Re: Fetchmail and SA?

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In an older episode (Monday, 28. November 2005 18:25), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well Im using qmail with vpopmail, does that make a difference? Maybe http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#pop-imap-clients says everything you need to know. cheers, wolfgang Tha

Re: Fetchmail and SA?

>> In an older episode (Monday, 28. November 2005 18:25), >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> wrote: >> >> >>> Well Im using qmail with vpopmail, does that make a difference? >> >> Maybe >> http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#pop-imap-clients >> says everything you need to know. >> >> cheers, >> >> wolfgang

Re: Fetchmail and SA?

> In an older episode (Monday, 28. November 2005 18:25), > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > >> Well Im using qmail with vpopmail, does that make a difference? > > Maybe > http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#pop-imap-clients > says everything you need to know. > > cheers, > > wolfgang > Thanks! So

Re: Report SpamAssassing/Qmail-scanner activity ?

Noc Phibee wrote: > Hi > > a small question : > > Do you know if they have a utility for create a entry into mrtg > for count spamassassin result ? > > For exemple: Per day: >Email received >Email tagged by spamassassin >Email with Virus > ...you mean like qs2mrtg that's in the ./contri

Re: 3.1: config: not parsing, administrator setting: loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF

At 05:14 PM 11/28/2005, Thomas Mueller wrote: Hi, I've created a backport of the Debian Sid package for Sarge that works very well except for three error messages: Nov 28 22:53:42 geht-schon spamd[25072]: config: not parsing, administrator setting: loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF Nov

Re: Fetchmail and SA?

In an older episode (Monday, 28. November 2005 18:25), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Well Im using qmail with vpopmail, does that make a difference? Maybe http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#pop-imap-clients says everything you need to know. cheers, wolfgang

Re: Use of uninitialized value in string eq...

On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 06:02:11PM -0500, Bob wrote: > Use of uninitialized value in string eq at > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/Mail/SpamAssassin/EvalTests.pm line > 2671, line 323. > > Is there some way to fix this or is it really anything I should concern > myself with? Thanks in advan

Use of uninitialized value in string eq...

Hello, Novice user here and I am not sure this is a problem or if I should worry about it. Spamassassin seems to be working fine in all respects. However, whenever spamassassin works over a message, my maillog file displays the following message: Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /usr/lo

3.1: config: not parsing, administrator setting: loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF

Hi, I've created a backport of the Debian Sid package for Sarge that works very well except for three error messages: Nov 28 22:53:42 geht-schon spamd[25072]: config: not parsing, administrator setting: loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF Nov 28 22:53:42 geht-schon spamd[25072]: config: fa

Re: Fetchmail and SA?

From: "Mike Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I saw a post earlier today about using fetchmail to grab external emails and run them through your local SA filters. Can anyone explains or point me in the right direction to find out how to do that? I would like to use fetchmail to get mail from an ex

Re: Improving sa

hey andy, sa is really a great piece of software. i would highly recommend a book and some serious reading. sounds like you need to fine tune sa. and that is one of the great things about sa, you can configure it to your needs. shane - Original Message - From: "Andy Pieters" <[EMA

RE: Fetchmail and SA?

From: Mike Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I saw a post earlier today about using fetchmail to grab external > > emails and run them through your local SA filters. Can anyone > > explains or point me in the right direction to find out how to do > > that? > > > > I would like to use fetchma

Java Pop3 Proxy

Based on the feedback I recieved from this I am going to make a project based on this. So you if you have use for a program that prefilters pop3 mail through spam assassin send me an email. I am looking for Beta testers. Send me private email if you are interested. This of course asks the quest

Re: Improving sa

Andy Pieters wrote on Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:01:44 +0100: > What can I do to increase effectiveness of spamassassin in diffrentiating > spam > from ham? Use SARE rules/ rulesdujour and drop as many mail as you can on MTA level (If you run an MTA). Your FP rate of 10% is not acceptable at all, it

RE: Fetchmail and SA?

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > From: Mike Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > I would like to use fetchmail to get mail from an external server > >> > and have it run through my servers filters and deliver it to my > >> > mailbox here on this server. How would I

RE: Fetchmail and SA?

> From: Mike Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > I saw a post earlier today about using fetchmail to grab external >> > emails and run them through your local SA filters. Can anyone >> > explains or point me in the right direction to find out how to do >> > that? >> > >> > I would like to us

RE: is teaching SA ham it already marked as ham bad?

From: JamesDR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Mike Pepe wrote: > > I've been feeding messages from my inbox into a folder that SA > > reads as ham for quite some time now. > > > > Suddenly it occurs to me that this may be a bad idea, and I should > > only have SA learn messages as ham that it belie

RE: Improving sa

From: Andy Pieters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Second, it seems that spamassassin vs spam is nothing less then an > arms-race, with spamassassin perpetually running behind. Yes, and the same is true of anti-virus programs. > > As more and more rules are added, doesn't it come to a point where

Re: Improving sa

On Monday 28 November 2005 Andy Pieters wrote > > Right now, there's about 10% of all messages that come in on a > > day > > (4.500) that are injustly marked as ham or spam (10% is not a lot, but > > still > > 45 messages each day!) On Monday 28 November 2005 17:31, Mike Jackson wrote: > Uh, wou

Re: spamd proccesses

sounds like the same problem I and a lot of other users have had. Its the apache forking mechanism which may be the issue here. Try applying the --round-robin CL switch to the way you start the daemon.. Ronan

Re: Fetchmail and SA?

I saw a post earlier today about using fetchmail to grab external emails and run them through your local SA filters. Can anyone explains or point me in the right direction to find out how to do that? I would like to use fetchmail to get mail from an external server and have it run through my serv

Re: Improving sa

When manually applying the filters "Mark as SPAM" or "Mark as HAM", which pipe the message to the command sa-learn --spam or sa-learn --ham respectively, it takes up to a minute to process on a PIV 4.3Ghz HT with 1Gb of RAM, which seems like ages. I've noticed that the SQL backends to Bayes an

Fetchmail and SA?

I saw a post earlier today about using fetchmail to grab external emails and run them through your local SA filters. Can anyone explains or point me in the right direction to find out how to do that? I would like to use fetchmail to get mail from an external server and have it run through my serve

Re: Blacklist rule

Robert Swan wrote: > An e-mail I received had this rule on it and I am not sure why, the from > address was not in my “blacklist_from”. can anybody point me in the > right direction? Don't just check the From: address. SA checks the Return-path: and other sender related headers too. Check them all

Blacklist rule

An e-mail I received had this rule on it and I am not sure why, the from address was not in my “blacklist_from”. can anybody point me in the right direction?     Content analysis details:   (95.6 points, 5.0 required)    pts rule name  description

spamd proccesses

Hello all I have a quick question. I have recently upgraded to spamassassin v3.1.0  from 3.0.6 and prior to the upgrade I had maybe 5 spamd proccesses running and now there is only 3, 2 running under the user “filter” and one runnign under the user “root” , also it takes about 30 minutes t

Re: Report SpamAssassing/Qmail-scanner activity ?

Noc Phibee wrote: > Hi > > a small question : > > Do you know if they have a utility for create a entry into mrtg > for count spamassassin result ? you might want to use munin instead of mrtg, it comes with spamassassin monitoring preconfigured... and it does other useful monitors as well. bye

Re: How effective is it?

Andy Pieters wrote: > On Sunday 27 November 2005 22:59, Steven Stern wrote: > >>sa-learn --spam --mbox /home/*/mail/should-be-spam >>sa-learn --ham --mbox /home/*/mail/should-be-ham > > > Isn't this dangerous? I mean, what if a user saves a message with the name > "|passwd -d" (without quotes)

RE: Anti-virus strategy

From: Kenneth Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --On Wednesday, November 23, 2005 10:07 AM -0500 Bowie Bailey > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have Clam installed with all the default options and I run > > freshclam a few times a day to keep it updated. It just works. > > If you use the

Re: unsuscribe

At 01:40 AM 11/28/2005, you wrote: unsuscribe As the headers of evey message say... list-unsubscribe:

Re: is teaching SA ham it already marked as ham bad?

Mike Pepe wrote: I've been feeding messages from my inbox into a folder that SA reads as ham for quite some time now. Suddenly it occurs to me that this may be a bad idea, and I should only have SA learn messages as ham that it believes is spam. This strikes me as being as bad as forcing SA

is teaching SA ham it already marked as ham bad?

I've been feeding messages from my inbox into a folder that SA reads as ham for quite some time now. Suddenly it occurs to me that this may be a bad idea, and I should only have SA learn messages as ham that it believes is spam. This strikes me as being as bad as forcing SA to re-learn spam a

Re: How effective is it?

On Sunday 27 November 2005 22:59, Steven Stern wrote: > sa-learn --spam --mbox /home/*/mail/should-be-spam > sa-learn --ham --mbox /home/*/mail/should-be-ham Isn't this dangerous? I mean, what if a user saves a message with the name "|passwd -d" (without quotes) It would get executed then as s

Report SpamAssassing/Qmail-scanner activity ?

Hi a small question : Do you know if they have a utility for create a entry into mrtg for count spamassassin result ? For exemple: Per day: Email received Email tagged by spamassassin Email with Virus Thanks bye

Improving sa

Hi list I have been using spamassassin for over a year now in combination with Kmail. First, some observations When manually applying the filters "Mark as SPAM" or "Mark as HAM", which pipe the message to the command sa-learn --spam or sa-learn --ham respectively, it takes up to a minute to pr

automating spam handling

Hi, i want to automate my spam handling a bit further. here's what i got by now: - fetchmail gets mails from various pop3 accounts, injects into local mail system (postfix) - postfix pushes mail through clamsmtp and then through spamassassin - mail gets delivered into local cyrus imap which pu

unsuscribe

unsuscribe