wolfgang wrote:
Hi,
http connections to www.rulesemporium.com are timing out here. Maybe someone
in charge is reading this and can fix it ...
regards,
wolfgang
There seems to be an issue with the filesystem on that box. Email sent
to the appropriate people, but it looks like a manual
At 12:58 PM Friday, 7/22/2005, wolfgang wrote -=>
Hi,
http connections to www.rulesemporium.com are timing out here. Maybe someone
in charge is reading this and can fix it ...
This seems to happen once in a a while...
I wonder if it's ISP related?
Ed Kasky
~
Randomly Generated Quote (
Hi,
http connections to www.rulesemporium.com are timing out here. Maybe someone
in charge is reading this and can fix it ...
regards,
wolfgang
I used an update script from SARE (www.rulesemporium.com) and
subscribed to the following lists:
TRIPWIRE, EVILNUMBERS, SARE_RANDOM, SARE_FRAUD, SARE_ADULT, ANTIDRUG
Now the update seems to work just fine. And I find the rules in /etc/
spamassassin. But how can be sure they are working? I mea
Matt Kettler schrieb:
> Amavis ONLY adds the x-spam-* headers when the score is above the "tag level"
_AND_ when it's addressed to a domain amavisd-new considers local.
Most probably you'll have to tweak you local_domains setting in
amavisd-new.
-thh
Chris Barnes wrote:
This is really the key - from a SA standpoint, the best you can do is
mark the message as spam and let the MUA (Outlook) deal with putting
things into the proper folders on the user's machine (in the .pst file).
I don't know OL well enough, but I suspect that there is likel
:-) Funny!
I have been reading, quite quick :) and have found the error. Was a
error of mine. I didn't populate a variable with my domains, because
such variable indicates amavis to put or not put the X headers.
The variable is @local_domains_acl = qw( .example.com .example2.com );
Once popu
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Amavis does it's own message tagging, and does not keep SA's markups. It
> consults spamassassin merely as a scanner.
>
> I'm not an amavis expert, so I can't tell you how, but I can tell you that
> it's
> amavis you need to reconfigure if you want these added, as only amavi
Jonathan Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i would like to know if there's some special feature that needs to be
> enabled/disabled in order to work 100% compliant with amavis.
>
> I'm my actual installation (Exim 4.50 + amavisd-new-20030616-p10 +
> ClamAV 0.86 + SpamAssassin 3.0 on a Debian Sarge platfo
Hi,
i would like to know if there's some special feature that needs to be
enabled/disabled in order to work 100% compliant with amavis.
I'm my actual installation (Exim 4.50 + amavisd-new-20030616-p10 +
ClamAV 0.86 + SpamAssassin 3.0 on a Debian Sarge platform) the MTA
passes the email to am
Mark Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Q) Given that this RH machine runs only POP3 (management will not
> allow anything else)
This is really the key - from a SA standpoint, the best you can do is
mark the message as spam and let the MUA (Outlook) deal with putting
things into the proper f
On Friday, July 22, 2005 at 12:32:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
> A lot of my spam lately has had an ISO encoded subject line, like:
> =?iso-8859-1?B?T2ZmaWNlIHNvZnR3YXJlIC0gNzUlIE9GRg==?=
> Since none of my friends ever use ISO encoded subject lines, I
> wanted to create a rule to flag
A lot of my spam lately has had an ISO encoded subject line, like:
=?iso-8859-1?B?T2ZmaWNlIHNvZnR3YXJlIC0gNzUlIE9GRg==?=
Since none of my friends ever use ISO encoded subject lines, I wanted to create
a rule to flags those messages. However, everything I've found indicates that
Spamassassin tes
>...
>On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Loren Wilton wrote:
>
>> Sounds like an surbl problem if spamsite.com isn't listed.
>
>That's just an example I made up... :)
>...
Bad choice of example: spamsite. com is an actual "spamsite".
The domain "example.com" is reserved for exactly this type of usage
a
The best thing to do is probably throw the current database away and start
over. As you seem to have several users, you should have bayes working
again within a very few hours, or less.
You should delete the current database, reset the scores to normal (and
increase the bayes_99 score to somethin
Hi
We are using Spamassassin + Postfix + Mailscanner on our SMTP servers.
Of late I have noticed that a lot of ham mails are getting a high BAYES
score.
I have overriden bayes with lower scores in order to avoid false
postives ( and possibly mail loss )
How do I de-poison the bayes database, a
Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2005 08:15 schrieb jdow:
> There generally is no specific procmail log file. It is generally in one
> of the mail log files in /var/log/.
Yes. But you can create user user specific lof file with
LOGFILE=$HOME/.procmail.log
Thomas
--
icq:133073900
http://www.t-arend.de
pg
> OK, so that's supposed to happen. Is there any way to have the entire
> host checked? I've seen a good volume of junk where the domain is clean,
> but if I do a manual lookup on the entire hostname in the spam it is
> indeed listed.
I *suspect* what is happening here is that the domain isn't i
18 matches
Mail list logo
