> SquirrelMail sets "User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4" and not "x-mailer".
>
> Either way, I wouldn't trust mail from anyone using SquirrelMail. It's
> "webmail for nuts" after all.
>
I use Squirrelmail, and I love it :) It's my own little personal
setup, so there's only a few of us using it, whic
I have updated the INSERT code to use the "ON DUPLICATE KEY" feature of
MySQL. This feature insures that if the insert statement is executed
and another insert has already occurred for the changing day, an update
will take place instead. Hopefully, this will alleviate the largest
possibility of
Hello all,
Just to tie up the loose ends on this, I worked away on what
spamassassin debug was telling me and finally I came to the
conclusion that DNS was working, but just not quickly enough. I could
run, for example,
spamassassin -D < testmsg
three times in a row and it would do URIBL
On Sat, December 31, 2005 8:56 am, alex said:
> Sometimes simple is good, I've found when the message is
> from x-mailer=thebat or squirrelmail for example it is
> probably spam.
SquirrelMail sets "User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4" and not "x-mailer".
Either way, I wouldn't trust mail from anyone u
At 07:56 PM 12/30/2005, alex wrote:
Sometimes simple is good, I've found when the message is
from x-mailer=thebat or squirrelmail for example it is
probably spam.
Not to be rude, but that's rather stupid...
Both squirrelmail and thebat are uncommon mailers, but there's plenty of
those who us
From: "analyzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Matt Kettler schrieb:
At 06:51 AM 12/30/2005, analyzer wrote:
hanks four your help. My provider had updated the system. Now
spamassassin 3.0.8 is install and it run fine.
3.0.8?
Sry, my mistake 3.0.3.
Provider screwed up again. 3.0.4 is the one tha
Nope. I personally use the professional version of TheBat! It is quite
nice in what you can do with filtering. Extremely feature rich.
On Saturday, December 31, 2005 at 2:00:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
> oops, I thought only spammers used those mailers
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 01:07:
From: "Robert Kidd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 06:11 PM 12/29/2005, Robert Menschel wrote:
__
RK> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4
RK> OS Linux Red Hat (I think)
RK> Is there a way to get SpamAssassin to send all suspected spam to a
RK> specific email address? I do not want t
From: "analyzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Matt Kettler schrieb:
At 06:51 AM 12/30/2005, analyzer wrote:
hanks four your help. My provider had updated the system. Now
spamassassin 3.0.8 is install and it run fine.
3.0.8?
Sry, my mistake 3.0.3.
Provider screwed up again. 3.0.4 is the one tha
At 06:11 PM 12/29/2005, Robert Menschel wrote:
__
RK> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4
RK> OS Linux Red Hat (I think)
RK> Is there a way to get SpamAssassin to send all suspected spam to a
RK> specific email address? I do not want to download any spam but I
would
RK> like
oops, I thought only spammers used those mailers
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 01:07:10AM +, Craig McLean wrote:
> Just FYI, if you tried that here you'd hit 4 spam (from corpus of 1350)
> and 8 ham (from 4936) for squirrelmail and 6 spam/51 ham for thebat.
>
> Kind Regards,
> C.
> - --
> Craig McL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
alex wrote:
> Sometimes simple is good, I've found when the message is
> from x-mailer=thebat or squirrelmail for example it is
> probably spam.
>
Just FYI, if you tried that here you'd hit 4 spam (from corpus of 1350)
and 8 ham (from 4936) for squir
Sometimes simple is good, I've found when the message is
from x-mailer=thebat or squirrelmail for example it is
probably spam.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:30:39PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Really, this isn't a very good question for the SpamAssassin sorts. We're
> usually more interested in more
> from. Does anyone have a list of the most common subjects for spams?
> Possibly if someone can do an export if they have time of the top subjects
> that are flagged as spam?
AOL apparently just posted a "top 10" list for spam subjects. Of the 10
listed, only one of them would have been anywher
On 12/30/2005 09:15 pm, Jerry wrote:
> My mail program also has the ability to filter out messages before they are
> delivered based on who it is from, subject, and server it was delivered
> from. Does anyone have a list of the most common subjects for spams?
> Possibly if someone can do an export
Jerry wrote:
> My mail program also has the ability to filter out messages before they
> are delivered based on who it is from, subject, and server it was
> delivered from. Does anyone have a list of the most common subjects for
> spams? Possibly if someone can do an export if they have time of th
My mail program also has the ability to filter out messages before they are
delivered based on who it is from, subject, and server it was delivered
from. Does anyone have a list of the most common subjects for spams?
Possibly if someone can do an export if they have time of the top subjects
th
We keep occasionally (once a day or two) hitting an infinite loop in
spamd 3.1.0 where the process fails to terminate. We find that after a
while some resource is used up and the system stops accepting new spamd
connections. The process accumulates run time, but is not running at
100% of th
Matt Kettler schrieb:
At 06:51 AM 12/30/2005, analyzer wrote:
hanks four your help. My provider had updated the system. Now
spamassassin 3.0.8 is install and it run fine.
3.0.8?
Sry, my mistake 3.0.3.
From: Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: MIMEHeader plugin doesn't seem to be working
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:30:18 -0500
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 11:42:26AM +0900, MATSUDA Yoh-ichi wrote:
> > > > [29490] info: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line,
> > > > "MIMETXTUSASCII C
At 06:51 AM 12/30/2005, analyzer wrote:
hanks four your help. My provider had updated the system. Now spamassassin
3.0.8 is install and it run fine.
3.0.8?
On Wednesday, December 28, 2005, 9:15:02 AM, Obantec Support wrote:
> if i enable spamcop i find a lot of my ADSL customers (not on my IP's) are
> blocked. i use sbl-xbl but the IP's so far seem to have gotten thru.
You could use something like smtp authentication to allow (only)
them onto a mail
Gary V schrieb:
You might try to manually install a little older version of Net::DNS
cd /usr/local/src
wget http://www.net-dns.org/download/Net-DNS-0.48.tar.gz
tar xzvf Net-DNS-0.48.tar.gz
cd Net-DNS-0.48
perl Makefile.PL
Do you want to enable these tests? [y] n
make
make test
make install
23 matches
Mail list logo
