Finally got the kinks worked out in my SA-3.1 setup last week. Filtered
out over 420 spams -- maybe 1 false positive, and it was borderline.
The speed on sa-learn has dropped, but that may be unavoidable. But
I'm finally getting >= spam recognition than I had in 2.63.
I have no-online tests en
On Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2005 16:59 Chris Thielen wrote:
> If you would like, I can add your german rules to RDJ if they're
> available on a reasonably connected web site.
OK, I put it on
http://zmi.at/x/70_sare_german.cf
It's a 100mb/s connected server, if that's enough ;-)
For the RDJ page,
Fedora core 2 is probably out of maintenance cycle now. So upgrading
SpamAssassin may be a little difficult to do via yum without going to
FC3 or probably FC4. Of course, that has its downsides, too.
Save the configuration and Bayes databases you have now. (The Bayes
databases are the most awkwar
Hi,
even when I change the LANG setting to de_DE.ISO-8859-1 I get an english
report. What else could I do?
Regards
Christoph
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 28. Oktober 2005 16:51
An: Christoph Petersen
Cc: users@spamassassin.apac
I did a quick check of the server at the console.
I was incorrect before it's core 1 not 2
I think one our name servers is 2
-Original Message-
From: Chris Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 2:46 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SA for Fe
On Oct 28, 2005, at 2:35 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Friday, October 28, 2005 2:07 PM -0400 Ryan O'Neil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We currently have a fedora core 2 server running Sendmail,
SpamAssassin
2.63.
I'd like to upgrade to the newest version of SA 3.1.0 I'm aware that
some o
--On Friday, October 28, 2005 2:07 PM -0400 Ryan O'Neil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We currently have a fedora core 2 server running Sendmail, SpamAssassin
2.63.
I'd like to upgrade to the newest version of SA 3.1.0 I'm aware that
some of the user prefs and local.cf will need changed afterwards
Hi everyone, I’m not really a new mail admin but I’m
moving more into the role of supporting and upgrading our software on our
fedora server.
We currently have a fedora core 2 server running Sendmail,
SpamAssassin 2.63.
I’d like to upgrade to the newest version of SA 3.1.0
I’m aware
Joseph Malone wrote:
> I'm trying to write a rule that will add points if the e-mail is sent
> from outside the U.S. or Canada. Using countries.nerd.dk, the rule
> is supposed to add points to everything, than subtract the points if
> the e-mail came from the U.S. or Canada. However, I'm not sur
> I've created a custom SA rule for myself to block spams that contain URLs
> which aren't yet listed by SURBL or URIBL. My rule looks like this:
>
> uri BAD_URI/baddomain1\.com|baddomain2\.com|baddomain3\.com/i
> describe BAD_URIBody contains blacklisted URL
> score BAD_URI
I'm trying to write a rule that will add points if the e-mail is sent
from outside the U.S. or Canada. Using countries.nerd.dk, the rule is
supposed to add points to everything, than subtract the points if the
e-mail came from the U.S. or Canada. However, I'm not sure that it's
working. Can
Robert Bartlett wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:54 PM
To: Robert Bartlett
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Heavy queues?
Robert Bartlett wrote:
Have you looked at what the content of your queue is?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:54 PM
To: Robert Bartlett
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Heavy queues?
Robert Bartlett wrote:
>
> Have you looked at what the content of your queue is? Is it a lot of
bounce
I use the following spamd flags: -d -x -q -r pidfile
The -x is for ignoring userpref files. You are using -Q which is
similar to -q, both of which are supposed to be used with -x. This is
according to spamd's man file.
So my suggestion would be try adding -x to your spamd flags. Also I
don't k
Jon Schulman wrote:
> When I do a spamassassin --lint, I receive the following message:
>
> config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping:
> user_scores_sql_table userpref
...
> # Setup db vars to point to the MySQL prefs
> user_scores_dsn DBI:mysql:mail:localhost
Hello –
I am trying to manage a SpamAssassin implementation with a
MySQL backend for users to manage their own settings. I am running into some
strange problems with this, however.
When I do a spamassassin –lint, I receive the
following message:
config: SpamAssassin failed to
mouss wrote:
not better are the autoresponders that give me phone numbers and email
addresses when I'm just a foreign guy...
My "favorite" occured during a big virus outbreak last year. Someone
presumably received a virus message which had forged my return address,
because they sent me an ou
Christoph Petersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed a strange behaviour with SA 3.1 running on my debian machine.
> Before reboot every spamreport was on german. After reboot it was in
> english. How could I say spamassassin always to use the german report not
> the english one?
>
check out the sett
Hi,
I've noticed a strange behaviour with SA 3.1 running on my debian machine.
Before reboot every spamreport was on german. After reboot it was in
english. How could I say spamassassin always to use the german report not
the english one?
Regards
Christoph
Please can anyone explain the error messages below? (N.B each of the
known spam messages has been recently delivered without scoring 5 or over.)
--
$ spamassassin -r < known_spam_msg_a
DCC -> report failed: Exited with non-zero exit code 67
1 message(s) examined.
$ spamassassin -r < known_s
Hi all,
I've created a custom SA rule for myself to block spams that contain URLs
which aren't yet listed by SURBL or URIBL. My rule looks like this:
uri BAD_URI/baddomain1\.com|baddomain2\.com|baddomain3\.com/i
describe BAD_URIBody contains blacklisted URL
score BAD_URI5.
21 matches
Mail list logo
