Thanks,
Stearns mail gives ground work, but the "bounce" requirement is not acceptable
as Lenz points out. Nor do sufficient enough people run imap (less than 1%).
Naturally this can be done, it is just complicated. Perhaps if I assume the spam
mails are always forwarded "inline" I can strip
I believe that only works with a redirect/bounce though and outlook express
doesn't support it. dunno about your users but with mine that represents
about 95% of the users. What about IMAP? If you have your users switch to
IMAP you can just have a Spam folder for each account. Can't think of
Good evening, Jorgen,
On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
I would assume someone has already solved this, but it seems hard to search
for.
I would like to setup SA site wide, so that all the users can use it.
However, users are not very technical, so it would be nice if they could have
Ralph Seichter said:
> Hi,
>
> first I want to thank you for keeping up all the good work and
> updating the rule files. Unfortunately, some of the PGP signatures
> don't seem to match their rule files (i.e. 70_sare_genlsubj.cf.sig,
> 70_sare_header.cf.sig), and Matt's Key 0x1129F0D3 used for signi
I would assume someone has already solved this, but it seems hard to search for.
I would like to setup SA site wide, so that all the users can use it. However,
users are not very technical, so it would be nice if they could have an easy
method to train their own DBs.
I envisioned that a "[EM
On Monday 03 October 2005 06:03 pm, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> > With 3.1 since these are all now plug-ins should they still be listed
> > in the local cf?
> >
> > use_razor2 1
> > razor_timeout 10
> > use_dcc 1
> > dcc_timeout 10
>
Hi,
I noticed that spamd has been tending to log more and more things with
each new release. I'm not complaining, it's very useful when I run into
problems.
However, it would be nice to be able to tone it down a little bit when
things are running smoothly. Looking at the spamd manpage, I d
Chris wrote:
With 3.1 since these are all now plug-ins should they still be listed in the
local cf?
use_razor2 1
razor_timeout 10
use_dcc 1
dcc_timeout 10
dcc_body_max99
dcc_fuz1_max99
dcc_fuz2_max 99
use_pyzor
Chris wrote:
Thanks Daryl for this and the info on the tags placement. I hate being a
PITA but I've another question regarding Razor checks:
1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.5 RAZ
With 3.1 since these are all now plug-ins should they still be listed in the
local cf?
use_razor2 1
razor_timeout 10
use_dcc 1
dcc_timeout 10
dcc_body_max99
dcc_fuz1_max99
dcc_fuz2_max99
use_pyzor
Dermot Paikkos wrote:
Hi,
SpamAssassin version 3.1.0 running on Perl version 5.8.0
With Exim 4.43
I upgraded my SA to 3.1 recently and am having trouble with the
bayes_path. My local.cf had the full path to my bayes as
/usr/exim/.spamassassin. I had received a couple of warnings about
this w
John Hodson wrote:
After having used Spamassassin with mime-defang for some considerable
time, with no problems, we are suddenly experiencing serious performance
problems.
Last thursday, after effectively being mail bombed, which caused max
mimedefang children to be spawned, and mail coming in
After having used Spamassassin with mime-defang for some considerable
time, with no problems, we are suddenly experiencing serious performance
problems.
Last thursday, after effectively being mail bombed, which caused max
mimedefang children to be spawned, and mail coming in at such a rate that
th
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>>Sep 30 07:28:54 linux spamd[15172]: Can't locate LMAP/CID2SPF.pm in @INC
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SPF/Query.pm line 1749,
> Mail::SPF::Query wants to use LMAP::CID2SPF, but you don't have it installed.
Yeah, I figured that ... it's now installed.
I'm still g
> I'd think sprint would take care of the missing SUBJECT header and Messege
> ID! Isn't that an RFC requirement? Or just common email curtesy?
By RFC2822 section 3.6, the only required header fields are the date
and originator address. The Subject field is optional. The Message-ID
SHOULD be pre
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 03:07:25PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
> I'd think sprint would take care of the missing SUBJECT header and Messege
> ID! Isn't that an RFC requirement? Or just common email curtesy?
According to 2822, Subject is optional, the Message-ID header is also
optional but is list
I suspect that Sprint is doing this to save on text messaging characters
from Cell Phones.
I beleive the message ID is RFC, the subject is just curtesy..
> SprintPCS Phone email causes this:
>
> They are sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED], where N is a number
> for phone.
>
> Content analysis details:
SprintPCS Phone email causes this:
They are sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED], where N is a number
for phone.
Content analysis details: (5.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
0.2 NO_REAL_NAME
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] stated:
> Which begs the question I don't remember anybody asking: "What the
> is "DomainKeys" and why should it experience a special
> exception to sane ordering if header information with time of
> application ordered message tags?
It's a scheme whereby the
will there be a test mentioned in the report as to whether bayes was
used in the test of the email? I've used sa-learn on several hundred
missed and caught spams but i still don't see any mention of bayes use
in the report header (I am seeing autolearn=(ham|spam|no) from time to
time as expected)
Fran Fabrizio wrote:
> We've been running SpamAssassin on a Fedora server successfully for
> about a year now. About a month ago, we all noticed a spike in the
> number of spam getting through. I upgraded to 3.1.0 but that does not
> seem to help. I'm beginning to suspect that some local databa
"mouss" wrote:
> run the message through spamassassin -t (under the same uid as amavisd)
> and look at which rules were hit.
> also, put the message on a web page and post the url, so that we check
> it on our configs. you may be missing some "custom" rules.
..sorry but pheraps I don't understan
We've been running SpamAssassin on a Fedora server successfully for
about a year now. About a month ago, we all noticed a spike in the
number of spam getting through. I upgraded to 3.1.0 but that does not
seem to help. I'm beginning to suspect that some local database or the
learning has s
Hi,
I use qmail+qmail-scanner+fast_spamassassin, this is an example of my x-spam
headers:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=28.3 required=5.0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Report: SA TESTS
2.2 SARE_SUB_MEDS_LEO obfuscated subject header
3.2 FUZZY_PRICES BODY: Attemp
Hi,
SpamAssassin version 3.1.0 running on Perl version 5.8.0
With Exim 4.43
I upgraded my SA to 3.1 recently and am having trouble with the
bayes_path. My local.cf had the full path to my bayes as
/usr/exim/.spamassassin. I had received a couple of warnings about
this when I ran lint so change
25 matches
Mail list logo
