, apparently, doesn't like that
syntax. I removed the WHERE clause and tested it
Matt Kettler escreveu:
Are the offending tests combined queries like SBL/XBL, NJABL or the like?
If so, instert a score 0 statement for the unscored parent rule (the
one with a double underscore at the start of it's name in the dnsbl
config file) and it should disable the query.
Disabli
At 01:33 PM 1/2/2006, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
Hello Guys,
I'm using SA 3.1.0 and i'd like to make some questions about using
RBLs with spamassassin.
SA is configured and running just fine. It's being called from
amavisd. That's not the problem, it's working fine.
M
Hello Guys,
I'm using SA 3.1.0 and i'd like to make some questions about using
RBLs with spamassassin.
SA is configured and running just fine. It's being called from
amavisd. That's not the problem, it's working fine.
My question is related to RBL using. I have disabled the
'l
I am running MySQL 5.0 and WAS receiving an error for the SQL
statement that had the 'ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE'. After doing a little
investigation and looking into the MySQL docs I have fixed the issue.
I dropped the entire WHERE from the statement. According to MySQL
docs, there is
[shifting to users@ since it's not a dev@ issue]
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 07:31:45PM -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
> Actually, while he phrased the RFE in terms of sa-learn, it is actually
> something that could be done as an SA plugin, if SA were run on the
> spamtrap.
Sure, it'd be pretty trivial t
On Monday, January 2, 2006 at 3:56:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
> At 10:00 PM 1/1/2006, Duane Hill wrote:
>>Hello All,
>>
>>I have e-mail accounts that have been sending Spam to a specific
>>e-mail address as an attachment for some time now. Before they were
>>manually gone t
>...
>I want to be able to assign spam-scores based on the country/countries
>hosting the web-server (or servers) mentioned in the body of an e-mail
>(if there are any links in the mail).
>
>I want to assign a spam-score of say 4.0, if the a mail contains a URI
>that resolves to a server in Chin
Hi, I have installed spamassassin with amavis and postfix. I also created a
dir where I put all the spam mails that spamassassin dont mark as spam in
order to run the sa-learn script hourly.
Our corporate email client is Outlook 2000/2003 and since Outlook add some
kind of header I am not sure if
Just reviewed the spam that passed through our amavisd-new + SA3.1.0
barrier and noticed something funny at the bottom of a message:
This email has been sent with an unregistered version of MaxBulk Mailer.
MaxBulk Mailer is a new easy-to-use mail merge software for Macintosh.
This message cam
I'm getting the errormessage below;
Who can help ?
Wolfgang
Jan 2 09:25:58 saxophon spamd[13330]:
spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 40156
Jan 2 09:25:58 saxophon spamd[13330]:
spamd: checking message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for exim:502
Jan 2 09:26:00 saxophon spamd[13330]:
inte
26 matches
Mail list logo
