Re: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice?

2005-11-08 Thread Dhawal Doshy
email builder wrote: In-memory storage: All data stored in each data node is kept in memory on the node's host computer. For each data node in the cluster, you must have available an amount of RAM equal to the size of the database times the number of replicas, This refers to the first line: "In

RE: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice?

2005-11-08 Thread Gary W. Smith
Sorry, only answered part of the question. My users are quite happy with overall markup of the spam. We occasionally get a HAM marked as SPAM. We have an odd client base though. -Original Message- From: email builder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 8:58 PM

RE: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice?

2005-11-08 Thread Gary W. Smith
Default. Gart -Original Message- From: email builder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 8:58 PM To: Gary W. Smith; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice? > Our production database for a large number of emails (but using si

Re: More spam getting through

2005-11-08 Thread Loren Wilton
> I'm not sure if Loren's rules made it into any particular > ruleset or if Leo "morph"'d too often to bother; Maybe someone They were in specific.cf as I recall. Yes, they were in there, and yes, Leo tended to get around them every few days. A couple of them are still there and still hit occas

RE: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice?

2005-11-08 Thread email builder
> Our production database for a large number of emails (but using site > wide) is about 40mb. What is your bayes_expiry_max_db_size set to? Do you feel that it has been enough to effectively capture your various user email habits? __ Start you

Re: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice?

2005-11-08 Thread email builder
> > In-memory storage: > > All data stored in each data node is kept in memory on the node's > > host computer. For each data node in the cluster, you must have > > available an amount of RAM equal to the size of the database times > > the number of replicas, > > This refers to the first line: "I

Re: More spam getting through

2005-11-08 Thread Loren Wilton
> If anyone can formulate a regex to catch these letters in any order, while avoiding a > repeating sequence like "A A A A A ", it would make this a safer rule. SARE has quite a number of rules specifically to catch these table drug spams. Loren

Re: Habeas?

2005-11-08 Thread Martin Schröder
On 2005-11-08 17:37:01 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > Actually, more to the point.. Habeas doesn't use or support plain-SWE anymore. Thanks. Habeas didn't bother to tell their "customers". Best Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de

RE: More spam getting through

2005-11-08 Thread List Mail User
>... >From: List Mail User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >... >> >I'm running SA 3.1 and I have started to notice more spam come through >> >recently. >> >[snip - original table drug spam] >> > >> >Has anyone else been having this problem? Any rules to catch medication >> >names in those types

Re: More spam getting through

2005-11-08 Thread Chris
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 08:57 am, Bowie Bailey wrote: > I'm running SA 3.1 and I have started to notice more spam come through > recently. > > Some are porn and some are medication. They don't hit much of anything > beyond Razor2 and Chickenpox, which isn't enough to mark them as spam. > > Som

Re: [OTAnn] Feedback

2005-11-08 Thread jdow
Roomity.com -> Spammer list. No more mail from this site. It takes a REALLY stupid spammer to try this sort of . {^_-} - Original Message - From: "shenanigans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: 2005 November, 08, Tuesday 08:38 Subject: [OTAnn] Feedback I was interested in getting feedba

Re: Habeas?

2005-11-08 Thread Matt Kettler
Matt Kettler wrote: > Martin Schröder wrote: > >>On 2005-11-08 14:04:27 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: >> >> >>>It's a DNS based test now, so you need Net::DNS installed and network tests >>>enabled... >> >> >>Why? >> >>Best >>Martin (whose mails are Habeas SWE) > > > SA 3.1.0 does NOT use the p

Re: Habeas?

2005-11-08 Thread Matt Kettler
Martin Schröder wrote: > On 2005-11-08 14:04:27 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > >>It's a DNS based test now, so you need Net::DNS installed and network tests >>enabled... > > > Why? > > Best > Martin (whose mails are Habeas SWE) SA 3.1.0 does NOT use the plain habeas SWE anymore. Period. SA

Re: child processing timeout

2005-11-08 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Ronan wrote: Justin Mason wrote: These are totally new ;) If you can track down a message that causes this, a bug report would be welcome. - --j. Are you looking for an example message or just headers or what? If you let me know ill have a hoke around and get one for ya! Whatever trigg

Re: Habeas?

2005-11-08 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:45:26PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote: > > It's a DNS based test now, so you need Net::DNS installed and network tests > > enabled... > > Why? > Martin (whose mails are Habeas SWE) In the same way that sending mail to spamassassin-users@incubator.apache.org has been

Re: Habeas?

2005-11-08 Thread Martin Schröder
On 2005-11-08 14:04:27 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > It's a DNS based test now, so you need Net::DNS installed and network tests > enabled... Why? Best Martin (whose mails are Habeas SWE) -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de

Re: Qmail question..

2005-11-08 Thread Aiko Barz
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote: > Qmail is dead. Concider something that is still getting developed. My > preference is Postfix. I have to make sure that qmail and qmail-ldap won't get mixed up at this point. Bye, Aiko -- Aiko Barz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digi

RE: More spam getting through

2005-11-08 Thread Bowie Bailey
From: List Mail User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >... > >I'm running SA 3.1 and I have started to notice more spam come through > >recently. > > > >Some are porn and some are medication. They don't hit much of anything > >beyond Razor2 and Chickenpox, which isn't enough to mark them as spam. >

Re: Habeas?

2005-11-08 Thread Matt Kettler
Raul Dias wrote: > My bad. I grep the wrong dir. > > Do I need to enable it? > > It doesn't seem to be working here. > > ( and now that I said that I can't find a habeas message here to test > *grin*) > It's a DNS based test now, so you need Net::DNS installed and network tests enabled... Fo

Re: Qmail question..

2005-11-08 Thread Arvinn Løkkebakken
DAve wrote: Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote: Robert Leonard wrote: Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a windows guy so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is how to get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only SPECIFIC IP

Re: Habeas?

2005-11-08 Thread Raul Dias
My bad. I grep the wrong dir. Do I need to enable it? It doesn't seem to be working here. ( and now that I said that I can't find a habeas message here to test *grin*) Raul Dias On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 13:28 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: > Raul Dias wrote: > > Hi, > > > > What happened to Habeas

Re: Qmail question..

2005-11-08 Thread hamann . w
>> >> Rick Macdougall wrote: >> >> > Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote: >> > >> >> Robert Leonard wrote: >> >> >> >>> Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a >> >>> windows guy >> >>> so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is >> >>> how to >> >>> get qm

RE: [OTAnn] Feedback

2005-11-08 Thread List Mail User
>... >Duncan Hill wrote: >> On Tuesday 08 Nov 2005 16:38, shenanigans wrote: >>> I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users. >>> >>> We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a >>> more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of >>>

Re: Habeas?

2005-11-08 Thread Matt Kettler
Raul Dias wrote: > Hi, > > What happened to Habeas support in SA? > > More than a year ago there was a discussion about using habeas. > > There were patchs in there site (gone/broken link) and it would be > incorporated into SA 3.0.x. > > Now we have SA 3.1 and no sign of habeas support. > > I

Re: SA 3.1 reports in german

2005-11-08 Thread hamann . w
Hi, I recall that at some time I had to symlink some file to one with an @euro part in the name - but I am not exactly sure in which context Wolfgang Hamann >> >> Hi >> >> >> I would like to have SA generate German reports, not English reports.=20 >> >> Whatever I do either I'm getting no re

Re: More spam getting through

2005-11-08 Thread List Mail User
>... >I'm running SA 3.1 and I have started to notice more spam come through >recently. > >Some are porn and some are medication. They don't hit much of anything >beyond Razor2 and Chickenpox, which isn't enough to mark them as spam. > >Some of the medication spams are using an obnoxious html tabl

Re: Qmail question..

2005-11-08 Thread Jim Maul
Evan Platt wrote: At 09:39 AM 11/8/2005, you wrote: Thank you for your opinion. Consider learning to spell. There was, IMHO, nothing rude in Arvinn's post - just a suggestion to look at another product. Looking at Arvinn's name (Arvinn Løkkebakken), and a quick glance at the domain name

Habeas?

2005-11-08 Thread Raul Dias
Hi, What happened to Habeas support in SA? More than a year ago there was a discussion about using habeas. There were patchs in there site (gone/broken link) and it would be incorporated into SA 3.0.x. Now we have SA 3.1 and no sign of habeas support. Is it gone for good? Raul Dias

Re: [OTAnn] Feedback

2005-11-08 Thread Chris Thielen
Matt Kettler wrote: shenanigans wrote: I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users. We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of broadband. Roomity.com v 1.5 is a web 2.01 commun

Re: [OTAnn] Feedback

2005-11-08 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Kettler writes: > shenanigans wrote: > > I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users. > > > > We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a > > more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the

RE: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice?

2005-11-08 Thread Gary W. Smith
I'd also through www.linux-ha.org into the mix. We use that to manage the cluster for the SA database and use DRBD for the filesystem. We also use the same concept backend email stores as well. It's more open source to complement this open source. -Original Message- From: Michael Monn

RE: Qmail question..

2005-11-08 Thread Robert Leonard
Thanks for the tips! I had no intention of starting any type of debate.. Was simply looking for help. I'm a Microsoft guy who uses Linux as a tool, a tool that frustrates me to no end, yet I won't stoop to calling it names or comparing this vs. that.. Each has their place, and neither is perfect.

Re: Qmail question..

2005-11-08 Thread Evan Platt
At 09:39 AM 11/8/2005, you wrote: Thank you for your opinion. Consider learning to spell. There was, IMHO, nothing rude in Arvinn's post - just a suggestion to look at another product. Looking at Arvinn's name (Arvinn Løkkebakken), and a quick glance at the domain name (sandakerveien.net

Re: Qmail question..

2005-11-08 Thread Arvinn Løkkebakken
Rick Macdougall wrote: Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote: Robert Leonard wrote: Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a windows guy so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is how to get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only

Re: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice?

2005-11-08 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Dienstag, 8. November 2005 03:38 email builder wrote: > In-memory storage: > All data stored in each data node is kept in memory on the node's > host computer. For each data node in the cluster, you must have > available an amount of RAM equal to the size of the database times > the number of re

Re: Qmail question..

2005-11-08 Thread DAve
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote: Robert Leonard wrote: Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a windows guy so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is how to get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only SPECIFIC IP's.. I'm gettin

Re: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice?

2005-11-08 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Dienstag, 8. November 2005 03:50 email builder wrote: > From what I understand, MySQL cluster design is such that the data > nodes keep all the table data in memory, which would not be feasible > in a 160GB scenario... No. Cluster means: Take two machines of same config, and mirror them. It's

Re: Qmail question..

2005-11-08 Thread Rick Macdougall
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote: Robert Leonard wrote: Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a windows guy so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is how to get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only SPECIFIC IP's.. I'm gettin

Re: Qmail question..

2005-11-08 Thread Maurice Lucas
Robert Leonard wrote: Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a windows guy so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is how to get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only SPECIFIC IP's.. I'm getting flooded by mail coming from

Re: Qmail question..

2005-11-08 Thread DAve
Robert Leonard wrote: Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a windows guy so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is how to get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only SPECIFIC IP's.. I'm getting flooded by mail coming from

Re: Qmail question..

2005-11-08 Thread Jim Maul
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote: Robert Leonard wrote: Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a windows guy so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is how to get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only SPECIFIC IP's.. I'm gettin

Re: Qmail question..

2005-11-08 Thread Arvinn Løkkebakken
Robert Leonard wrote: Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a windows guy so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is how to get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only SPECIFIC IP's.. I'm getting flooded by mail coming from

Re: spamd error

2005-11-08 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:21:57PM -0500, Ryan O'Neil wrote: > What's the plugin for and how would I fix it? It'd be the Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF plugin, you could comment it out of the init.pre file and restart spamd. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "I'm at the age where food has taken th

RE: Qmail question..

2005-11-08 Thread Ryan O'Neil
http://www.qmailrocks.org/ -Original Message- From: Robert Leonard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:28 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Qmail question.. Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a windows guy so this is qui

Qmail question..

2005-11-08 Thread Robert Leonard
Can anybody point me to a good forum for Qmail? I'm a newb and a windows guy so this is quite the daunting thing! What I want to figure out is how to get qmail w/ tcpserver to allow incoming smtp connections from only SPECIFIC IP's.. I'm getting flooded by mail coming from places I shouldn't be ge

RE: spamd error

2005-11-08 Thread Ryan O'Neil
What's the plugin for and how would I fix it? -Original Message- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:18 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: spamd error On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:09:01PM -0500, Ryan O'Neil wrote: > I upgraded

Re: spamd error

2005-11-08 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:09:01PM -0500, Ryan O'Neil wrote: > I upgraded my net::dns the other day and restarted spamd after adding some > new rules today and I’m getting this message in my logs. > > I’m guessing it’s a perl error? It means you don't have Mail::SPF::Query installed. Disable the

spamd error

2005-11-08 Thread Ryan O'Neil
I upgraded my net::dns the other day and restarted spamd after adding some new rules today and I’m getting this message in my logs.   I’m guessing it’s a perl error?   Can't locate Mail/SPF/Query.pm in @INC (@INC contains: ../lib /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi /u

Re: [OTAnn] Feedback

2005-11-08 Thread Matt Kettler
shenanigans wrote: > I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users. > > We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a > more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of broadband. > > Roomity.com v 1.5 is a web 2.01 community webapp. Our

RE: [OTAnn] Feedback

2005-11-08 Thread Don Levey
Duncan Hill wrote: > On Tuesday 08 Nov 2005 16:38, shenanigans wrote: >> I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users. >> >> We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a >> more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of >> broadband.

Re: [OTAnn] Feedback

2005-11-08 Thread Duncan Hill
On Tuesday 08 Nov 2005 16:38, shenanigans wrote: > I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users. > > We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a more > aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of broadband. > > Roomity.com v 1.5 is a we

[OTAnn] Feedback

2005-11-08 Thread shenanigans
I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users.We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of broadband.Roomity.com v 1.5 is a web 2.01 community webapp. Our newest version adds broadcast vide

RE: SA 3.1 reports in german

2005-11-08 Thread Philipp Snizek
> > is there a parameter I have to use when starting "spamd -du user" ? > > > > I've searched Dr Google, the SA docs as well as the SA FAQ. > > > > There is no switch, you need to set the systems LANG > environment variable to change the language of the reports. thanx a lot. That works now.

Re: SA 3.1 reports in german

2005-11-08 Thread Matt Kettler
Philipp Snizek wrote: > Hi > > > I would like to have SA generate German reports, not English reports. > > Whatever I do either I'm getting no report (report template not found > - although in /etc/mail/spamassassin/10_misc.cf the report template is > defined with "lang de report blablabla") or

Question about Ident

2005-11-08 Thread lmarcilly
Hi all, i use Spamassassin with ProxSmtp and P3Scan. It works perfectly but i search more information about the --auth-ident option. I'am not sure but i think it won't work here since there is ProxSmtp and P3Scan, am i right? No, i would like to change spamassassin options according to the user

SA 3.1 reports in german

2005-11-08 Thread Philipp Snizek
Hi I would like to have SA generate German reports, not English reports. Whatever I do either I'm getting no report (report template not found - although in /etc/mail/spamassassin/10_misc.cf the report template is defined with "lang de report blablabla") or there's an English report in the emai

RE: More spam getting through

2005-11-08 Thread Pierre Thomson
Pierre Thomson wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: >> >> Some of the medication spams are using an obnoxious html table >> structure that makes the contents of each cell print vertically. >> >> For example: >> >> >> a d g >> b e h >> c f i >> >> <\tr> >> >> >> Th

RE: More spam getting through

2005-11-08 Thread Pierre Thomson
Bowie Bailey wrote: > > Some of the medication spams are using an obnoxious html table > structure that makes the contents of each cell print vertically. > > For example: > > > a d g > b e h > c f i > > <\tr> > > > This results in: > a b c > d e f > g h i >

More spam getting through

2005-11-08 Thread Bowie Bailey
I'm running SA 3.1 and I have started to notice more spam come through recently. Some are porn and some are medication. They don't hit much of anything beyond Razor2 and Chickenpox, which isn't enough to mark them as spam. Some of the medication spams are using an obnoxious html table structure

Spamassassin timeout

2005-11-08 Thread Richard Pijnenburg
Dear List, From time to time we have the problem that spamassasin is timingout. This only happens when we recieve alot of mail at once. Is there anything to do against it ? I'm running Postfix+cyrus+spamassasin+clamv+amavisd I hope someone can help me Nov 8 10:18:43 mail.premiumxs.nl /usr/loc

Re: child processing timeout

2005-11-08 Thread Ronan
Justin Mason wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ronan writes: getting quite a few of the following in the logs which are letting messages through unscanned. running a dedicated server serving 3 mtas. SA 3.1 MTA exim 4.54 Nov 3 03:05:44 dung spamd[11633]: spamd: bad pro