Re: Spamd / RDJ

2005-10-05 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2005 22:09 Pierre Thomson wrote: > However, if this is a typical Linux system (RedHat, SuSE, etc.) the > init scripts are in located /etc/rc.d/init.d rather than just > /etc/init.d .  Perhaps this is your problem. /etc/init.d is correct at least for SUSE. /etc/rc.d/init.d i

Re: [SARE] rules update

2005-10-05 Thread Robert Menschel
SARE's URI rules files and HTML rules files have been updated. URI rules files were updated early this morning. They had a --lint error in them at first, but that has been corrected. The HTML files have been updated this evening (and may not be available for download for another 40-60 minutes).

Re: Spamd / RDJ

2005-10-05 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight.ie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > If you are using MailScanner you should _never_ run spamd/spamc > > Chris - you still need to run --lint on the SA rules. > > > The way to get MS working with RDJ is to make a minor change to the script >

Re: Spamd / RDJ

2005-10-05 Thread Chris Thielen
Michele Neylon :: Blacknight.ie wrote: Chris Thielen wrote: Hi Casey, Larry and Dhawal are correct, you shouldn't be restarting spamd if you don't use it (spamassassin --lint does NOT require spamd). I recommend changing SA_RESTART to a command that will restart MailScanner, or cause MailSc

Re: Spamd / RDJ

2005-10-05 Thread Michele Neylon :: Blacknight.ie
Chris Thielen wrote: > > Hi Casey, > > Larry and Dhawal are correct, you shouldn't be restarting spamd if you > don't use it (spamassassin --lint does NOT require spamd). I recommend > changing SA_RESTART to a command that will restart MailScanner, or cause > MailScanner to reload its config files

Re: Spamd / RDJ

2005-10-05 Thread Chris Thielen
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: Try editing /etc/rulesdujour/config and change what’s assigned to SA_RESTART, so that RDJ doesn’t try to restart spamd. Perhaps it should be restarting MailScanner instead, or run a do-nothing command.

RE: Spamd / RDJ

2005-10-05 Thread Rosenbaum, Larry M.
Try editing /etc/rulesdujour/config and change what’s assigned to SA_RESTART, so that RDJ doesn’t try to restart spamd.  Perhaps it should be restarting MailScanner instead, or run a do-nothing command.   From: Casey King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, Octobe

Re: Spamd / RDJ

2005-10-05 Thread Dhawal Doshy
Casey King writes: Because RDJ -lints SA, I have tried to create a cron job that would stop Spamd from running. I do not want it using up so much memory since MailScanner calls SA on its own. My crontab looks like this: [snip] Does anyone have another idea of what I can do to shutdown SA

RE: Spamd / RDJ

2005-10-05 Thread Pierre Thomson
Based on this crontab, cron.daily will run at 4:20 am every day, and "spamassassin stop" will run at 30 minutes past each hour; that is, once an hour.  However, if this is a typical Linux system (RedHat, SuSE, etc.) the init scripts are in located /etc/rc.d/init.d rather than just /etc/init.

Spamd / RDJ

2005-10-05 Thread Casey King
Because RDJ –lints SA, I have tried to create a cron job that would stop Spamd from running.  I do not want it using up so much memory since MailScanner calls SA on its own.  My crontab looks like this:   - SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin

Re: Sare URI ruleset

2005-10-05 Thread jdow
From: "guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please do not hijack unrelated threads. If you are posting to the list with a new topic, do not Reply to a post but rather send a new one. On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 10:04 -0600, Andrew Ott wrote: Got this report this morning from all 3 of my spamassassin serve

Re: Sare URI ruleset

2005-10-05 Thread guenther
Please do not hijack unrelated threads. If you are posting to the list with a new topic, do not Reply to a post but rather send a new one. On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 10:04 -0600, Andrew Ott wrote: > Got this report this morning from all 3 of my spamassassin servers, all > running 3.0 > > Is this rule

[SARE] Updated Spoof Set

2005-10-05 Thread Fred
Just a heads up we updated the spoof ruleset to include 33 new bank spoofs. Data collected from phish archive websites and suggestions from fellow users aided in this update. http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_spoof.cf Fred #357

Re: auto white-list spam points?

2005-10-05 Thread jdow
Auto whitelist works both directions. If it's seem spams from a source before it gets a spammish score while sources that showed ham tend to get hammish scores. See the wiki about it. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Matthew Lenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 requi

Sare URI ruleset

2005-10-05 Thread Andrew Ott
Got this report this morning from all 3 of my spamassassin servers, all running 3.0 Is this ruleset no longer supported for 3.0? === Lint output: warning: description for SARE_URI_GEOCIT_NUM is over 50 chars lint: 1 issues detected. please rerun with debug enabled for more inform

Re: auto white-list spam points?

2005-10-05 Thread Jørn-Morten Innselset
It's all somewhat explained here: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AwlWrongWay jm - Original Message - From: "Matthew Lenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Spamassassin Users" Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 4:43 PM Subject: auto white-list spam points? X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7

auto white-list spam points?

2005-10-05 Thread Matthew Lenz
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 X-Spam-Report: * 0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Isn't being in the the auto white-list a good thing? -Matt

SpamAssassin Rules/Scores groups

2005-10-05 Thread Mark Hennessy
I want to set up a general list of scores for many rules that can then be set as scores themselves. So for example, I want to have a rule called PORN_GROUP and then put a bunch of scores in for other rules: score INTERRUPTUS 4 score LIVE_PORN 1.5 score MALE_ENHANCE 4 . . . And then somehow set a

RE: After upgrading to 3.1

2005-10-05 Thread Muhammad Farooq Bhatti
Thanks Daniel Problem is solved. I downloaded from sunfreeware.com and installed it during "make test" some error occurs due to libraries which I copied to /lib and every things goes fine. Thanks again :) Best Regards, Muhammad Farooq Bhatti -Original Message- From: Daniel Acton

Re: Some rule files' PGP signatures are reported as "bad"

2005-10-05 Thread Ralph Seichter
Matt Yackley wrote: > EvilnumX.cf .sig files should be update shortly. I see these results: $ gpg --verify 70_sare_evilnum0.cf.sig gpg: Signature made Tue 04 Oct 2005 04:01:25 AM CEST using DSA key ID 1129F0D3 gpg: BAD signature from "Matt Yackley (SpamAssassin Rules Emporium) <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Some rule files' PGP signatures are reported as "bad"

2005-10-05 Thread Ralph Seichter
Robert Menschel wrote: > New signature files should be in distribution within the hour. I did not check all signatures because I don't use all SARE rule sets, but there is still at least one "bad" signature: $ gpg --verify 70_sare_obfu.cf.sig gpg: Signature made Sun 02 Oct 2005 04:31:30 AM